![]() |
Adding a pickup, any one have a Dual P? I am looking at adding a bridge pickup to my Pbass and instead of going with the obvious PJ, i an thinking of adding a second P pickup in the bridge position. Anyone ever do this and how does it compare to/differ from the traditional J in the bridge position? |
Check out a Blacktop Jazz. I had one for a while and it was awesome. I regret selling it, but at the time I had no choice. |
The dual-P is funky as all heck: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABLwmYI09Lw Also, Fender offers it in the Blacktop Jazz: http://www.fender.com/series/blackto...top-jazz-bass/ |
Quote:
|
I have a Fender Blacktop Jazz which is a Jazz body and neck with 2 P pups. Heres a soundclip of one (not me but same bass, everything on full). Bo***cksy springs to mind! https://www.box.com/s/0giiip2y1612vfjh9dix |
I have a Hohner B2A, which has dual EMG P-pickups in humbucker casings. Brilliant sound. |
I wonder why Fender never reissued their Elite II line or offer the dual P in any of their American models? Essentially what i am looking for is an all passive Elite II |
I modded my first bass (Yamaha RBX200) many years ago by adding a second P pickup at the bridge. The Tetris-block shape poses problems at the bridge. If mounted in the traditional orientation, the E and A strings have a much thinner tone than the D and G. (EDIT: Got that backwards... the D and G are thin, because they're right up by the bridge saddles...) If I were to do it again, I would reverse the orientation. Even then, it's suboptimal IMHO. Something like a Model J or a Big Split would be better, I think. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s) Quote:
I had 2 Elite II's. Even though they were part Fender's re-emergence of high quality control instruments I don't feel they were a stellar example of dual-P design. They had passive pickups and an active preamp that was problematic tonewise. You could coax some decent tone out of it but I found it voiced extremely bright. Ultimately that (and, for me, the huge neck) made them expendable. I have 2 vintage BC Rich's (and I'm not in a metal band) that provide much more effective use of the dual P's. A '77 Eagle with early placement near the neck, and an '80 Mock with a reverse P arrangement. I like them alot - but, lots of tone options in their electronics. I never run them fully passive. I prefer the reverse P setup, even in standard position i.e. Spector, Warwick |
The ideal would be a JP bass ... :smug: The P PU normally is stronger than the J PU. So it better for the bridge position with so smaller amplitude of the strings ... It is also better because a SC is "more direct" compared to a HB. The nearer the PU gets to the neck, the greater is the danger to sound muddy and indifferent. So, the direct SC is better to compensate the indifferent neck sound ... On the other side, the SC may sound too harsh at the bridge while a HB makes the tone "rounder" ... But it always is a package of wood, PUs, hardware and strings. |
I would love to hear a bridge P soloed before actually pulling out the router. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s) The Elite II was one of the best Basses I've ever owned (I had the Blue) :cool: |
Almost all of the old Leland Sklar recordings are with his dual-P bass. Check out any James Taylor recording before the 80's. Amazing tone (and playing of course). |
Quote:
![]() And love the sound, the feel and the looks. :) |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.