Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Miscellaneous [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Miscellaneous [BG] Music-related discussion, not specific to the bass or any other forum


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oceanside; So. Cali
Live sound bass subs question

Sign in to disble this ad
Got a question about live sound. I'm looking to get some bass subs for our PA. Leaning toward passive as opposed to powered.
I'd like to hear your thoughts and recommendations.
Using them for club gig's. Most of the clubs are 300 - 400 capacity, however I'd rather have more than I need than not enough.
I'd also like to avoid super heavy gear ala dual 18 type stuff.
Thanks for the input in advance.
  #2  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oceanside; So. Cali
Bump - Anyone, Anyone?
  #3  
Old 04-29-2006, 01:21 PM
Munjibunga's Avatar
Total Hyper-Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Groom Lake, NV
GOLD Supporting Member
I've used the powered Mackie SWA-1501's, and they were OK, but can't compare to my EAW SB-220's. The Mackies have 500 watts each into a single 15. With the EAW's, each one gets its own bridged PLX 2402. The EAW cabs have two twelves, and weigh about 100 pounds each. They have incredible punch and are very tight sounding.

I'm in the middle between powered an unpowered speakers. If the powered ones have enough power, they're easier to haul and hook up. But there's nothing like a couple thousand watts of sub per side. Mackie seems to be capitalizing on EAW's technology, but I don't know if they plan to upgrade their powered subs, which are getting to be a little long in the tooth.
__________________
What is this thing called butthurt?
  #4  
Old 04-29-2006, 10:47 PM
Registered User

Canadian Distributor, Basson Sound Equipment
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Having used both kinds as an engineer over the last 16 years..... go passive with a really good power amp. I've never found the built-in amps to truly punch as hard as a great PA amp.
Plus, with a passive system, you can alter the crossover point, change the slope, and tune with the crossover first, and IMPO, end up with a more finely adjusted system in the end.
__________________
Form your own opinions, and own the opinions you form.
  #5  
Old 04-30-2006, 07:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder Lizard
Plus, with a passive system, you can alter the crossover point, change the slope, and tune with the crossover first, and IMPO, end up with a more finely adjusted system in the end.
All that adjustability can actually work against you if you're not experienced. To me that's where the powered PA market is best suited. Personally I'd also go passive, but I've tuned a PA two hundred in my time.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.