Quote:
Originally Posted by warwick.hoy
EDIT: To clarify,...I'm not saying that you are wrong about the LS-2 being buffered. All BOSS Compact pedals are buffered. I'm also not saying that your tone may be more pleasing to you not using the LS-2 as a blend. What I am saying is that there is likely some other factor contributing to your tone being more pleasing to you outside of removing the LS-2 from your chain. Perhaps you inadvertently removed a ground loop,...or you signal path is shortened to limit the natural capacitance that long cable runs have.
For my signal chain,...the main bass signal is very short,....Bass->LS-2->TU-2->Amp. I essentially have a buffer at the beginning and the end of my signal chain. I would go so far as to say that my tone is "ballsier" than it was when I was running a more traditional one pedal after the other signal chain. In my current pedal board configuration my rig is noticeably quieter than it was in previous iterations. While I wasn't considering the possible tone improvement while redoing my pedal board this is a happy accident that I'm quite excited about.
YMMV  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by warwick.hoy True Bypass doesn't necessarily equate to clearer tone.  |
Mega-giant-huge TOTALLY AGREE!
I have been using mega-tricked-out modular synth gear as paralleling gear, and I've recently discovered that the LS-2 provides some functionality and ability that all the synth modules and all the king's men cannot reproduce. It's a wonderful device.
When some folks complain about "non-true-bypass" pedals creating issues, many times it's more about another problem. Processor order and ground loop issues create a hundred times more tone suckage problems that buffered bypass does.
But industry hype has branded True Bypass as the 2nd coming of the Next Best Thing. True Bypass can actually be a willing partner in tone suckage in some cases, actually aiding and abetting tone suckage by assisting Signal Chain Length Capacitance problems.
Sorry for the zombie-thread resurrection. ~yikes~!