|  | | 
04-14-2011, 03:26 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Los Angeles, CA | | | The Hobbit - P Jackson vid blog
Sign in to disble this ad
|
04-14-2011, 03:34 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Fairfax, Virginia | | | Cant wait, it looks awesome!
__________________
The Official Fender Precision Bass Club #406
Virginia Bassist #153
|
04-14-2011, 04:32 PM
|  | www.HeavyMetalOpera.com
Unofficialy endorsing EBMM, Avatar Speakers | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Seattle (ish), WA | | | YES! Only three years! |
04-14-2011, 04:52 PM
|  | That's the way uh huh uh huh I like it.. | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Robbinsville, NJ | | | CANT FRIGGEN WAIT!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by 6jase5  Cleavage heals. | Quote:
Originally Posted by machine gewehr I happened to have a better experience, a peegasm. | |
04-14-2011, 05:09 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado | | | Can't tell you how happy I am that Jackson ended up on this film. He did the trilogy beautifully!
__________________
"...awesome as a monkey wearing a tuxedo made of bacon, riding on a unicorn!'"
|
04-14-2011, 05:47 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Listowel/KW Ontario | | | I am PUMPED for this! I am so happy that Jackson is directing and that they are doing it in two films, there is way too much story for one film.
lowsound
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by username n/a How is a picture of me feeling up a stranger music related? | |
04-14-2011, 06:29 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Metro Detroit | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Salamon YES! Only three years! | Wrong, the first film is due Christmas 2012. That's about 1 1/2 years. |
04-14-2011, 06:47 PM
|  | No need to ask, he's a smooth... Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: West Midlands UK | | Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck norriss | Thanks for the link - excellent! Can't wait for this. I'm not pinning my hopes on 2012 too much, though, that seems a very short timescale. FOTR was due in 2000 originally and ended up being put back to 2001. |
04-14-2011, 08:48 PM
| | That's the way uh huh uh huh I like it.. | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Robbinsville, NJ | | Quote:
Originally Posted by iamlowsound I am PUMPED for this! I am so happy that Jackson is directing and that they are doing it in two films, there is way too much story for one film.
lowsound | Absolutely! This made my day 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by 6jase5 Cleavage heals. | Quote:
Originally Posted by machine gewehr I happened to have a better experience, a peegasm. | |
04-14-2011, 09:17 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Maine/Vermont | | | I'll guess I'll be the only one with a gun in my mouth.
So goes. |
04-20-2011, 03:02 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Wellington, New Zealand | | | I'm really happy that he ended up on this film too. After all that drama with the Actors Guild blah blah blah. I was there at the protests here in Wellington. This deserves to be kept local.
__________________
Blues Is The Roots, All Else Is The Fruits - Blues Bass Players Club #139
Fretless Fender Jazz - Fretless '76 Ibanez Precision
|
04-20-2011, 04:23 AM
|  | Working on successful. Got the first syllable... | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Huddinge, Sweden | | | I have sad news for all of you who can't wait:
You're gonna have to wait anyway.
__________________ Don't make me snarky. You wouldn't like me when I'm snarky. Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipaste Only thing I know for sure is that all credibility issues can be solved by showing up with a stuffed beaver duct taped to your head. | |
04-20-2011, 05:01 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New-brunswick | | Nice |
04-20-2011, 11:15 AM
|  | Online | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Sunapee, New Hampshire | | In 3D? That may or may not be cool. But it is cool to keep the blog going for fans to look in on production. That is usually sold as a DVD later on. 
-Mike
Last edited by MJ5150 : 04-20-2011 at 11:17 AM.
|
04-20-2011, 11:29 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Charleston, WV | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Deluge Of Sound I'll guess I'll be the only one with a gun in my mouth.
So goes. | Now if we can find a way to keep your hands from typing the overly dramatic statements.... hmmm...
__________________
Schroeder Club #99
|
04-20-2011, 11:40 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Denton, Texas | | | he mentions something about 3d in his vid blog, but i'm hoping that was a joke. |
04-20-2011, 11:48 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Charleston, WV | | | This 48 frames/sec thing worries me too...but I'm gonna just hold tight and have faith in the PJ and his team...err army.
I just fail to see why a fantasy film has the need to look more real beyond what they accomplished in the previous installments. It may be utterly amazing or it may just end up weird. Guess we'll see eventually.
__________________
Schroeder Club #99
|
04-20-2011, 12:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Denton, Texas | | | there was link to a similar page about the Tintin movie...which i was excited about, but i thought it was supposed to be live action. I mean, i appreciate the technological advancements with CGI, but it doesn't necessarily make a better movie. Especially when adapting something already animated, it removes any real point to the project imo. ugh... |
04-20-2011, 11:34 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Woodland Hills, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by SnoMan This 48 frames/sec thing worries me too...but I'm gonna just hold tight and have faith in the PJ and his team...err army.
I just fail to see why a fantasy film has the need to look more real beyond what they accomplished in the previous installments. It may be utterly amazing or it may just end up weird. Guess we'll see eventually. | 48 fps is a step in the right direction. We need to be at 120 fps, that's when film will really start to look real.
IMO, the reason it needs to look real is that the whole look is hyper-realistic, that is what pulls you in, it's not a fairy tale. Anyway, Jackson wants to advance the state of the art, and this is a logical step.
I agree that 3D may or may not add much, it usually doesn't detract, but the glasses can be annoying. |
04-20-2011, 11:59 PM
| | www.HeavyMetalOpera.com
Unofficialy endorsing EBMM, Avatar Speakers | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Seattle (ish), WA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by smeet 48 fps is a step in the right direction. We need to be at 120 fps, that's when film will really start to look real.
IMO, the reason it needs to look real is that the whole look is hyper-realistic, that is what pulls you in, it's not a fairy tale. Anyway, Jackson wants to advance the state of the art, and this is a logical step.
I agree that 3D may or may not add much, it usually doesn't detract, but the glasses can be annoying. | I disagree with the 120fps thing - a LOT. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |
