Carl Martin Opto vs Rothwell Love Squeeze
I want to get a compressor pedal and have narrowed it down to the 2 above. Been reading a lot of stuff on these on here and elswehere and would like to know how you would comare them.
Is the Love Squeeze worth the extra money?
I would like a compressor for the sound and effect and I am wondering if the Love Squeeze is maybe too transparent. That said - I dont want it to sound overly processsed and intrusive either.
Does the RLS compress well at max level?
How does it sound eq/tone wise to the CM Opto?
I have a passive Yamaha BB414 mostly using the P pup which I intend to DI only at gigs and prob recordings as I like a completly clean full range sound.
Have you read ovnilab.com?
Even after going through Ovnilab you'll be all the keener to buy both and work through them for yourself. ;) Good luck!
Yeah read both reviews (amoungst others, hence why I like idea of either of these 2) - just wanted more of a direct comparrison between the two if anyone has had both.
Yeah if money was no object id just do that HeveyJazz77 :P cheers.
If you want ANY tonal effect or ANY noticeable squishy effect then you do not want the Rothwell. The Rothwell is smaller, and has clearer highs; the Carl Martin has more control over the response.
Thanks Bongo - I think il go with the CM in that case :)
On another note i noticed that the newer versions of the Punch Factory have a DI out on them which would be something of use to me as I DI to the board a lot and will need to get my own DI soon anyway.
I know you havn't reviewed this articular model but if it is electronically the same or simular to the older one would this be a good compression device to use or would the CM still be the better choice?
My advise is get the best DI you can afford if you care at all about the sound that is going to the FOH.
Nice one guys, thanks for the info - CM on its way :)
|All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.