|  | | 
05-06-2009, 09:44 AM
| | | | Good wah pedal to use?????
Sign in to disble this ad
A few months ago I bought a dunlop crybaby wah pedal from guitar center.....yeah i bought it from guitar center (i hate that place now). The pedal continuously made a weird noise, I can't really explain it, so I returned it and got my money back (Thank God really). I'm now interested in a wah pedal again and I'm looking into a Morley wah pedal. Anyone think that morely has a good wah pedal or not?? | 
05-06-2009, 10:01 AM
|  | I'm a tumbler, born under punches | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Northern California | | | Depends on what "good" means to you.
If I were playing hard rock/metal or wanted to cop a Cliff Burton sound, I'd go with a Morley.
Despite it's relatively poor bypass, the Dunlop 105q would be my pick for funk.
For versatility, I liked the Ibanez Weeping Demon and though I haven't tried it myself, the Wilson 12 position QWah looks really intriguing to me. | 
05-06-2009, 10:13 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Bloomington MN | | I have done my homework when it comes to wah pedals and my top recommendation is the Wilson Effects 12 position Q/wah with vintage specs. Wilson effects also has many other models to choose from and they all sound awesome. I have a dunlop 105q and it sucks tone like crazy. I would only use it with a bypass loop. I do like that it doesn't have a switch, but sometimes it hesitates when I want it off. http://www.wilsoneffects.com/ | 
05-06-2009, 10:17 AM
| | | | The Weeping Deamon is very versitile. The low boost knob helps keep the low end from dropping out when you engage it. Only problem is it is a little bulky. | 
05-06-2009, 10:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | | | Another vote for the Wilson. Very tweakable. Smooth, funky, and toss some dirt after it.... ohhh yeaaahhhhhhh.
Mine is the 12 stage Qwah. (not vintage spec).
__________________
You gotta be unstoppable, un-karate-choppable. Quote:
Originally Posted by MatticusMania Im slightly turned on by your cleaver stroking anime girl avatar. | | 
05-06-2009, 10:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan | | | I've had a Morley Wah, it was the "Classic Wah". They rock. When I get another Wah, it'll be a Morley. | 
05-06-2009, 10:24 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: United Kingdom | | | I've had 2 Morley power wahs and the demon. They are all good at what they do but if i was to buy a way again it would be the wilson
__________________
Lefty Union #118 (Play Righty), Praise & Worship #144, I don't has a Cream Pie #1
| 
05-06-2009, 10:25 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Fort Wayne, IN | | | I just got a Morley Wah, but I have yet to test it out...lol I'll let you know when I give it some time...
__________________
Ampeg Club Member #62, Geddy Lee Jazz Club Member #9, Fender Precision Bass Club Member #39, Post-punk/New Wave Bassists Club #40, SansAmp VT-Bass Owners Club #4
| 
05-06-2009, 10:43 AM
| | | Quote: |
I have a dunlop 105q and it sucks tone like crazy. I would only use it with a bypass loop. I do like that it doesn't have a switch, but sometimes it hesitates when I want it off.
| I have a 105q also. I like it although I do have to adjust the volume knob on it frequently and I have to add some treble to it but it does work well with my EHX microsynth. Been getting some cool sounds out of that combo. | 
05-06-2009, 10:58 AM
| | | | How about the EBS wah? I'm pretty sure its designed specifically for bass. They also have the Stanley Clarke sig. wah coming out soon which looks pretty cool. | 
05-06-2009, 11:02 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: London, England | | Quote:
Originally Posted by manmountain8 I do like that it doesn't have a switch, but sometimes it hesitates when I want it off.
[/url] | 105q has an internal pot that'll stop that hesitation, if you remove the bottom plate, its the one nearest the heel i think.
Its the least bulky, and i love it, but i find getting the balance between Volume and Q tricky, and have ruined many a good song by using it with a MXR Blowtorch run into it and ended up melting faces.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by behndy "big and awkwardly powered". sounds like ALL EHX gear. or my junk. | | 
05-06-2009, 11:03 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: right behind you... | | Morley dual wah is twice as nice 
__________________
Just add a bunch of smiley faces and agree with the OP if you don't want to have the thread closed.
| 
05-06-2009, 02:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Wakefield, UK | | | I've got a Morley Power Wah and it sounds great. I borrowed my friend's crybaby and it just seemed to hum all the time. I can't say I've tried the Wilson but I can definitely recommend Morleys.
Oh and they're built like tanks!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by kevteop For all we know, there could be an army of beautiful virgins wandering door-to-door with photos of me, in a desperate attempt to mate me to death. | | 
05-06-2009, 02:35 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RHCP250 How about the EBS wah? I'm pretty sure its designed specifically for bass. They also have the Stanley Clarke sig. wah coming out soon which looks pretty cool. | The WahOne is pretty darn cool for sure. The bypass, unfortunately, is no better than the dunlop - it's a standard wah pedal mechanical bypass (not typical of EBS). It is designed for bass and it sounds great. The multiple modes and switches (which appear to be streamlined and expanded on the StanWah) offer a huge amount of versatility. | 
05-06-2009, 02:49 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: West Covina (LA), SoCal | | | I also just got a Morley Dual Wah in a nifty trade I made, though I wont get to try it out until tomorrow at practice. I'll let you know on Friday what I think of it.
__________________
Bassist for Starveya - www.reverbnation.com/starveya
Sat June 9th @ Shamrocks in Chino Hills - 10pm
Bassist - Veg#33, Buddhist#11, LGBT#5
| 
05-06-2009, 02:52 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Georgetown, South Carolina | | | I got the Snarling Dogs Bootsy Collins Wah (I tend to ignore the fuzz aspect of the pedal) and that is a pretty versatile pedal. It's mainly for funk, but you can adjust the pedal to get some pretty neat sounds out of it. | 
05-06-2009, 09:22 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Iowa | | | I'd say the Dunlop 105q. Personally, I find the bypass to be fine and can't hear any tone suck at all. I also really like how it doesn't have a switch you have to press to engage it, although that could be a plus or minus in your book. | 
05-06-2009, 11:20 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Arizona | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins The WahOne is pretty darn cool for sure. The bypass, unfortunately, is no better than the dunlop - it's a standard wah pedal mechanical bypass (not typical of EBS). It is designed for bass and it sounds great. The multiple modes and switches (which appear to be streamlined and expanded on the StanWah) offer a huge amount of versatility. | I can attest to all this. I do notice a little tone suck, but I personally do not think it is that bad. But then I haven't tried out the Dunlop.... It is, however, amazingly tweekable and I love it for that. | 
05-06-2009, 11:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Bowling Green, KY | | | Wilson Freaker Wah.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by nad My biggest pedal is on my tiny board though, mostly because I enjoy the overwhelming dichotomy that is life. | I play rock music.
| 
05-07-2009, 03:20 AM
| | | | +1 for the Ibanez Demon. Great bypass, great tone, lots of possible configurations. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |