Thread bump for update and conclusion.
I did what I should have done in the first place and got professional legal advice (thanks, Baronyx and others). He told me to get all my records, letters and receipts together and figure out exactly what I owe versus how much they say I owe and we'd go from there. It turns out I did legally owe the original creditors some money but just not as much as they claimed (which was why I disputed it in the first place)
He also said that I screwed myself by failing to resolve the situation and letting it get into collections (obvious in hindsight

) and if they wouldn't answer my letters to my satisfaction then I should have taken legal action against them and forced the issue to be resolved by the courts.
Since I did ignore it for so long the lawyer informed me that I would also be liable for interest since 2002. The collection company was saying that I owed some $3,800 plus court costs because they had been tacking on every little monthly fee, penalty and maximum interest rate (24%) that they could think of from '02- present.
I found out exactly what is so valuable about a lawyer: he's seen this a million times before and he can tell you how it's going to turn out. He told me to negotiate with the company's lawyer and it will come down to competing documents. I ended up settling for the amount of what I legally owed the original creditors (a
lot less than what they claimed I owed) plus 10% interest. If I had taken care of this properly back in '02, the courts would likely have decided this same result except I wouldn't have to pay interest and I wouldn't have a stupid collection on my credit report. Oh well, I learned a lesson.
So what have I learned? :
-Don't ignore a legal problem just because it's too much of a hassle or expense to take care of right away. Just do it.
-Like it or not, lawyers are valuable. You are paying them for their knowledge and experience in an environment that is both alien and hazardous to the average citizen.
- In civil disputes over money, it's usually not about who is right and who is wrong, it's about lawyers making a cost benefit analysis to determine how much something is worth and settling for that amount.
And one other miscellaneous thing my lawyer said that I thought was interesting:
-- Lawyers, and especially judges, don't want to hear you talk - they want to see documents. They only time they want to hear you talk is if you are saying "please refer to this document".
I'm sure there are some lessons that I missed, but this whole thing has tired me out and I'm not that smart to begin with, so it'll have to do.
