|  | 
11-02-2008, 07:32 PM
|  | Registered User | | | | | Martin Acoustic - Sub line of guitars.
Sign in to disble this ad
What is Martin Acoustic's sub line of acoustics? (e.g Fender/Squier) | 
11-03-2008, 03:29 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Hampton, Va USA | | | I believe The DX line is the cheapest they offer in a full size guitar. Then you move up to the bottom of the next tier with the D15.
__________________
LOG #93 Republican vs. Democrat = Divide and Conquer
| 
11-03-2008, 05:12 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: NET | | They used to make the Sigma line up until last year. Those are very good guitars indeed for being so affordable, and sometimes turn up on eBay. Here's the Wiki entry: Quote: |
In 1970, guitar maker Martin created a line of inexpensive guitars made in part from laminated wood, instead of the solid wood used in their main line. (The name may have originated by turning the Greek letter Sigma (Σ) on its side.) Construction moved from Japan (1970 - 83), to Korea (1984 - 93/94), to Taiwan (1993 - 2007). The first Sigma's were dreadnought acoustics, DR-1 through DR-7 (D for dreadnought and R for rosewood). Sigma built the GCS (Grand Concert Series) to Martin's 000 body specifications. There were models in the CS (Classical Series). Other instruments included mandolins, banjos, acoustic and electric basses and solid body and hollow body electric guitars. Some solid body electric guitars were made by Tokai Guitars Company, LTD. After finishing, "Each Sigma instrument was brought into the Martin factory to be inspected and adjusted by Martin personnel before going to the authorized retail store for retail sale.
|
__________________
Last edited by cdef : 11-03-2008 at 11:26 AM.
| 
11-03-2008, 06:36 AM
|  | Supporting Curmudgeon Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Suburban Chicago, IL | | | I have a late 90's Sigma D12ST (I think it is) - a solid top dread twelve. Not bad at all!
__________________
Ken If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning. As I cuddled the porcupine he said I had none to blame, but me. | 
11-03-2008, 11:08 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Madison, NJ | | | Funny you should mention this. I just went on a tour of their factory the other day, and someone asked this question. The DX line is the lowest, which are now made in Mexico out of High Pressure Laminate and are shipped to Nazareth, PA for final QA. They're good guitars, but very much the Squier to Fender. They're simply made cheaper, out of cheaper materials that require less labor. The HPL can be bent without any need for heat or pressure.
That being said, I'm still very impressed with Martin, even their work in Mexico. Each time a new product is to begin production in Mexico, several Nazareth employees travel down to set up the machinery and train the staff. They're apparently very well trained, and the quality shows.
__________________
- Timothy P. Lyons
Your Neighborhood Friendly Candyman
| 
11-03-2008, 11:51 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tplyons Funny you should mention this. I just went on a tour of their factory the other day, and someone asked this question. The DX line is the lowest, which are now made in Mexico out of High Pressure Laminate and are shipped to Nazareth, PA for final QA. They're good guitars, but very much the Squier to Fender. They're simply made cheaper, out of cheaper materials that require less labor. The HPL can be bent without any need for heat or pressure.
That being said, I'm still very impressed with Martin, even their work in Mexico. Each time a new product is to begin production in Mexico, several Nazareth employees travel down to set up the machinery and train the staff. They're apparently very well trained, and the quality shows. | CX, DX, I guess the model numbers changed. The main feature was the laminate neck, sandwiched together out of about 20 layers. Durable, rock-solid, and VERY heavy. You can, if you look REALLY hard, find a CX that was made in Nazareth, PA, which is the better option IMO. Those guitars will still use real wood for the back/sides; the top, I'm pretty sure, has been and continues to be solid spruce. Most of that type are now MIMs as was said, and the back/sides are made of a material not far removed from Formica in its look and feel; that pretty much turned me off from budget Martins; Taylor's entry-level 100s-200s, while a bit more expensive, still use real wood everywhere and their older 200s are solid wood (all 100/200 levels are now laminate; sapele on the 100, rosewood on the 200). | 
11-03-2008, 01:39 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Madison, NJ | | | Also, for the record, I play an Ibanez as my primary guitar. It's a copy of the Martin dreadnought, but for the price, there's a lot better out there than Martin.
The Martin DX series are good guitars, but there are better deals made out of real wood.
__________________
- Timothy P. Lyons
Your Neighborhood Friendly Candyman
| 
11-03-2008, 02:04 PM
|  | Registered User | | | | | Sigma....there you go! Thanks. | 
11-04-2008, 10:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Listowel/KW Ontario | | | Better guitars out there for the money. Yamaha makes some amazing acoustics, Simon & Patrick are great, Segual are very solid, Ovation makes a really good entry level acoustic. Martin and Taylor have had their day and are just running on reputation now.
lowsound
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by username n/a How is a picture of me feeling up a stranger music related? | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |