|  | 
03-19-2010, 05:57 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Adelaide, Australia | | | Do active and passive PICKUPS have a difference in sound?
Sign in to disble this ad
Hi, is there a sound difference between active and passive pickups. Not like just an active pre-amp as on most basses, but active pickups as well. I know the difference between an active pre-amp, and no pre-amp. Thanks
__________________
Christian Praise and Worship Bassists #694
Lakland, MTD, Ashdown
| 
03-19-2010, 06:09 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Eastern Wisconsin | | | Yes.
__________________
Lefty Union #203, SX Club Member Quote: |
Originally Posted by SurferJoe46 Bass tone isn't rocket surgery anyway. | | 
03-19-2010, 06:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Adelaide, Australia | | | Examples? I know there is a volume difference, but what about tone?
__________________
Christian Praise and Worship Bassists #694
Lakland, MTD, Ashdown
| 
03-19-2010, 06:36 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Timisoara, Romania | | | the actives ones have a bigger sound spectrum due to the preamp doing it's job..it's hard to describe but think if you record a passive bass and a active one the active one will have much more stuff recorded (hope you get it)
read an article one by adam nitti (i think it was him) saying that he prefers passive basses in the studio for that matter and actives are good on stage
__________________
No Sig
| 
03-19-2010, 06:38 AM
| | | | Pickups cant be active. Those active pickups are just passive pickups with a preamp built into them. They are often low output which is why they have the preamp built into them (this boosts the output to a normal or higher level). | 
03-19-2010, 06:45 AM
|  | quid verum atque decens Builder: Rickett Customs | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Southern Maryland | | | The preamp buffers the signal to maximize full frequency response and to avoid distortion due to clipping. Advantages of active pickups are that they can be louder than a similar grade passive pickup, allow more "headroom" and dynamic range. Active pickups also produce less noise and hum.
.....And as always, alot of people will say that the drawback is the use of a battery, although they don't tend to have a helluva lot of draw.
Last edited by Rickett Customs : 03-19-2010 at 06:48 AM.
| 
03-19-2010, 07:25 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickett Customs allow more "headroom" and dynamic range. | 
How are you able to get more headroom from a pickup with a transistor in it, versus no additional components at all?
Passive pickups should have higher headroom, because there is no gain stage to limit them, unless you are running them through a preamp. | 
03-19-2010, 08:02 AM
|  | quid verum atque decens Builder: Rickett Customs | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Southern Maryland | | Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man 
How are you able to get more headroom from a pickup with a transistor in it, versus no additional components at all? | You may have me wrong here Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man Passive pickups should have higher headroom, because there is no gain stage to limit them, unless you are running them through a preamp. | Ultimately, everything runs through a preamp right? Whether it be onboard, outboard or into the amp. This is the example of active/passive inputs on a preamp/(head) right?
Last edited by Rickett Customs : 03-19-2010 at 08:08 AM.
| 
03-19-2010, 08:06 AM
| | | | The main difference is that the preamp has a buffer which prevents loading of the pickup which in turn prevents loss of high end and gives a more full range signal. The other advantage is having a preamp on the bass which can be handy (and some preamps have a preset eq curve which gives it a different sound). | 
03-19-2010, 08:11 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickett Customs You may have me wrong here
Ultimately, everything runs through a preamp right? Whether it be onboard, outboard or into the amp. This is the example of active/passive inputs on a preamp/(head) right? | Yep, you have to run through a preamp eventually, so when you run through multiple preamps, you start losing headroom.
You could almost think of it like making photocopies of photocopies. Each gain stage degrades the signal a bit, so it's best to have as few as possible. | 
03-19-2010, 08:13 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootzilla The main difference is that the preamp has a buffer which prevents loading of the pickup which in turn prevents loss of high end and gives a more full range signal. The other advantage is having a preamp on the bass which can be handy (and some preamps have a preset eq curve which gives it a different sound). | Both active pickups and preamps do that.
The low impedance output is one of the main advantages to wanting an active setup. | 
03-19-2010, 08:14 AM
|  | quid verum atque decens Builder: Rickett Customs | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Southern Maryland | | Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man Yep, you have to run through a preamp eventually, so when you run through multiple preamps, you start losing headroom.
You could almost think of it like making photocopies of photocopies. Each gain stage degrades the signal a bit, so it's best to have as few as possible. | I with you on that. 10-4 | 
03-19-2010, 08:19 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Illinois, USA | | | It depends entirely upon the design of the pickup. Now, "active pickup" while inaccurate for the reason Bootzilla posts, is the accepted term for pickups which have the pre-amp in the PUP housing so I think we can dispense with that red herring.
It's entirely possible that someone could design an active PUP that sounds just like a particular passive PUP design. That's the concept behind EMG's vintage sound PUPs. See, the thing with an active PUP is you can design the PUP to give you a sound without regard to output levels, and use the preamp to give you the level you want. So it's kinda pointless to speculate on what IS the difference between active sounds and passive sound.
It's a difference in PUP design. Same as the difference between a DiMarzio Model P, a Duncan 1/4 Pounder, and a Fender '62 P PUP. It's all in how they designed the PUP.
And, higher output is NOT a common feature of active designs (either PUPs or circuits). I've played active basses of various types since early 1979 (StingRays, Lakland/Bart, Duncan, EMG) and none of them have been louder than my passive Fenders, and in fact have less output than early G&L L-1000s.
John
__________________
JTE Spelling, grammar, and punctuation do matter, despite the threats of death by grease fire!
"Without space, music is just noise piling up on itself." TRK
Lakland Owners' Club # 248
| 
03-19-2010, 08:20 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: League City, Tx | | | Some active pups (depending on design) can have a slighty wider frequency range simply because they use less windings and rely on a boost from the internal preamp to get to the levels they need. Less windings mean less indcutive reactance which varies with frequency. Same theory applies to single coils vs. humbuckers since humbuckers will typically have more total windings. More windings will give you more output but a narrower frequency range, all other things being equal.
__________________
Lefty Union Member #26 G&L Club Member #2, Rickenbacker Club #4 Acoustic Club #2 Jag Club Member #2 T-40 club #15 Medium Bass Club #58 Korg Pandora club #2
| 
03-19-2010, 08:23 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man Both active pickups and preamps do that.
The low impedance output is one of the main advantages to wanting an active setup. | I was using the term preamp to refer to both the internal preamp inside the active pickup and a "normal preamp" found on most active basses.
I totally agree on the low impedance output. Thats why I said that having the buffer is the main advantage as the buffer is what causes the low impedance.
Also I would not say that each gainstage degrades the audio signal.
In the hi-fi audio world where the signal has to stay as pure as possible that might be the case but here it's really not an issue.
It is true that the preamp will "degrade" or distort the signal but as long as you don't clip it you will not hear any of this distortion.
I would actually prefer to have a whole bunch of preamps in my chain to color and "distort" my signal (not the usual hi-fi preamps tho  ). | 
03-19-2010, 08:28 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootzilla Also I would not say that each gainstage degrades the audio signal.
In the hi-fi audio world where the signal has to stay as pure as possible that might be the case but here it's really not an issue.
It is true that the preamp will "degrade" or distort the signal but as long as you don't clip it you will not hear any of this distortion.
I would actually prefer to have a whole bunch of preamps in my chain to color and "distort" my signal (not the usual hi-fi preamps tho  ). | Well, maybe degrade is the wrong word.
What I should have said was just limit the headroom.
When you run the signal through multiple gain stages, you limit the amount of headroom you have available, not so much change in the tonality or anything though. | 
03-19-2010, 08:32 AM
|  | Real Basses Have 5 Strings! | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Colorado | | | I like passive pickups wired into an active preamp. I prefer the more organic sound of a passive pickup and the tone shaping of a 3 of 4 band preamp. | 
03-19-2010, 08:36 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric5 I like passive pickups wired into an active preamp. I prefer the more organic sound of a passive pickup and the tone shaping of a 3 of 4 band preamp. |
I prefer that option as well.
One of the main disadvantages to active pickups over passive pickups with a preamp is that active pickups cannot be played passive.
With passive pickups, I can choose to either play them with a preamp, or totally passive.
I have my bass set up with an active/passive switch and a passive tone control though, not all passive pickup/preamp basses will do this. | 
03-19-2010, 09:25 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: League City, Tx | | Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man I have my bass set up with an active/passive switch and a passive tone control though, not all passive pickup/preamp basses will do this. | Very few actually. Plenty let you bypass the electronics but not many include the passive tone controls with an active preamp. Jaguars and some G&LS off the top of my head.
__________________
Lefty Union Member #26 G&L Club Member #2, Rickenbacker Club #4 Acoustic Club #2 Jag Club Member #2 T-40 club #15 Medium Bass Club #58 Korg Pandora club #2
| 
03-19-2010, 09:36 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by lug Very few actually. Plenty let you bypass the electronics but not many include the passive tone controls with an active preamp. Jaguars and some G&LS off the top of my head. | Don't forget Sadowsky.
Yeah, for some reason, passive tone controls aren't too common.
I'm guessing that for most non-vintage designs, you have the kind of players that never used their tone controls to begin with.
That and the cost and simplicity factors.
It's really easy to add a passive tone though, if you like having that option. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |