|  | | 
01-01-2008, 10:41 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: UK | | | Preamp DI pedals to FOH
Sign in to disble this ad
Many of us own a preamp DI pedal such as the Sansamp or MXR M-80 etc but what is best sent to front of house. The idea of these pedals is to shape the tone but I also read that the DI signal should be pre EQ. Should we just trust the soundman with the FOH sound, and anly EQ it ourselves when we need to?
Are these pedals more of a recording tool? | 
01-01-2008, 12:57 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA | | | Hi Low one -
I use a sansamp pedal and I like the fact that I can EQ for the room and give the soundman something that I think sounds decent. I usually want a certain amount of overdrive and sustain that I'm not always sure I'd get from most soundguys...I guess you can still give the soundguy a pre EQ send, but then you're kinda at his mercy, ya know?
Yes, I use it for recording too - very nice! | 
01-01-2008, 01:22 PM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | | There are loads of threads on this subject in the Amps forum, although I'm not sure what search terms would work. While naturally there are a range of opinions and approaches, I think the majority of situations call for pre-EQ DI simply because what sounds good on stage, in front of your own amp/cab, does not always sound good through the PA speakers. So I would send tone-shaping qualities such as a tube gain stage or an effect pedal into the DI path, but I would leave any EQ'ing of the PA speakers to the guy handling the PA. | 
01-01-2008, 01:53 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Austin, TX | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bongomania There are loads of threads on this subject in the Amps forum, although I'm not sure what search terms would work. While naturally there are a range of opinions and approaches, I think the majority of situations call for pre-EQ DI simply because what sounds good on stage, in front of your own amp/cab, does not always sound good through the PA speakers. So I would send tone-shaping qualities such as a tube gain stage or an effect pedal into the DI path, but I would leave any EQ'ing of the PA speakers to the guy handling the PA. | Yup, which is why I normally tell people to put their Sansamp at the end of the chain if you plan on using it as a DI. If you are running into a house PA, your amp just became a big monitor.
__________________
It was a message from God. The curse has been lifted, and you are now free to buy a better pedal. - Bongomania
| 
01-01-2008, 02:16 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Athens, Greece | | | I was about to order the M-80 but I just may be able to get the EBS Microbass 2...
Anyway, the plan is to send a signal to the house from the pedal, which will be plugged into the amps fx loop. Should I use the EQ and gain/overdrive on the pedal (as well as the tube and speaker simulation in the case of the EBS), or try to keep things as transparent as possible?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bassteban Strings on; pants off | | 
01-01-2008, 03:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Northern VA | | | meh, a lot of bands have gotten great sounds by putting a mic in front of a great rock amp, which is exactly what the SABDDI is going for. The idea that we have to send a pure signal to the PA is a pretty modern one I think. | 
01-01-2008, 05:49 PM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikoubis Ithe plan is to send a signal to the house from the pedal, which will be plugged into the amps fx loop. Should I use the EQ and gain/overdrive on the pedal (as well as the tube and speaker simulation in the case of the EBS), or try to keep things as transparent as possible? | Why would you put the EBS in the amp's fx loop? I'm not sure it will work well there. | 
01-02-2008, 01:44 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: UK | | | Am I right in thinking there are 2 types of preamp to talk about? Firstly the emulator like the Sansamp etc which should be on as it’s meant to create an ‘amp like’ tone, and then there’s the EQ/DI like the MXR M-80 etc where an EQ tweak can be made if needed but the DI path will be generally pre EQ. | 
01-02-2008, 02:03 AM
| | <- Not me I just like looking at her | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cable Wi | | | Ideally you would like to send two maybe three signals to the PA. A clean and effected DI and a mic if you're about that. Which is most important depends on you and your soundguy getting together and deciding whats going to work. If it's a different soundguy every night then its probably a different opinion every night. | 
01-02-2008, 02:31 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vienna, Austria | | I was gigging a lot previous year and talked to a lot of engineers because of this problem or the simple question: what needs to be sent to the PA?
The answer is simple: a good bass signal  which technically means:
you shouldn't have too much mud on the 250 Hz because this is the first frequency the engineer would turn down if it sounds too muddy.
you shouldn't have too much on 60Hz because this will kill the bassdrum's pump potential.
the focus should be on 80 Hz, right amount of 250 Hz Lowmids, clarity at 1 kHz, treble for slapping 2.5-3 kHz. Anything above 3 kHz is not of use in a live situation.
the really low end part 30-50 Hz is good if it's there, but this mostly muds up the sound and sucks up dynamics.
back to the story:
you should focus on having a clean, compact signal. this is most easily and best done by a tube preamp. I really like the Ampeg SVTDI because it gives some compression and pre-shapes the sound in a humble way. it removes a bit of the nosey mids and the hiss above 5 kHz. it's as good for energetic rock as it is for jazz. I really like it, but I don't have it  .
the t.c.electronics goldchannel is also very good in this application but is heftier on the purse, but also more professional and will stay in your rack forever, no matter if you need a mic or instrument preamp.
__________________
Spector NS4CR, EADG, jazz ----- Ibanez BTB205, AEADG, electro
Peavey Zodiac DE, EADG, funk ----- Peavey Cirrus AC BXP, HEAD, boredom-issues
| 
01-02-2008, 03:08 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: UK | | Quote:
Originally Posted by murph.vienna I was gigging a lot previous year and talked to a lot of engineers because of this problem or the simple question: what needs to be sent to the PA?
The answer is simple: a good bass signal  which technically means:
you shouldn't have too much mud on the 250 Hz because this is the first frequency the engineer would turn down if it sounds too muddy.
you shouldn't have too much on 60Hz because this will kill the bassdrum's pump potential.
the focus should be on 80 Hz, right amount of 250 Hz Lowmids, clarity at 1 kHz, treble for slapping 2.5-3 kHz. Anything above 3 kHz is not of use in a live situation.
the really low end part 30-50 Hz is good if it's there, but this mostly muds up the sound and sucks up dynamics.
back to the story:
you should focus on having a clean, compact signal. this is most easily and best done by a tube preamp. I really like the Ampeg SVTDI because it gives some compression and pre-shapes the sound in a humble way. it removes a bit of the nosey mids and the hiss above 5 kHz. it's as good for energetic rock as it is for jazz. I really like it, but I don't have it  .
the t.c.electronics goldchannel is also very good in this application but is heftier on the purse, but also more professional and will stay in your rack forever, no matter if you need a mic or instrument preamp. | That's a really useful post, thanks.
I use the MXR M-80 and I read the EQ are set to:
Bass +-18 dB @ 60 Hz, shelving
Mid +-10 dB @ 850 Hz
Treble +-12 dB @ 4 Hz, shelving
So, looking at your post the bass should be used sparingly, as should the treble. As the 'color' boosts lows and cuts mids that won't help either. | 
01-02-2008, 03:13 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Athens, Greece | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bongomania Why would you put the EBS in the amp's fx loop? I'm not sure it will work well there. | To use the pedal as a preamp, bypassing the amp's EQ and using it just as a monitor. EBS actually suggests using the Microbass along with their powered cabs. Note that the MXR is still the leading cndidate though.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bassteban Strings on; pants off | | 
01-02-2008, 03:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Athens, Greece | | Quote:
Originally Posted by the low one That's a really useful post, thanks.
I use the MXR M-80 and I read the EQ are set to:
Bass +-18 dB @ 60 Hz, shelving
Mid +-10 dB @ 850 Hz
Treble +-12 dB @ 4 Hz, shelving
So, looking at your post the bass should be used sparingly, as should the treble. As the 'color' boosts lows and cuts mids that won't help either. | Throwing the 10 band EQ in the chain should resolve any such issues... 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bassteban Strings on; pants off | | 
01-02-2008, 03:51 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Czech | | | My suggestion would be to arrange with a friend soundman or studio guy that you take your bass with your effects (DI/preamp being the last part of the fx chain), plug it directly to the mix console and find your settings on preamp, bass and fx that you and the sound guy are happy with (with with eq on the mixing board set flat).
Then, on your next gigs, stick to those settings, send post eq signal from preamp/DI to FOH and use your amp eq to shape your sound for stage acoustics.
This way you will have in FOH the sound you want, and free hand to set any sound on our rig as is necessary for stage. | 
01-02-2008, 04:09 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vienna, Austria | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikoubis Throwing the 10 band EQ in the chain should resolve any such issues...  | +6 dB with q=3 [31 band eq] 180° phase change
+6 dB with q=1.5 [16 band eq] = 90°
+6 dB with q=0.8 [8 band EQ] = 45° phase change
__________________
Spector NS4CR, EADG, jazz ----- Ibanez BTB205, AEADG, electro
Peavey Zodiac DE, EADG, funk ----- Peavey Cirrus AC BXP, HEAD, boredom-issues
| 
01-02-2008, 06:58 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Athens, Greece | | Quote:
Originally Posted by murph.vienna +6 dB with q=3 [31 band eq] 180° phase change
+6 dB with q=1.5 [16 band eq] = 90°
+6 dB with q=0.8 [8 band EQ] = 45° phase change | Pwned I guess, but isn't +6 dB a bit radical? I always go easy on graphic EQ's live, mainly to cut annoying/unusable frequencies. Boosting the hell out of a single freq on a graphic EQ always seemed stupid to me and now I know why, I suppose.
Meanwhile, back on topic...
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bassteban Strings on; pants off | | 
01-02-2008, 07:09 AM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikoubis To use the (EBS) pedal as a preamp, bypassing the amp's EQ and using it just as a monitor. | Ah, OK, so you would be going:
bass --> EBS --> loop return jack
~ not~
bass --> amp in --> loop send --> EBS --> loop return
right?
That makes much more sense. | 
01-02-2008, 07:26 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Athens, Greece | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bongomania bass --> EBS --> loop return jack | That's the one. That way I'll be able to more or less hear what I'm DI'ing to the house right?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bassteban Strings on; pants off | | 
01-02-2008, 08:36 AM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | | It works in most (maybe not all) cases. | 
01-02-2008, 09:05 AM
|  | Registered User Endorsing Artist: Spector Basses/Genz Benz Amplification/Mojo Hand FX | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Dallas, TX | | Quote:
Originally Posted by BetterBottomEnd Ideally you would like to send two maybe three signals to the PA. A clean and effected DI and a mic if you're about that. Which is most important depends on you and your soundguy getting together and deciding whats going to work. If it's a different soundguy every night then its probably a different opinion every night. |
I agree with you, that this would be the "ideal" setup...but chances are most of us don't gig with large enough systems to allow the bass player 3 channels (depending on the # of channels required from the band and what is available).
I usually just use a singal channel for club gigs (off of a Paranormal DI/Pre). And 2 channels for festival (or large venue) gigs...one channel through just a standard countryman DI (Bass -> DI -> FOH), and one mic'd cab (Bass -> effects -> Amp -> FOH). I usually bring an Audix D6 to mic my cab. Then I make friends with the sound guy, and hope for the best...LOL... | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |