Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Effects [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-01-2008, 04:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Boss OC-2 with active basses?

Sign in to disble this ad
I've had a Boss OC-2 for quite some time now. I've come to notice that it works great with my passive Fender but doesn't track as well with my active Ristola 6 string. Anyone have the same issue? Is there an octave pedal that sounds like the OC-2 but can work better with active basses? I need an octave pedal with the option of only getting the one octave below signal without the direct level. I believe MI audio is coming out with their own octave pedal that I'm keeping my eyes peeled for. Any suggestions? Thanks.
  #2  
Old 06-01-2008, 06:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
I've found that octave pedals are more sensitive to the 'sound' coming from the bass than anything else. My OC-2 works best on the neck pickup of my passive bass, works ok when the blend control is centred, but works terribly on the bridge pickup.

Likewise, if I boost too much treble on my active bass the OC-2 starts getting upset. A mild midrange boost makes it track better.

And then there's the whole issue that no two octave pedals are alike. You could plug in five different Boss OC-2's once each over five days and you'd get twenty five different results. They are fickle and highly variable. It's just how they are.
__________________
niftydog

"My feet itch." Mike Patton
  #3  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
the oc-2 is the best sounding suboctave out there. i use active basses, too..but you need to be carefull. with a hot signal, its just not friendly. you can lower your volume or just play softly. i prefer the sound of just playing softly..tracks just fine.
__________________
"a man who counts his chickens before they hatch is wise..how can you count chickens the way they run amuck.."
  #4  
Old 06-01-2008, 10:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomvelsor View Post
the oc-2 is the best sounding suboctave out there. i use active basses, too..but you need to be carefull. with a hot signal, its just not friendly. you can lower your volume or just play softly. i prefer the sound of just playing softly..tracks just fine.
I do find it to work best with a lighter touch for sure.
  #5  
Old 06-01-2008, 10:57 PM
Jared Lash's Avatar
I'm a tumbler, born under punches
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California
Supporting Member
I don't have an OC-2, but an EBS Octabass and I find it actually tracks better with an active bass than a passive one. That said, it's tracking is nothing to write home about. I have yet to find an octaver that has great tracking and sounds good. Every one I've tried is a compromise of some sort.

I get the best results when I use the same plucking technique that I employ for reggae or dub stuff - mainly getting big round notes near (or above) the end of the fretboard with the neck pickup primarily.
__________________
The Talkbass Stambaugh gallery

PM me with any new submissions.
  #6  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigO View Post
I get the best results when I use the same plucking technique that I employ for reggae or dub stuff - mainly getting big round notes near (or above) the end of the fretboard...
I find this to be true with my active bass, but with the passive J I can dig in and it still tracks well. I mainly have an issue with the lower octave trailing off early with the active bass.
  #7  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:09 PM
Registered User

endorsing artist Lakland basses
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
if money is no object then go for the electro harmonix POG, the polyphonic octave generator, it tracks well with any type of bass and has enough different options to make your bass sound like a pipe organ.
__________________
I can only offer this saying: I solemnly swear to play the root, the whole root, and nothing but the root, so help me Dusty Hill.

Jah blessed Reggae bassist club founder
  #8  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jluckie3 View Post
if money is no object then go for the electro harmonix POG, the polyphonic octave generator, it tracks well with any type of bass and has enough different options to make your bass sound like a pipe organ.
I don't need anything near that involved...and it's way too big for my board....but thanks.
  #9  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:34 PM
Jared Lash's Avatar
I'm a tumbler, born under punches
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by emjazz View Post
I don't need anything near that involved...and it's way too big for my board....but thanks.
Even the micro?



My problem with both POGs (micro and big mamma jamma) were that I just didn't care for the sound. On the compromise side though, they do track pretty flawlessly.
__________________
The Talkbass Stambaugh gallery

PM me with any new submissions.
  #10  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigO View Post
Even the micro?



My problem with both POGs (micro and big mamma jamma) were that I just didn't care for the sound. On the compromise side though, they do track pretty flawlessly.
Interesting....I'll have to check that one out. If it sounds much different than the OC-2 than I'm not really that interested though.
  #11  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wausau, WI
Send a message via AIM to OhThePeacock
Quote:
Originally Posted by emjazz View Post
Interesting....I'll have to check that one out. If it sounds much different than the OC-2 than I'm not really that interested though.
The sub-octave on the POG seems a little bit brighter than the OC-2. The only other real difference is that the m. POG has an organ like octave up and the OC-2 has a double octave down. IMO octave up is quite a bit more usfull than a double octave down.
__________________
Poney.bandcamp.com <--my band
  #12  
Old 06-02-2008, 12:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhThePeacock View Post
The sub-octave on the POG seems a little bit brighter than the OC-2. The only other real difference is that the m. POG has an organ like octave up and the OC-2 has a double octave down. IMO octave up is quite a bit more usfull than a double octave down.
Yeah, I kind of like the gritty, darker tone of the OC-2 as opposed to the cleaner, brighter sound of others...but I assume that's the difference between analog and digital. There's a compromise either way I guess.
  #13  
Old 06-02-2008, 12:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wausau, WI
Send a message via AIM to OhThePeacock
The Foxrox Octron has the same controlls as the Micro POG and is gritty, however it may be to gritty for your needs. It's an octave down fuzz and I don't know If you want a completely clean octave or not so I figured I'd throw that out there.
__________________
Poney.bandcamp.com <--my band
  #14  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chugiak, AK
I run my EMG loaded jazz into an OC-2 with all controls cranked on the bass and the OC-2 controls all 12o'clock and it tracks better with the active EMGs than with my passive Warwick. I can get it to track pretty well down to the low G.
__________________
"There's nary a beast that can outrun a greased-up scotsman!" Acoustic club member #32
  #15  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhThePeacock View Post
The Foxrox Octron has the same controlls as the Micro POG and is gritty, however it may be to gritty for your needs. It's an octave down fuzz and I don't know If you want a completely clean octave or not so I figured I'd throw that out there.
Just looking for a clean (no fuzz) octave, but thanks.
  #16  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by GabeN View Post
I run my EMG loaded jazz into an OC-2 with all controls cranked on the bass and the OC-2 controls all 12o'clock and it tracks better with the active EMGs than with my passive Warwick. I can get it to track pretty well down to the low G.
Interesting, I've also been wondering if it prefers single coil pickups to humbuckers....maybe that's silly but I've certainly been curious about that.
  #17  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:29 AM
TaySte_2000's Avatar
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Mojohand, Tone Factor, Subdecay, Overwater, Matamp
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manchester, UK
Send a message via AIM to TaySte_2000 Send a message via MSN to TaySte_2000
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by emjazz View Post
Just looking for a clean (no fuzz) octave, but thanks.
Its not an octave down fuzz at all, its a standard octaver sound very similar to that of the analog units in the 80's tone wise such as the OC-2 and the Octoplus I even heard a rumour that there some similarities in designs, the octave down is clean but sort of gritty, not distorted or fuzzy or even what some might consider overdriven just not as clean as say the micro pog which to me sounds very flat and boring even though it tracks better and can handle chords.

If you check out clips of the octron in the wiki I think you'll be very impressed it's what sold me on mine and I use it loads
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasted
It's really easy to post quickly up here from my pedestal.
Brand New Music Video
  #18  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:30 AM
Commreman's Avatar
Faith, Family, Fitness, and Frets
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Supporting Member
I've been using my OC-2 for damn near 20 years with a wide variety of basses, both active and passive, single coil and humbucker, etc., and have had no issues whatsoever. Concerning tracking, I will agree that it breaks up on the lowest notes, but big deal - that's not really what I'm using it for. You must use the right "touch" to get the most out of it. Different basses require different settings, so just experiment with each bass. I also use compression in the signal following the pedal, and this helps as well.

Concerning the Micro POG, it's a completely different animal - think of the outro of "Jeremy" by Pearl Jam for a good representation of what this unit sounds like (even though that track was done on a 12 string bass, it's what the POG sounds like). For the OC-2, listen to "Sledgehammer" by Peter Gabriel.
__________________
Fender FSR Hot Rod Club Member #12
Fender MIA Club member #124
  #19  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commreman View Post
I've been using my OC-2 for damn near 20 years with a wide variety of basses, both active and passive, single coil and humbucker, etc., and have had no issues whatsoever. Concerning tracking, I will agree that it breaks up on the lowest notes, but big deal - that's not really what I'm using it for. You must use the right "touch" to get the most out of it. Different basses require different settings, so just experiment with each bass. I also use compression in the signal following the pedal, and this helps as well.

Concerning the Micro POG, it's a completely different animal - think of the outro of "Jeremy" by Pearl Jam for a good representation of what this unit sounds like (even though that track was done on a 12 string bass, it's what the POG sounds like). For the OC-2, listen to "Sledgehammer" by Peter Gabriel.
Thanks for this....it most certainly could be that I expect to play my active 6 the same way as my J bass and get the same results from the pedal. The J definately works better with the OC-2 as far as tracking and playing with different touches, but I may need to play in a specific way to get the 6 to work best with it. I'll experiment more.....as far as compression, that's not something that I'll ever use for myself.
  #20  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaySte_2000 View Post
Its not an octave down fuzz at all, its a standard octaver sound very similar to that of the analog units in the 80's tone wise such as the OC-2 and the Octoplus I even heard a rumour that there some similarities in designs, the octave down is clean but sort of gritty, not distorted or fuzzy or even what some might consider overdriven just not as clean as say the micro pog which to me sounds very flat and boring even though it tracks better and can handle chords.

If you check out clips of the octron in the wiki I think you'll be very impressed it's what sold me on mine and I use it loads
Gotcha, I'll go check those clips out. Any idea when the MI Audio Octave is coming out?
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.