|  | | 
03-05-2011, 06:08 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana | | | New book sheds new light on Lincoln's racial views
Sign in to disble this ad
| 
03-05-2011, 06:09 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana | | | "For the sake of your race, you should sacrifice something of your present comfort for the purpose of being as grand in that respect as the white people," Lincoln said, promoting his idea of colonization: resettling blacks in foreign countries on the belief that whites and blacks could not coexist in the same nation.
Lincoln went on to say that free blacks who envisioned a permanent life in the United States were being "selfish" and he promoted Central America as an ideal location "especially because of the similarity of climate with your native land — thus being suited to your physical condition." | 
03-05-2011, 06:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Québec | | | 3,2,1....cue Dr Cheese......
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by machine gewehr One of my balls just dropped off.I am mono-balled from now on... | | 
03-06-2011, 01:52 AM
| | | | Well, this is not NEW information, although this is a very interesting topic I must admit. | 
03-06-2011, 04:21 AM
|  | Gettin' medieval on yo' bass... | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: new hampshire | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RestInPieces Well, this is not NEW information, although this is a very interesting topic I must admit. | +1. That Lincoln favored returning blacks to Africa is nothing new. The book may add some detail or nuance to our understanding of his views, but I'm not seeing anything so revolutionary.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by audiomitch Trust me, I'm an anonymous source on the internet. | Washburn Club #12, Yamaha Club #286/BB Club #5, NH bassists club #1.
| 
03-06-2011, 05:03 AM
| | | | | 
03-06-2011, 07:39 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Harrisburg PA | | | in an era where people would rather have them enslaved or killed, i think lincolns views seem pretty forward thinking. gotta put it in context | 
03-06-2011, 09:49 AM
|  | User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: East Coast | | | Sometimes result is more important than intent or motivation.
__________________
Jim B - If you don't know which note to play, play them all.
LOG Roller, Fender Fan, a MusicMan, Rickenbacker-backer, Gib-son, Hay-man. http://www.jimmyleejames.com/ | 
03-06-2011, 10:38 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | While hardly new news, it is a fascinating tidbit to chew on. If for no other reason, it shows exactly how much relevant and pertinent information can get swept under the rug and nearly forgotten. That entire period of American history 1850-1900 or so may be the most rewritten, edited, sanitized and just plain BS'ed story on the planet.
It's my understanding that the concept of "colonization" was getting some traction at the time and he might have very well been able to pull it off had it not been for Booth.
In any event it goes to show how a couple of degrees deflection can change the world over time. Had Lincoln lived the would and his place in history would have been a far, far different. Maybe better, maybe worse but certainly different.
IMHO
Last edited by Steve : 03-06-2011 at 10:41 AM.
| 
03-06-2011, 12:04 PM
|  | is, against all odds, still a scuba viking. | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Alta Loma, California | | | Abraham Lincoln helped deliver Blacks from slavery. Who gives a rat's ass what he thought about them. It's our choices that define who we are, not our convictions.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Cheese It is never the duty of the oppressed to make a bigot feel comfortable. | | 
03-06-2011, 12:59 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Philadelphia, PA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ugly_bassplayer 3,2,1....cue Dr Cheese...... | exactly my thought as soon as i saw the thread title 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ6292358 16 years playing bass and i have never lubed my nuts. I never knew you could/should.. | | 
03-06-2011, 01:08 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Maine/Vermont | | Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaynieAD in an era where people would rather have them enslaved or killed, i think lincolns views seem pretty forward thinking. gotta put it in context | No, John Brown was forward thinking. Lincoln was a moderate who would've never issued the Emancipation Proclamation if it wasn't politically beneficial. | 
03-06-2011, 01:14 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: tulsa oklahoma | | what a minute! overt racism in the 19'th century?!?!
I am appalled. i don't want to be apart of any country that has a past that includes racism. . . 
__________________
[witty signature here]
| 
03-06-2011, 02:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Reynoldsburg Ohio | | Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaynieAD in an era where people would rather have them enslaved or killed, i think lincolns views seem pretty forward thinking. gotta put it in context |
Absolutely--put it in context.
BTW, Lincoln also met more than once with Frederick Douglas over the question. And the colonization idea really did not dominate Lincoln's thoughts that long.
Back in the 1960's Bruce Catton wrote a 3 volume set of the Civil War that is superb--not focused on the bloody battles (altho included) so exclusively, but rather the politics and how the racial question grew to dominate the war. Well researched and referenced to the nth degree, it is a terrific read and gives a clearer view of the politics of the nation than any other civil war history I have ever read and I probably have at least 50 different books on it.
A must-read for anyone truly interested in that aspect (political) of the war.
__________________
Napalm---the best answer for so many problems.
| 
03-06-2011, 02:40 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: The Motor City | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ugly_bassplayer 3,2,1....cue Dr Cheese...... | For today's matinee, the part of Dr. Cheese will be played by Malthumb......<j/k>
As others have said, you have to put it in context with the times. If Lincoln were in power in the 1950's he would probably have been a mainstay of the "separate but equal" crowd. I don't get the impression that he liked black people or disliked black people. They were just a political liability in his attempts to keep the union together. He apparently had the impression that blacks and whites would have difficulty in coexisting in 19th century America, and since white folk weren't goin' nowhere.....
I'm not gnna run out and burn all my $5 bills over this one.
__________________ Politics PA-luh tiks; from the Greek word Poly , meaning many and the English word Tick , a small bloodsucking pest. (saw this on a board in an office in Lansing, MI) | 
03-06-2011, 03:27 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Rochelle, Illinois | | | To put this in further context, just about everyone believed in racist ideas before our modern understanding of genetics and ethnicity around the mid 1900's. Most Europeans and those of similar descent believed that people of African ancestry were inherently inferior. The belief was widespread even among those who abhorred slavery.
__________________ Purple is a fruit.- H. Simpson
| 
03-06-2011, 06:07 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Harrisburg PA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Deluge Of Sound No, John Brown was forward thinking. Lincoln was a moderate who would've never issued the Emancipation Proclamation if it wasn't politically beneficial. | or you could read the important part of what I typed. | 
03-06-2011, 06:19 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Northern Va. | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Deluge Of Sound Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaynieAD in an era where people would rather have them enslaved or killed, i think lincolns views seem pretty forward thinking. gotta put it in context | No, John Brown was forward thinking. Lincoln was a moderate who would've never issued the Emancipation Proclamation if it wasn't politically beneficial. | +1DoS
However I think it was more practical than political.. His main goal was to save the Union... Not to end slavery.. Quote:
Originally Posted by hbarcat To put this in further context, just about everyone believed in racist ideas before our modern understanding of genetics and ethnicity around the mid 1900's. Most Europeans and those of similar descent believed that people of African ancestry were inherently inferior. The belief was widespread even among those who abhorred slavery. | This is true... and these notions persists today in many places.. You can't legislate morality.. all you can do is try to live it in the things you do and are willing to work for | 
03-06-2011, 06:27 PM
| | Registered User Wouldn't you like to know?! | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Atlanta | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ugly_bassplayer 3,2,1....cue Dr Cheese...... | Quote:
Originally Posted by irishpride28 exactly my thought as soon as i saw the thread title  | Fail!
__________________
There's a reason why women love us bass players.The tone is like Barry White's voice, and the strings are thick like Ron Jeremy's...well, you get the point.
| 
03-06-2011, 07:34 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Maine/Vermont | | Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaynieAD or you could read the important part of what I typed. | Clearly we disagree on what the important part is. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |