|  | | 
10-14-2010, 07:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Vermont | | Sansamp VT Bass Deluxe vs. Bass Driver Deluxe
Sign in to disble this ad
So, it seems I would like one of these two. Which one? Both are DI. Is the VT Deluxe just a year newer version basically. Is there different tonal schemes for each one. I have been reviewing and they both seem cool to me. From what I have gathered the VT maybe has some more modern tones that are useful.
I believe both can have 3 settings for 2 basses or 6 settings for 1 bass. Just trying to figure out the differences. I mean they are made by the same company, so they have to be different I would think.
Any help??? Thanks.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
| 
10-14-2010, 08:54 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Olympia WA | | VT emulates an SVT. If you want that sound that is the go to pedal.
I use the bass driver because I like that particular sound combined with my GK head.
Get both...  | 
10-14-2010, 09:00 PM
|  | yiffffffTASTIC | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: California | | | they are pretty different actually. they took the VT Bass pedal and jammed it's characteristics into the same box with the same options as the Bass Driver Deluxe.
sounds a lot different. | 
10-15-2010, 09:27 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Vermont | | | Isn't the VT lacking an XLR or something that the bass driver has. Now that I know VT is Ampeggy in degrees and the other one is "who knows what....just an adjustable noise maker that people dig" the after question would be what plugs or features are missing on the VT that the Bass driver has.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
| 
10-15-2010, 09:32 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Saskatoon, Canada | | | Except for the blend control which is absent in the VT, both deluxe versions have the same basic features, including XLR. As mentioned above, the VT was designed to emulate Ampeg sounds, so it has a somewhat different tone. The relevant info on the differences in features is on the Tech 21 website.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
| 
10-15-2010, 09:37 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NJ | | Quote:
Originally Posted by subopposite Isn't the VT lacking an XLR or something that the bass driver has. Now that I know VT is Ampeggy in degrees and the other one is "who knows what....just an adjustable noise maker that people dig" the after question would be what plugs or features are missing on the VT that the Bass driver has. | VT has mid control | 
10-15-2010, 09:43 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Vermont | | | that's right JPtron,
i do remember reading reviews about the original bass driver and the only bad comments were the mids.
thanks all.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
| 
10-15-2010, 01:19 PM
| | | | I have been using both (not at the same time) as a pre amp into a Crown XLS 1500 power amp thru one or two goliath 4x10 cabs.
The VT is an Ampeg simulator. It seams to always have a warm "wooly" roundish kinda sound to it. (Like a tennis ball) I have been using it at rehearsals playing with settings trying to find the right sound for the right song(Cover Band). I think I'm ready to gig with it and tonight will be the night!
The BDDI Deluxe is a different animal. to me its an edgy tight modern sound, (like a block of machined steel) a little too mid scooped for most of the songs we play.
I wish I could get a little of both in programable pedal! | 
10-15-2010, 01:29 PM
|  | Guardian of Grey | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Virginia | | | thats a good way to generalize the two.
VT = old school, with more mids
BDDI = modern, with more lows
__________________ glug glug glug glug: rattle yer brain! | 
10-19-2010, 11:19 AM
| | Registered User Manufacturer: Tech 21 | | | | | Our VT Bass Deluxe has a fuller midrange sound and is capable of producing a more aggressive overdriven sound. The Bass Driver Deluxe has a more scooped midrange and has more of a vintage type of tone. | 
10-19-2010, 11:25 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Windham, Ohio | | | So the Bass Driver is better for vintage tones? I was under the impression that it was the other way around for whatever reason. If thats true I guess I won't be selling my BDDI for the VT. | 
10-19-2010, 01:28 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Vermont | | | From all the you tubes that i have heard, i like the VT a lot better or seems it has more usable sounds that I am interested in.
__________________
The best is yet to come...I hope! Fender Jag #
Markbass 800 Tube #237 Avatar Neo 4x10 #228
| 
10-19-2010, 05:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Townsville, Australia | | | I was in the unenviable position of blowing one of my christmas bonuses on the bddi deluxe, only to have the VT deluxe show it's face a few months later!!!!
I honestly would have prefered the VT but am stuck with the driver. Having said that, the BDDI is still a cool peice of kit. And it is a touchy and not so intuitive little bugger. About once a year I've dialed in something that looks like it should be wrong, but sounds so right!
I honestly (enventually) found the factory presets a great starting point to tweak from. | 
10-20-2010, 07:48 AM
|  | Guardian of Grey | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Virginia | | Quote:
Originally Posted by lowdownstu And it is a touchy and not so intuitive little bugger. About once a year I've dialed in something that looks like it should be wrong, but sounds so right! | I'm still finding new sounds hidden in this black box too. There are some unique tones lurking in the shadows of the bass knob. Turn 'bass' back around 10o'clock with 'drive' past noon and 'volume' cranked. The 'Bassman Style' shown in the manual is a close starting point, then turn 'bass' down, 'treb' down even more, and 'gain' up.
__________________ glug glug glug glug: rattle yer brain! | 
10-20-2010, 08:44 AM
| | Registered User Manufacturer: Tech 21 | | | | | Because the tone controls on our SansAmp products are active small tweaks in tone go a long way. Plus the controls are interactive. For instance with the Bass Driver DI which has a midrange scoop you can also boost the midrange by lowering the bass and treble controls. The main thing to remember with active controls is that they will boost or lower the overall volume as well so you need to keep that in mind when trying to alter your tone. | 
10-20-2010, 08:56 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NJ | | Has anyone done a frequency response on the BDDI like has been done for the VT as seen in this thread? VT Bass frequency response plots | 
11-22-2010, 04:55 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Suffern, NY USA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tech21nyc Because the tone controls on our SansAmp products are active small tweaks in tone go a long way. Plus the controls are interactive. For instance with the Bass Driver DI which has a midrange scoop you can also boost the midrange by lowering the bass and treble controls. The main thing to remember with active controls is that they will boost or lower the overall volume as well so you need to keep that in mind when trying to alter your tone. | I am curious what type of bass you developed your presets ( in the manual ) for.. Would you consider an active, modern bass closest to what you used or would a passive fender style bass be closer to what you used?
I am asking because I have a Carvin LB70 which is active and a crappy danelectro longhorn reissue which is definitely passive. The presets sound better on the Danelectro and I find most of the presets on the Carvin are too overdriven leading me to think you developed your presets on a passive style bass.
__________________
Carvin LB70 4 string - All Koa Body/Neck
Carvin BX1200   Acme Low B4  
A Tuner
iRig/Amplitube 2 iPhone app for practicing/recording
| 
11-22-2010, 06:14 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: The Berkshires, Ma | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jpTron | There was a thread like that on the BDDI frequency response a couple years ago. Maybe try searching. IIRC, the upshot seemed to be that there was a pretty big notch at about 850hz with the bass, treble, and presence at 12:00. | 
11-23-2010, 08:21 AM
| | Registered User Manufacturer: Tech 21 | | | | Quote:
Originally Posted by BluesMan845 I am curious what type of bass you developed your presets ( in the manual ) for.. Would you consider an active, modern bass closest to what you used or would a passive fender style bass be closer to what you used?
I am asking because I have a Carvin LB70 which is active and a crappy danelectro longhorn reissue which is definitely passive. The presets sound better on the Danelectro and I find most of the presets on the Carvin are too overdriven leading me to think you developed your presets on a passive style bass. | I went through the same thing last night with my bass and our Leeds pedal. The suggested settings are really just that, suggested. The basses we have here are a 70's P Bass and J Bass. Of course your playing style, (hard or soft, with or without pick) and your bass will ultimately dictate the final outcome. It's best to think of the suggested settings as starting points and take it from there. Too much gain, turn it down, not enough low end, turn up the bass etc. Our pedals are designed to sound and "react" like a tube amp. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |