|  | 
06-28-2010, 10:32 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Mexico City | | | Supercollider vz ToneBender
Sign in to disble this ad
Hi, I want to hear your opinions about Earthbound Audio Effects Supercollider vs Sola Sound ColorSound ToneBender. wich one do you prefere?
vs
Lets the match begin. | 
06-28-2010, 10:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: America's High-Five | | | I've never tried a Tonebender, but I LOVE my Supercollider!!
__________________
"Are you getting the 'Pinkie?'" - Tigerbass
"i'm a pretty, beaver hat-wearing, mother ******. RARRRRR" - behndy
| 
06-28-2010, 11:49 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: America's High-Five | | Bassfuzz.com is also an indispensable resource, run by our very own grygrx. He's got I think hundreds of demos, including one of the Supercollider (see here). Not sure if he has any Tonebender clones demo'd, but hopefully he'll chime in sometime soon (he's a mod, it's likely he'll see it  ).
His review sold me on a Supercollider, and I've put it up against quite a few dirt pedals over the past few months and it's still king to me.
__________________
"Are you getting the 'Pinkie?'" - Tigerbass
"i'm a pretty, beaver hat-wearing, mother ******. RARRRRR" - behndy
| 
06-28-2010, 11:53 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Mexico City | | Quote:
Originally Posted by FreaqyFrequency | Already knew, but I appreciate your help. I just wanted to know opinions, to satisfy my FUZZ Adiction next purchase as well as you mentioned I'm barely half the road, much remains to be done. | 
06-28-2010, 11:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Mexico City | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebennetts Bassfuzz.com is also an indispensable resource, run by our very own grygrx. He's got I think hundreds of demos, including one of the Supercollider (see here). Not sure if he has any Tonebender clones demo'd, but hopefully he'll chime in sometime soon (he's a mod, it's likely he'll see it  ).
His review sold me on a Supercollider, and I've put it up against quite a few dirt pedals over the past few months and it's still king to me. | Yes excellent Fuzz addict, I all ready fell in to is spider web with the Love Tentacle. And no, he doesn't have a Tonebender review. I also hope he can have one of those. | 
06-29-2010, 12:29 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: London, England | | | The sfx Micro Fuzz is based on the Colorsound Bass Fuzz which is a Tonebender tweaked for bass (sorry, I've not tried an actual Tonebender). It has waaaaaay more low end than any other fuzz I have ever tried (which is a lot). It is pretty scooped sounding though. The Supercollider is awesome, plenty of lows as long as your bass isn't too hot. it has lots of midrange snarl when you dig in. I've settled on the Supercollider, Micro Fuzz and Bass Big Muff on my board for now! | 
06-30-2010, 06:47 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Mexico City | | | Any more opinions? | 
06-30-2010, 06:56 AM
|  | God of Thunder...retired. | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Columbus, Ohio | | | Sure.
I have owned two Tonebender clones...a mark II and a mark III. I have owned over 15 different Muffs.
The low end doesn't seem to have as much staying power in a band setting for the Tonebenders as the Sovtek Muffs, and their variants (which is basically what a SC is, with some bells and whistles).
So, go with the muff. I have an original CW SBM and a Supercollider on my board...and no Tonebenders (Bit I don't play in bands anymore as a full disclosure). | 
06-30-2010, 07:22 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Wakefield, UK | | | Muffs and Tonebenders are completely different sounds and each will work well in specific situations.
There's less variation between muff types than their is with tonebenders. A MkIII tonebender is the closest you'll get to a muff with a tonebender. A Mk1 is as far away as you can get, very sputtery and gated. The coloursound bass fuzz doesn't have much of the tonebender character in my opinion.
It all depends on the sounds you're looking for. Out of all the tonebender variations, I'd say the Mk1 sits best in a band mix. Certain muff types can sit great in a band setting, especially when there's a kick in the mids to help you cut through (as opposed to the scooped mids).
In conclusion though, I don't think you can really compare the 2, they're VERY different. You can't go wrong with either of them, though.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by kevteop For all we know, there could be an army of beautiful virgins wandering door-to-door with photos of me, in a desperate attempt to mate me to death. | | 
06-30-2010, 11:24 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Vista, CA | | | I prefer Big Muffs over Tonebenders. Much more character in the Big Muff. | 
06-30-2010, 11:37 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | | most tonebender circuits aren't very good at retaining low end, and they don't offer much variety of tone. if you like the character of their distortion, then there you go, you're set with an on/off type of pedal.
Of the two, I'd go with the supercollider - big time. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |