Spelling counts

[emor]

oops

[drteeth]

oof.

[emor]

[standupright]

awesome.

reminds me of this

[rarisgod]

Originally Posted by standupright

awesome.

reminds me of this

[sloasdaylight]

[bassteban]

Originally Posted by rarisgod

think...

[Pilgrim]

Lack of education really DOES disqualify you for some jobs - in fact, most of them.

[machine gewehr]

Bobby Cocks for president!

[rarisgod]

Originally Posted by bassteban

think...

Is it supposed to say "underneath that"? If so, I don't understand why. That seems like a weird thing to say.

[drteeth]

Originally Posted by rarisgod

Is it supposed to say "underneath that"? If so, I don't understand why. That seems like a weird thing to say.

Think some more.

[bassteban]

Originally Posted by rarisgod

Is it supposed to say "underneath that"? If so, I don't understand why. That seems like a weird thing to say.

Imagine you're working in a bakery. Someone walks in, hands you a note & says 'I want this on a nice cake.'

On the note:
Best Wishes Suzanne
underneat that
We will miss you

Get it?

[Pilgrim]

AH!

Desired message:

Best Wishes Suzanne
We will miss you

Second line of text is to be positioned underneath the first line of text.

[GregC]

I hope the bakery worker responded with a note that read "wut? this isnt english class im not riting a paper here you spelling nazis need 2 chill."

[bassteban]

The misspelling of the word *underneath* is simply a confusing bonus.

[rarisgod]

Originally Posted by bassteban

The misspelling of the word *underneath* is simply a confusing bonus.

This is what I looked into, rather than the fact that I expected someone would write directions instead of just drawing it out, assuming that these cake workers can figure out that if you write for them:

Best wishes Suzanne
We will miss you

that they won't write

Best wishes Suzanne we will miss you (which would no doubt require two cakes...in which case, bonus)

I guess I assume too little stupidity in the world. I should know better.
Sorry for my confusion!