|  | 
06-24-2011, 03:18 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SF (North) Bay Area | | | Boss TU3 vs OC2 buffer
Sign in to disble this ad
I am currently running my OC2 (Octaver) at the front end of my effects signal pathway and am wondering about the buffering characteristics of the OC2 vs my TU3, which I run at the back end.
In other words, do both pedals use the same buffer?
Last edited by Matt Dean : 06-25-2011 at 12:19 AM.
| 
06-25-2011, 05:32 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SF (North) Bay Area | | | 63 views and nobody has an opinion about the buffers in these pedals?
Remarkable. | 
06-25-2011, 06:27 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Grand Rapids, MI | | | I'm pretty sure the TU-3 is true bypass, so it wouldn't have a buffer. But someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by uprightben I love academic writings that point out how cool I am. | | 
06-25-2011, 07:20 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SF (North) Bay Area | | | No, the TU3 has both a bypassed jack and also has a buffered jack. | 
06-25-2011, 07:51 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Pittsburgh, PA | | | Apparently, Boss doesn't have much info out there about what buffers they have used or still do. I would think the most modern of the two pedals would have the more advanced buffer, but this is merely speculation and not based on any solid info. | 
06-25-2011, 08:23 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SF (North) Bay Area | | | Well, I'm running my OC2 first in the chain... and I've tried the TU3 first in the chain, and I really can't tell much of a difference. | 
06-25-2011, 11:49 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Toronto, Canada | | | I'm not surprised. I could hardly even tell the difference between the bypasses in a true bypass Rat and a buffered bypass Peavey HFD-2 (Rat clone-ish) from the 80s.
__________________
blastronautband.bandcamp.com - noisyrockmetalfreejazz
falconpunch.bandcamp.com - liveelectronicadrum&bass
| 
06-26-2011, 12:30 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Norway | | | In a thread about boss buffers I were telling about a conversation I had with a boss employee who assured me that the buffer in the TU-3 was the same as used in the TU-2. But this other guy, the OP as the matter of fact, seemed pretty sure that there was a new and improved buffer in the TU-3, as well as other new releases..
But anyways, I don't think there is too much of a difference. And IMO certainly not to a degree that should affect the placement of your pedals. Do you not like your OC-2 going into fuzz? | 
06-26-2011, 12:38 AM
|  | Ampeeeeeeg \o/ | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Israel | | | I have no idea about this, I just know the TU-3 does not have true-bypass. That's the reason I got the Korg Pitchblack instead...
__________________
MIJ Precision 1988 -> Ampeg SVT7PRO
| 
06-26-2011, 03:39 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Leeds, UK | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Matt Dean Well, I'm running my OC2 first in the chain... and I've tried the TU3 first in the chain, and I really can't tell much of a difference. | If you can't tell the difference then surely it doesn't matter?
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by Darkstrike If I kicked my dog in time to the music his cries would be better 'singing'. | | 
06-26-2011, 03:56 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ireland | | Not sure about the quality of buffer - but both pedals (actually all Boss pedals AFAIK) have a 1 M-ohm input impedance - which has helped my upright pickups immensely. Hope that's of some use.
__________________
Epifani Club #59 Atheist Bass Player #116
| 
06-26-2011, 08:59 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: San Franciso Bay Area | | | The buffer isn't going to make much of a difference in a two pedal setup. All the "tone suck" comes when you have a pedal board full of buffered pedals.
Btw, why do you put your tuner at the end of the chain? Don't you have to click off the OC2 everytime you want to tune? FWIW, I always put my tuner first, then it requires only one footswitch to tune.
__________________
Rickenbacker Club #346, US Peavey Club #176, Ugly Bass Club #4, Electra/Westone Club #17, California Bassists Club #61
| 
06-26-2011, 10:16 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SF (North) Bay Area | | Quote:
Originally Posted by GHI Do you not like your OC-2 going into fuzz? | My signal processing pathway is Boss OC2>W&C Phat Phuck B>Darkglass B3K>W&C Tall Font Russian>IE Oxide>IE Xerograph>HBE Psilocybe>Boss TU3... so, I guess my answer to this question is: yes. Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.hughes Not sure about the quality of buffer - but both pedals (actually all Boss pedals AFAIK) have a 1 M-ohm input impedance - which has helped my upright pickups immensely. Hope that's of some use. | Thanks, this does help and was exactly the kind of response I was hoping for. Quote:
Originally Posted by audiomitch The buffer isn't going to make much of a difference in a two pedal setup. All the "tone suck" comes when you have a pedal board full of buffered pedals.
Btw, why do you put your tuner at the end of the chain? Don't you have to click off the OC2 everytime you want to tune? FWIW, I always put my tuner first, then it requires only one footswitch to tune. | I put the TU3 at the end of the chain because I put the OC2 at the front of the chain, so I can feed it the cleanest bass signal, which I think improves the octave output.
All the pedals between the boss pedals are true bypass. And, yes I do turn off all my pedals when I tune... it doesn't that big a deal to me.
Last edited by Matt Dean : 06-26-2011 at 10:23 AM.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |