Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Effects [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-14-2010, 07:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vermont
Cool Sansamp VT Bass Deluxe vs. Bass Driver Deluxe

Sign in to disble this ad
So, it seems I would like one of these two. Which one? Both are DI. Is the VT Deluxe just a year newer version basically. Is there different tonal schemes for each one. I have been reviewing and they both seem cool to me. From what I have gathered the VT maybe has some more modern tones that are useful.

I believe both can have 3 settings for 2 basses or 6 settings for 1 bass. Just trying to figure out the differences. I mean they are made by the same company, so they have to be different I would think.

Any help??? Thanks.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
  #2  
Old 10-14-2010, 08:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Olympia WA
VT emulates an SVT. If you want that sound that is the go to pedal.
I use the bass driver because I like that particular sound combined with my GK head.
Get both...
  #3  
Old 10-14-2010, 09:00 PM
behndy's Avatar
yiffffffTASTIC
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Supporting Member
they are pretty different actually. they took the VT Bass pedal and jammed it's characteristics into the same box with the same options as the Bass Driver Deluxe.

sounds a lot different.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric! View Post
I'M A WARLOCK.
My YouTube (Pedal Demos)

Pedal FS/FT Thread

Motu 828 mkII FW, Digi003 Rack FS/FT
  #4  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:27 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vermont
Isn't the VT lacking an XLR or something that the bass driver has. Now that I know VT is Ampeggy in degrees and the other one is "who knows what....just an adjustable noise maker that people dig" the after question would be what plugs or features are missing on the VT that the Bass driver has.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
  #5  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Except for the blend control which is absent in the VT, both deluxe versions have the same basic features, including XLR. As mentioned above, the VT was designed to emulate Ampeg sounds, so it has a somewhat different tone. The relevant info on the differences in features is on the Tech 21 website.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
  #6  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by subopposite View Post
Isn't the VT lacking an XLR or something that the bass driver has. Now that I know VT is Ampeggy in degrees and the other one is "who knows what....just an adjustable noise maker that people dig" the after question would be what plugs or features are missing on the VT that the Bass driver has.
VT has mid control
  #7  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vermont
that's right JPtron,

i do remember reading reviews about the original bass driver and the only bad comments were the mids.

thanks all.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
  #8  
Old 10-15-2010, 01:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
I have been using both (not at the same time) as a pre amp into a Crown XLS 1500 power amp thru one or two goliath 4x10 cabs.

The VT is an Ampeg simulator. It seams to always have a warm "wooly" roundish kinda sound to it. (Like a tennis ball) I have been using it at rehearsals playing with settings trying to find the right sound for the right song(Cover Band). I think I'm ready to gig with it and tonight will be the night!

The BDDI Deluxe is a different animal. to me its an edgy tight modern sound, (like a block of machined steel) a little too mid scooped for most of the songs we play.

I wish I could get a little of both in programable pedal!
__________________
Mike


http://www.facebook.com/pages/Safe-f...555132?ref=sgm
Mediocre Bassist Club member #199
  #9  
Old 10-15-2010, 01:29 PM
G.Bisson's Avatar
Guardian of Grey
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Supporting Member
thats a good way to generalize the two.

VT = old school, with more mids

BDDI = modern, with more lows
__________________
glug glug glug glug: rattle yer brain!
  #10  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:19 AM
Registered User

Manufacturer: Tech 21
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Our VT Bass Deluxe has a fuller midrange sound and is capable of producing a more aggressive overdriven sound. The Bass Driver Deluxe has a more scooped midrange and has more of a vintage type of tone.
  #11  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Ohio
So the Bass Driver is better for vintage tones? I was under the impression that it was the other way around for whatever reason. If thats true I guess I won't be selling my BDDI for the VT.
  #12  
Old 10-19-2010, 11:47 AM
Registered User

Manufacturer: Tech 21
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
No sorry I meant the opposite. The VT Bass has the more vintage type of tone. Of course sound is very subjective and to some a vintage bass tone would be the old 60's Motown sound while others might consider early Rush or Van Halen vintage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr8kdWpB3U4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Tnd1vjtkIk
  #13  
Old 10-19-2010, 01:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vermont
From all the you tubes that i have heard, i like the VT a lot better or seems it has more usable sounds that I am interested in.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
  #14  
Old 10-19-2010, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Townsville, Australia
I was in the unenviable position of blowing one of my christmas bonuses on the bddi deluxe, only to have the VT deluxe show it's face a few months later!!!!
I honestly would have prefered the VT but am stuck with the driver. Having said that, the BDDI is still a cool peice of kit. And it is a touchy and not so intuitive little bugger. About once a year I've dialed in something that looks like it should be wrong, but sounds so right!
I honestly (enventually) found the factory presets a great starting point to tweak from.
  #15  
Old 10-20-2010, 07:48 AM
G.Bisson's Avatar
Guardian of Grey
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowdownstu View Post
And it is a touchy and not so intuitive little bugger. About once a year I've dialed in something that looks like it should be wrong, but sounds so right!
I'm still finding new sounds hidden in this black box too. There are some unique tones lurking in the shadows of the bass knob. Turn 'bass' back around 10o'clock with 'drive' past noon and 'volume' cranked. The 'Bassman Style' shown in the manual is a close starting point, then turn 'bass' down, 'treb' down even more, and 'gain' up.
__________________
glug glug glug glug: rattle yer brain!
  #16  
Old 10-20-2010, 08:44 AM
Registered User

Manufacturer: Tech 21
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Because the tone controls on our SansAmp products are active small tweaks in tone go a long way. Plus the controls are interactive. For instance with the Bass Driver DI which has a midrange scoop you can also boost the midrange by lowering the bass and treble controls. The main thing to remember with active controls is that they will boost or lower the overall volume as well so you need to keep that in mind when trying to alter your tone.
  #17  
Old 10-20-2010, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Has anyone done a frequency response on the BDDI like has been done for the VT as seen in this thread?

VT Bass frequency response plots
  #18  
Old 11-22-2010, 04:55 PM
BluesMan845's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Suffern, NY USA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech21nyc View Post
Because the tone controls on our SansAmp products are active small tweaks in tone go a long way. Plus the controls are interactive. For instance with the Bass Driver DI which has a midrange scoop you can also boost the midrange by lowering the bass and treble controls. The main thing to remember with active controls is that they will boost or lower the overall volume as well so you need to keep that in mind when trying to alter your tone.
I am curious what type of bass you developed your presets ( in the manual ) for.. Would you consider an active, modern bass closest to what you used or would a passive fender style bass be closer to what you used?

I am asking because I have a Carvin LB70 which is active and a crappy danelectro longhorn reissue which is definitely passive. The presets sound better on the Danelectro and I find most of the presets on the Carvin are too overdriven leading me to think you developed your presets on a passive style bass.
__________________
Carvin LB70 4 string - All Koa Body/Neck
Carvin BX1200
Acme Low B4
A Tuner
iRig/Amplitube 2 iPhone app for practicing/recording
  #19  
Old 11-22-2010, 06:14 PM
Swift713's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Berkshires, Ma
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpTron View Post
Has anyone done a frequency response on the BDDI like has been done for the VT as seen in this thread?

VT Bass frequency response plots
There was a thread like that on the BDDI frequency response a couple years ago. Maybe try searching. IIRC, the upshot seemed to be that there was a pretty big notch at about 850hz with the bass, treble, and presence at 12:00.
__________________
http://myspace.com/tfiws
  #20  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:21 AM
Registered User

Manufacturer: Tech 21
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluesMan845 View Post
I am curious what type of bass you developed your presets ( in the manual ) for.. Would you consider an active, modern bass closest to what you used or would a passive fender style bass be closer to what you used?

I am asking because I have a Carvin LB70 which is active and a crappy danelectro longhorn reissue which is definitely passive. The presets sound better on the Danelectro and I find most of the presets on the Carvin are too overdriven leading me to think you developed your presets on a passive style bass.
I went through the same thing last night with my bass and our Leeds pedal. The suggested settings are really just that, suggested. The basses we have here are a 70's P Bass and J Bass. Of course your playing style, (hard or soft, with or without pick) and your bass will ultimately dictate the final outcome. It's best to think of the suggested settings as starting points and take it from there. Too much gain, turn it down, not enough low end, turn up the bass etc. Our pedals are designed to sound and "react" like a tube amp.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.