Quote:
Originally Posted by martijn_2m Thanks a lot. Will listen a few times carefully. What can you tell me about the DI part of this unit compared to a JDI Radial passive DI? |
I really wouldn't get too caught up in which DI will be better as you are already sending a low impedance signal to the board. The DI's main function is to interface an unbalanced high impedance signal to the balanced low impedance input of a mixer or recording console. Since you are already using 2 preamps your signal is already low impedance. As far as balanced signals go they are really meant to reduce the noise that is created when you boost the gain for a microphone over a long cable run. Microphone level is generally considered -30dB, instrument level is -10dB and line level can be 0dB to+4dB and beyond. Without knowing the specific specs of your preamps I can conservatively guess your output is at least 0dB. No problem there.
I can't really comment on the other manufacturers products though I'm sure they are excellent. Our Para Driver is really a floor version of our rackmount RPM preamp. I guess the main difference the PDDI would have is its input impedance is 4.7megOhm and was designed to work with instruments that utilize piezo pickups. These pickups have very high impedance and can sound harsh and quacky if the input impedance is incorrect. Now if your bass is active this may not be an issue.
You seem most concerned about the DI aspect here but in general most acoustic instruments tend to be somewhat problematic as far as frequency response and feedback are concerned. That is where the sweepable semi-parametric EQ comes in handy. As I recall the Aguilar unit has this capability as well. Whether our PDDI will work better for you is obviously something you must decide for yourself.