|  | 
11-24-2002, 12:36 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland | | | P-J pups.. Worth it?
Sign in to disble this ad
Hi guys.
OK, it's seemingly becoming rapid that I'm not getting a G3.. so..
I think my next choice would be a MIM Pbass, but I don't know if I should get that J-pup installed or not, so this is where you guys come in...!
OK, as far as I know, the J pup eliminate's hum? Correct? What else would it do for me? I'd be using stock pickups, so what kinda of sound would I get out over the standard p-bass setup?
Thanks all  | 
11-24-2002, 12:41 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: O'Fallon MO | | | I would get one with it installed. You will have a lot more tone with it. I don't think it cancels hum though. The single P pu will give you that warm standard bass sound, but with the J it should give some added brights and mids which would help with slapping and popping and picking. Play some both ways before you buy one thats the best way to go.
__________________
All views expressed are MY OWN OPINION or the opinion of others around me. Do not be offended, and if you are please PM me.
| 
11-24-2002, 12:50 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland | | I'll need to try 'n' find one, becuase I don't the shop would be very happy if I ordered it, then didnt want it  | 
11-24-2002, 02:27 PM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Austin Texas | | | Re: P-J pups.. Worth it? Quote: Originally posted by Microbass Hi guys.
OK, as far as I know, the J pup eliminate's hum? Correct? What else would it do for me? I'd be using stock pickups, so what kinda of sound would I get out over the standard p-bass setup?
Thanks all | Hey MB,
The P-Bass is already hum-cancelling. The J-bass PU alone will add buzz (60 cycle hum) even used with the P-Bass you'll get hum from the J-bass.You can't ever get hum-cancelling from 3 coils.
I had a fender P-J bass for a couple of years. It was an OK bass, the P-Bass sound was a little fatter and less defined because it was located closer to the neck than a regular P-Bass pickup. A little too much string vibration in my opinion which led to a mushier sound. Overall it was a usuable bass but I (personally) would get alot more mileage out of a regular P or J.
Last edited by Bonafide : 11-24-2002 at 02:30 PM.
| 
11-26-2002, 01:05 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Too Close To Hell | | | You could add a noiseless J pup, like a Bill Lawrence J-45, or get a P-Bass pup with the characteristics of both (BL P-46). | 
11-26-2002, 03:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cottbus, Germany | | there are two general kinds of noiseless Js stacked and split, split is pretty much the same as a p pickup but the coils are inline
__________________
Raw data for raw nerves | 1.0594630943592952645618252949463...
Black 'n' Maple #259 | Club Sandberg #032 | Yamaha Club #195
| 
11-26-2002, 07:42 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Too Close To Hell | | | ...I have both, and neither sounds like a P. There are component, and not least circuit design differences. Same config, does not equal same voice. If it did, there would be a *very very very* small aftermarket pups industry. | 
11-27-2002, 06:42 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cottbus, Germany | |
If you are referring to my post I meant of course that split-coil J pups have a similar construction to P-Bass pickups
__________________
Raw data for raw nerves | 1.0594630943592952645618252949463...
Black 'n' Maple #259 | Club Sandberg #032 | Yamaha Club #195
| 
11-27-2002, 03:30 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Too Close To Hell | | | ...That's not even right...unless your definition of "similar" greatly differs from mine. Too many variables for successful comparisons, IMO. | 
11-28-2002, 10:10 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cottbus, Germany | | | similar construction (in this case) means to me: Both have two separate coils one for the E-A string pair and another for the D and G strings and these are reverse wound to each other as to cancel hum. The only real difference is that for the p pup the coils are in separate housings which are not in line
PS: I wasn't saying a word about similar sound
__________________
Raw data for raw nerves | 1.0594630943592952645618252949463...
Black 'n' Maple #259 | Club Sandberg #032 | Yamaha Club #195
| 
11-28-2002, 04:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: Orangevale, CA 95662 | | No. Leave the Precision as a pure P-Bass.
Unless you have a switching device that will completely isolate the J pickup, it will influence the tone from the P pickup. The Fender HotRod P is an example. Almost a P, but not quite.
Keeping your Precision as a pure bass also opens the door to acquiring another bass. It is much more fun to have a P, a J fretless, and an L-1500/Stingray, than to have one bass.
This way you can run TI Flats on the P-bass, skinny rounds on the fretless (TI Jazz Rounds) for mwah, and gnarly stainless rounds on the L1500/Stingray for grind and slap. | 
11-30-2002, 02:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: California | | | What homeboy Gavin says.
Passive P/J mixes are a difficult concept to pull off well. The output from a pair of Precision pickups (which are two pickups wired in noise-cancelling mode like a humbucker) is substantially hotter than a single Jazz pickup, so there is an inherent imbalance.
Fender's pricey and now-discontinued MIA "Hot Rodded" Precision Bass used a special set of Jazz & Precision pickups that were output-matched to overcome this somewhat, but many people do not care for the resulting Jazz sound or Precision sound. These pickups were used on no other Fender bass.
I have one of these beautiful HRPBs, which I enjoy for its other features, irrespective of the P/J pickups. I find that the Precision sound is pretty much like my other Precisions, and maybe the added Jazz pickup will come in handy someday for something, I don't know.
All in all, the P/J concept seems more like a gimmick than anything else, and I would never consider modifying an otherwise serviceable instrument. | 
11-30-2002, 03:25 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cottbus, Germany | | | Using an active system will reduce mixing problems
If you want a passive bass you could also wire it in stereo and run it into two different amps or into a real mixer (almost the same as using an active system, probably even better)
__________________
Raw data for raw nerves | 1.0594630943592952645618252949463...
Black 'n' Maple #259 | Club Sandberg #032 | Yamaha Club #195
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |