MF 101 Vs Q-Tron

rnilson · #1 09-17-2008, 11:14 AM

I am getting a new EV Filter. It is down to Moogerfooger LPF and Q-Tron. How do they compare?
I will be running fuzz and octave down with it mainly. I do electronic, DnB type music.
Thanks.

bongomania · #2 09-17-2008, 12:12 PM

Moog = more versatile and more controllable, but also bigger, requiring a special power supply, and with a poorer bypass.

Tonally they are "different but equal"

Jared Lash · #3 09-17-2008, 02:33 PM

For what you want to do, I think the Moogerfooger suits your needs a lot better.

Joe Gress · #4 09-17-2008, 02:39 PM

From what I have heard and have played (the Qtron+), the moog is a bit more for the DnB type sound as it will dominate on the low end. If you looking for more of a funky mutron-squelchy type sound, the Qtron is better.

Ely · #5 09-17-2008, 11:55 PM

The Moog is definitely more of a synth filter, while the Q-Tron is more of a funk filter.

**TheMutt** · #6 09-18-2008, 12:00 AM

The Moog is definitely more versatile, but don't forget that there's also a QTron+ with which you could add a fuzz pedal into the loop so as not to mess up the envelope of the filter, but keep the fuzziness.