Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Effects [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2008, 03:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Send a message via Yahoo to r0ckb0tt0m
Question got any good loopers in mind that could complement the line 6 x3L?

Sign in to disble this ad
from what i gather, the x3L doesn't come with a looper/phraser.

does anyone have any good loopers in mind that could complement the line 6 x3L?
  #2  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:27 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Coast of Canada
Send a message via AIM to Nyarlathotep Send a message via MSN to Nyarlathotep
Since the x3 is stereo, you need something thats stereo.

The DigiTech looper sums to mono

RC-20XL is mono

RC-50 is huge

The looper, JM-4 iirc, from Line 6 would be perfect as long as you dont mind paying for more modelling lol

I did a search on this a while ago.....
  #3  
Old 05-09-2008, 10:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Send a message via Yahoo to r0ckb0tt0m
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielTulip View Post
Since the x3 is stereo, you need something thats stereo.

The DigiTech looper sums to mono

RC-20XL is mono

RC-50 is huge

The looper, JM-4 iirc, from Line 6 would be perfect as long as you dont mind paying for more modelling lol

I did a search on this a while ago.....
thanks. i thought the rc50 is a looper of epic proportions. it is massive. (and did i mention that it's more expensive?).

well, i took a peek of the line 6 jm4 and IT IS AWESOME. and finally, a "true" SD card slot (whew! after a long while, somebody finally picked up on this. and, i mean, who else is using CF cards nowadays anyway).

so i'm definitely gonna hook myself up to one of these. i don't really care paying for more modeling; i just wanna get a good clean (stereo) looper no matter what other bonuses are in it.

THANKS A MANY!!!
  #4  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:03 AM
Bryan R. Tyler's Avatar
TalkBass: Usurping My Practice Time Since 2002

Endorsing Artist: Lyt Pedalboards Beta tester: Source Audio
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Connecticut
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielTulip View Post
Since the x3 is stereo, you need something thats stereo.
Well, you certainly don't NEED the looper to be stereo- if you're running into a single amp anyways, the stereo function of the X3 is negated.

I will say that stereo effects into a stereo looper (with a stereo amp rig of course) sounds pretty damn awesome. I messed around with that for a while, and having your loops pan and your effects ping pong or running different effects into each side really fills out the sound when playing solo.
  #5  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Send a message via Yahoo to r0ckb0tt0m
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan R. Tyler View Post
Well, you certainly don't NEED the looper to be stereo- if you're running into a single amp anyways, the stereo function of the X3 is negated.

I will say that stereo effects into a stereo looper (with a stereo amp rig of course) sounds pretty damn awesome. I messed around with that for a while, and having your loops pan and your effects ping pong or running different effects into each side really fills out the sound when playing solo.
very well said. appreciate your input. i will be keeping that in mind as well. thanks so much!
  #6  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:19 AM
Bryan R. Tyler's Avatar
TalkBass: Usurping My Practice Time Since 2002

Endorsing Artist: Lyt Pedalboards Beta tester: Source Audio
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Connecticut
One other thing to keep in mind is that the save/store function on many of these loopers is not particularly necessary. When I first got my Looperlative, I thought that having no storage space might be an inconvenience. What I found though is that looping is really a performance thing, and you don't need to save loops unless you're without a recording interface. Playing back your pre-recorded loops is basically like hitting play on a CD player- it's not particularly creative or exciting to hear or play along with.

Saving loops is cool to practice with; for example, if you need to learn to solo over 10 different chord progressions over the course of a week, keeping those progressions saved to play over can be a handy way to practice. But again, this is only if you don't have any sort of recording interface- otherwise, you can just record them onto your PC and burn a CD of it or just hit Play.

So savable loops are good as a practice tool, but when it comes to creating music or playing live, they aren't really necessary at all.
  #7  
Old 05-09-2008, 12:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Send a message via Yahoo to r0ckb0tt0m
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan R. Tyler View Post
One other thing to keep in mind is that the save/store function on many of these loopers is not particularly necessary. When I first got my Looperlative, I thought that having no storage space might be an inconvenience. What I found though is that looping is really a performance thing, and you don't need to save loops unless you're without a recording interface. Playing back your pre-recorded loops is basically like hitting play on a CD player- it's not particularly creative or exciting to hear or play along with.

Saving loops is cool to practice with; for example, if you need to learn to solo over 10 different chord progressions over the course of a week, keeping those progressions saved to play over can be a handy way to practice. But again, this is only if you don't have any sort of recording interface- otherwise, you can just record them onto your PC and burn a CD of it or just hit Play.

So savable loops are good as a practice tool, but when it comes to creating music or playing live, they aren't really necessary at all.
i don't have any of those hi-tech recording interfaces or what have you. but i have like stacks of 1-2gb sd cards (from my 'short-lived' photography days) and an sd card reader. so considering these, i thought maybe the memory thing could be the way to go when considering loopers. but i will still definitely think about other stuff that's out there that could be a match (or close match) to the jm4.

many thanks for the valuable insight. glad i threw this question out here.
  #8  
Old 05-09-2008, 12:25 PM
Bryan R. Tyler's Avatar
TalkBass: Usurping My Practice Time Since 2002

Endorsing Artist: Lyt Pedalboards Beta tester: Source Audio
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Connecticut
You don't need anything high-tech to record, mind you- a firewire interface can be under $100 and Audacity is a great little recording program that's completely free and about the easiest-to-use recording software ever. Just something to keep in mind
  #9  
Old 05-09-2008, 12:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Send a message via Yahoo to r0ckb0tt0m
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan R. Tyler View Post
You don't need anything high-tech to record, mind you- a firewire interface can be under $100 and Audacity is a great little recording program that's completely free and about the easiest-to-use recording software ever. Just something to keep in mind
wow. bryan.. you're the man!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.