Quote:
Originally Posted by fingers So the cover of this month's Downbeat features the Branford Marsalis Quartet. There is one part in there where the article that I found especially thought provoking. Read and discuss. Branford: In 1941 Duke Ellington's band was playing with two mics placed about 18 feet in front of the band, 18 feet high and 16 feet away, and you can hear the bass crystal clear with no amp or mic. That's the sound I want. The bass player had to think about the team.
Eric Revis: I've had this argument with several bass players. They say "why can't we play lines? I want to play like Charlie Parker.
Branford: Then get a guitar
Revis: The misconception exists that the bass has to be liberated. Liberated from what? Did Wilbur Ware need to be liberated from anything? Does Charlie Haden?
This is just an excerpt. Eric goes on to talk about developing his own voice and the process therein. Interesting read. |
- I think both are possible. I can play the full range of sounds the bass can make in most situations I play in with no mic or amp.
I decided to use an amp for my last three double bass gigs, it does help with making the time more crisp and easy.
If an ensemble can play together in real time a two mics out front recording is no problem.
In other periods I read Duke recorded the band through the bass mic.
I saw Matt Brewer unamplfied in a big hall with the Lee Konitz trio and he had no trouble taking his share of the solos, and played with a really interactive concept.
If you look at small groups as boiled down orchestras it is not just the low end the bass needs to take care of but the string section.
It is rare that an orchestral piece has low end pumping the whole time.
Working with extra colors give the lows more power when you bring them in.
So, I sort of agree, and at least don't totally disagree.