Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Effects [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Send a message via AIM to Thunderscreech Send a message via MSN to Thunderscreech Send a message via Yahoo to Thunderscreech Send a message via Skype™ to Thunderscreech
Making this Circuit more bass-friendy

Sign in to disble this ad
This is a Boss HM-2 Circuit. What do I need to to do to adjust the tone controls to make it more suited to the bass range?

Edit: BLARGH!!!! Attached as PDF.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	bosshm2.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	24.7 KB
ID:	116711  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf boss-HM-2.pdf (46.6 KB, 25 views)
__________________
Returned in a limited capacity due to noise

Last edited by Thunderscreech : 01-29-2009 at 10:46 AM.
  #2  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:57 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Coast of Canada
Send a message via AIM to Nyarlathotep Send a message via MSN to Nyarlathotep
Subscribed
  #3  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:07 AM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
Is it worth it? I heard a jazz bass played through a humphrey modded HM-2 into an SVT and it sounded pretty cruddy. i'm sure somebody can do a better mod but i dunno, I'm not much of an HM-2 fan.
  #4  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:12 AM
bigchiefbc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins View Post
Is it worth it? I heard a jazz bass played through a humphrey modded HM-2 into an SVT and it sounded pretty cruddy. i'm sure somebody can do a better mod but i dunno, I'm not much of an HM-2 fan.
I've never personally played one, but Spanky's video demo of the HM-2 certainly sounded pretty damn awesome to me. I'm interested to see if this thread goes anywhere
  #5  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:20 AM
bongomania's Avatar
OVNIFX

EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PDX, OR
GOLD Supporting Member
I've been squinting at the teeny-tiny type on the schemo for a few minutes now, and I don't have any particularly intelligent suggestions. You could always try the gorilla approach and increase the value of some of the key caps, like the two 47nF's at the input could be replaced with 22 to 47uF's. Or I'm also looking at where it says "dist", and also near the diode arrays, and in the low EQ module, there are a number of spots where throwing in some different cap values would be worth the experiment. If you're feeling particularly adventurous, replace all the caps in the audio path with sockets, and then just swap values like mad with no further soldering.
__________________
Compressor, preamp, and EQ FAQ <--read first!
Compressor reviews / My blog / Twitter / >> Instrument cable reviews <<
New Exar Bass Compressor coming in late June/early July!
  #6  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: sheffield, england
Send a message via MSN to roflol
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongomania View Post
I've been squinting at the teeny-tiny type on the schemo for a few minutes now, and I don't have any particularly intelligent suggestions. You could always try the gorilla approach and increase the value of some of the key caps, like the two 47nF's at the input could be replaced with 22 to 47uF's. Or I'm also looking at where it says "dist", and also near the diode arrays, and in the low EQ module, there are a number of spots where throwing in some different cap values would be worth the experiment. If you're feeling particularly adventurous, replace all the caps in the audio path with sockets, and then just swap values like mad with no further soldering.
changing the 47 to a 47uf would make everything a bit full on gain wise and very squishy also more gain means less low end. I'd recomend changing the input cap to .068uf or greater .1uf being ideal.
Also change the .047uf in parallel with the negative feedback to anything up to 47uf (negative to ground, positive towards the opamp) and also the cap in the negative feedback loop of the tonestack could be changed to a larger value
__________________
aye
  #7  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hair Noddles
Doubling the input(47n) and output(10micro) caps will increase the bass freq going in to and out of the circuit. You can also replace ceramic caps with equivelent poly film. This will help with fedelity.
Oh and don't forget to change the LED to a cool color.
__________________
I can resist anything ...except temptation.
  #8  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:01 PM
bongomania's Avatar
OVNIFX

EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PDX, OR
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by roflol View Post
changing the 47 to a 47uf would make everything a bit full on gain wise and very squishy also more gain means less low end.
Could you explain those statements a bit further? Not sure I understand what you mean.

Edit: by "gain" do you mean distortion, i.e. the gain of the signal going into the diodes?
__________________
Compressor, preamp, and EQ FAQ <--read first!
Compressor reviews / My blog / Twitter / >> Instrument cable reviews <<
New Exar Bass Compressor coming in late June/early July!

Last edited by bongomania : 01-29-2009 at 12:05 PM.
  #9  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Send a message via AIM to Thunderscreech Send a message via MSN to Thunderscreech Send a message via Yahoo to Thunderscreech Send a message via Skype™ to Thunderscreech
Here Is a larger PDF. I seem to be made of fail lately.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Boss hm-2 large.pdf (46.6 KB, 19 views)
__________________
Returned in a limited capacity due to noise
  #10  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:10 PM
pharaohamps's Avatar
Registered User

Owner, Disaster Area Amps
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Send a message via AIM to pharaohamps Send a message via Yahoo to pharaohamps
Supporting Member
The caps around the first FET are probably not going to make a huge difference. IIRC, the bypassed sound has plenty of low-end, and the bypass signal goes through the buffer, too.

Your better bet would probably be to reduce the amount of clipping in the circuit. The HM-2 uses asymmetrical clipping in the main op-amp stage, then follows that up with a pair of series clipping diodes (the 1N270 germanium parts.) The Ge diodes are to simulate the "crossover" distortion of a Class-AB tube amp. Replace the Ge diodes with jumper wires and you'll immediately have a more bass-friendly effect.

The tone controls in the HM-2 are implemented using gyrators (here used as simulated inductors in an LC circuit) and you can change the EQ centers by changing the cap values on them. Double the caps in the Low section to lower the lows to lower than low. Actually, just put an 0.068uf cap in parallel with the 68nf, and replace the 1.5uf with a 3.3uf cap.

See the third gyrator there? IC2B actually makes a midrange control (IC2A is the treble control.) The stock HM-2 setup changes the Treble and Mids at the same time. If you break the connection there and wire in a third pot, you can have a 3-band active tone stack. I built a couple pedals with the exact same EQ setup a few years ago, and it works great.
  #11  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:12 PM
DosiYanarchy's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London, England
Supporting Member
where IS the larger PDF?

FAIL!

hehe
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by behndy View Post
"big and awkwardly powered". sounds like ALL EHX gear. or my junk.
  #12  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Send a message via AIM to Thunderscreech Send a message via MSN to Thunderscreech Send a message via Yahoo to Thunderscreech Send a message via Skype™ to Thunderscreech
Quote:
Originally Posted by DosiYanarchy View Post
where IS the larger PDF?

FAIL!

hehe
Under my second post in this thread....
__________________
Returned in a limited capacity due to noise
  #13  
Old 01-29-2009, 01:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, England
The HM-2 has a very weird tonestack. It only sounds good with the bass on full and the treble at noon. With the treble any lower, all your upper mids and treble disappear, any higher, all your bass and lower mids are gone. Sounds good at the sweet spot though!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.