|  | 
08-08-2009, 09:17 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | Maxon AF-9 v Groove Regulator?
Sign in to disble this ad
Has anyone tested these two side by side? Any thoughts? Is one...sort of better, or are they just two different puppies altogether? | 
08-09-2009, 01:09 AM
|  | Master of Reality | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: San Diego, CA | | | I actually just did this side by side a month or two ago. They both have their advantages and disadvantages, depending on what role you're trying to use your filter for.
In terms of standalone, greasy, funky, filter sounds, the AF-9 was way ahead.
In terms of tweakability, interaction with other pedals, and a transparent tone, the Groove Regulator was much better.
AF-9 was funkier, but much more fussy and had bigger peaks. Groove Regulator was a bit sterile (IMO) in terms of tone, but was much easier to work with despite having more parameter controls available.
I liked both, both are quality pedals but it depends whether you're intending to use it in conjunction with other pedals or as a standalone funk machine.
__________________ BREAKHOUSE - Noise Purveyors of the Highest Order
| 
08-09-2009, 01:13 AM
| | | | I haven't tried the Groove Regulator personally. I will say that from what I can tell, if it's going to be your only filter, it seems like a great one to get. If you have a specific application or intention for your filter, there are more specialized ones that can probably do what they do better than the GR does it, but won't offer you as much versatility. I swear by the Maxon for a funk, but it's definitely not the most versatile filter out there.
__________________
FS: Pigtronix Philosopher's Tone - $105 Shipped
FS: DOD FX-25 (original, no battery cover) - $40
FS: PEAK PGR4 MIDI-Controllable Bypass Looper - $120
| 
08-09-2009, 09:55 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Lincoln, NE | | | which of the 2 is 'wetter'. I sold my old af-9 cause it wasn't 'q-tron' enough and was thinking that the GR would be the ticket for a wetter sound. | 
08-09-2009, 10:05 AM
|  | Master of Reality | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: San Diego, CA | | | AF-9 is "wetter" in that it has more resonance, and larger peaks.
GR is very transparent, for better or worse.
__________________ BREAKHOUSE - Noise Purveyors of the Highest Order
| 
08-09-2009, 03:10 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Diego | | | Agreed- The GR is a little less resonant than the Meatball (with resonance dimed) and significantly less resonant/wet than any of the 'tron's. | 
08-09-2009, 09:55 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Santa Cruz CA | | | having only tried the af-9, i can tell you its pretty wet. its not as wet as a qtron+. i want to check out the prometheus and the original mutron. however, those are kind of costly.
am i the only one who gets a "slight" volume spike out of my af-9?
still, i love my maxon... hmm... i have another idea for a thread... | 
08-09-2009, 09:59 PM
|  | I hate. | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: The state of denial. | | | Nah, when I had an AF-9, it would definitely spike the volume on the peaks.
__________________
I do everything for the children. Tasty, tasty children.
| 
08-10-2009, 12:24 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | Yeah, I've tried the Af-9, and it was a nice filter, (despite the little peaks and whatnot) but I havent been able to try a groove regulator. If theyre popular around TB and sell well second hand, I might pick one up and give it a run.... | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |