Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Off Topic [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Off Topic [BG] Non-music-related discussion and chat


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-30-2011, 10:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reynoldsburg Ohio
Mars S. Pole photos

Sign in to disble this ad
You know, its bothered me for several years that after the original Mars Orbiter took a ton of pictures of Mars, we were sending better, more maneuverable vehicles to Mars (the Rovers), but always to the north. NEVER to the south pole area where the Mars Orbiter Camera also took a lot of pictures that show some incredible things that bear definite investigation. Why not???? What in the world would a Rover had found if it rolled right up to what you see on this website (there are others, including official NASA site).

A forest on Mars

"It's the case of a photo taken by MOC (Mars Orbiter Camera), a satellite for photographical mapping of Mars that, at latitude -82.02°, longitude 284.38° (near to the Martian south pole) has filmed something totally incredible, but still neglected: it's some form of vegetation on Mars.
The photo number is M08-04688."

The structures seen in the Mars photos are referred to as trees only because of comparative morphology. Gotta refer to them as something and "trees" is as good as any other name for now.

Fascinating---wish we'd take a good close look with a Rover. Might be more fascinating than we can imagine.
__________________
Napalm---the best answer for so many problems.
  #2  
Old 06-30-2011, 11:02 PM
Munjibunga's Avatar
Total Hyper-Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Groom Lake, NV
GOLD Supporting Member
Dendritic patterns are among the most common in nature. I'd be interested in a knowledgeable person's assessment of the patterns, rather than that of Mirko Elviro. There is no evidence of vegetation on Mars.
__________________
What is this thing called butthurt?
  #3  
Old 07-01-2011, 02:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Finland (Northern Europe)
Hi.

LOL.

What Munji said.

If You watch pretty much anything inpure solidify naturally, that's the result You'll get.

One can cheat, obviously, otherwise most of the modern marwels wouldn't be possible. Any and all of those "cheats" can also happen naturally.

Perhaps the people, who have analyzed the pics and didn't see what ever mundanes sees in them to be important enough to warrant an expedition, have had enough lab experience to see 'em for what those shapes are.

When us couch potatoes try to do science, it may well be fun and tabloid material, but it rarely delivers.

Regards
Sam
  #4  
Old 07-01-2011, 04:59 AM
Relic's Avatar
That's the way uh huh uh huh I like it..
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Supporting Member
Neat but yeah, no forests over there full of bright orange winged space monkeys
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6jase5 View Post
Cleavage heals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by machine gewehr View Post
I happened to have a better experience, a peegasm.
  #5  
Old 07-01-2011, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reynoldsburg Ohio
"Forest" is only a comparative term used. Regardless of the guy putting them up, the sizes involved and varying shapes and distribution make them unique on Mars as far as we know and I don't think they should be dismissed as just a 2D "shape". North is giving us nothing each time---but South there is Something. We oughta check out this Something. Its too unusual not to if we are, in fact, trying to find something.
__________________
Napalm---the best answer for so many problems.
  #6  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:06 AM
Relic's Avatar
That's the way uh huh uh huh I like it..
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Supporting Member
Well, I'm not saying that we shouldn't take a closer look, I absolutely agree with you 100% there. That would be awesome.
BTW- I didn't mean to come across in a mocking tone or anything, I've just seen some folks (not necessarily here) make some really outlandish claims over the past few years and it sometimes drives me nuts
here, check out this thread that I had started a couple weeks ago. I'm still wondering what this was all about (ie hoax or natural object??):
Object on Mars..? Is this for real, or a load of bull?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6jase5 View Post
Cleavage heals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by machine gewehr View Post
I happened to have a better experience, a peegasm.
  #7  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:08 AM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Steve Clayton Accessories
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central Texas
I think they did send a Rover to the South, but at last report it's up on blocks in someone's front yard.
  #8  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Twixt a rock and a hard place
Supporting Member
Maybe they don't want to invade John Carter's privacy. (You know the classic book series?) Or maybe the movie, "Angry Red Planet" had it right and the vegetation there is carnivorous.
  #9  
Old 07-01-2011, 12:59 PM
john turner's Avatar
You don't want to do that. Trust me.
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: atlanta ga
check this pic out :

Where In The Universe #86

apparently the evaporating co2 ice causes these patterns that look like tumbleweeds. very cool.

i love how folks automatically assume that nasa is keeping information about having found life on mars hidden. because, as we all know, it wouldb e nasa's best interest to keep such information hidden - discovering actual life on mars would do -nothing- to help their budget requests - the public would not even begin to care./sarcasm
__________________
Talkbass Forum Administrator Ask me, I'm here to help.

Lord Only on Myspace - 4 New Lord Only Tracks from our 2nd CD
Lord Only - yes. we're back. sorta
versatile residue -12 minute instrumental

I find it elevating and exhilarating to discover that we live in a universe which permits the evolution of molecular machines as intricate and subtle as we. - Carl Sagan
Rock 'n' Roll... It's got nothing to do with journalists, and it hasn't really even got anything to do with musicians, either. - Pete Townsend
  #10  
Old 07-01-2011, 01:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reynoldsburg Ohio
Yeah, nice photo on Where in the Universe #86. I notice they claim the lines resembling reeds are just lines that are are streaks. Of course, streaks do not continue up and project off the thing they are on, and you can see the lower ground beyond, between their tops. Look like natural structures of some sort--not streaks on the ground as they obviously project above it. Don't know what they could be, but would be interesting to know since NASA claims they are looking for things other than dirt and rocks.
__________________
Napalm---the best answer for so many problems.
  #11  
Old 07-01-2011, 08:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Harrisburg PA
looked like some form of "crystalization" rather than "trees" to me
  #12  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: WNC, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEKer View Post
Of course, streaks do not continue up and project off the thing they are on, and you can see the lower ground beyond, between their tops.
Of course, planetary orbiters tend to look down when taking pictures. They're not looking out the window of a Cessna here. The tops you think you're seeing are the bottoms.

Here's an object lesson on seeing what's there, not what you want to be there:

APOD: 2007 July 17 - The Same Color Illusion
__________________
You be the ninth.
  #13  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: tulsa oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaynieAD View Post
looked like some form of "crystalization" rather than "trees" to me
have they ruled out a contamination on the lens?
it honestly looks like bacteria colonies at high magnification.



just sayin.
__________________
[witty signature here]
  #14  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reynoldsburg Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by boing View Post
Of course, planetary orbiters tend to look down when taking pictures. They're not looking out the window of a Cessna here. The tops you think you're seeing are the bottoms.

Here's an object lesson on seeing what's there, not what you want to be there:

APOD: 2007 July 17 - The Same Color Illusion
illusions are great but you can see the topo relief from the angle of the photo. Still don't buy the streak theory.
Either way, that stuff and the "tree shaped" stuff should be looked at as its worth looking at more than the usual nothing that the Rovers have checked out. What it is---anyone's guess. Wish we'd find out.
__________________
Napalm---the best answer for so many problems.
  #15  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:21 PM
GregC's Avatar
Johnny and Joe
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird View Post
When us couch potatoes try to do science, it may well be fun and tabloid material, but it rarely delivers.
Great sig material there, I'm using it. It's a fascinating subject, and I think it'd be cool as hell if we found something substantial on Mars. It just hasn't happened yet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim C View Post
All these micro guys keep throwing a single 12AX7 behind the input jack with the marketing team shouting "has a tube; sounds like tubes".
LOG #143
  #16  
Old 07-02-2011, 08:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Harrisburg PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEKer View Post
Still don't buy the streak theory.
i'm with you there
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.