| That story seems to go to extraordinary lengths to paint Mr. Clayton as a lazy, can't be bothered, rich guy. Each an every paragraph 'skews' the story in a rather 'anti-rich-people' light...
If the personal assistant was stealing, whether or not he was watching his bank statements is irrelevant. If she admitted to stealing - she is certainly not above suspicion for what he's claiming and should be both investigated and prosecuted if found guilty.
Otherwise, all that fluff about "he didn't have the time" or "he's richer than God, so who cares what happens to his money?" spin that seems so thick in this 'report' feels very out of place and unnecessary to the story.
__________________
On Groove Duty
|