Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Pickups & Electronics [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-08-2004, 01:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
Should I replace my Preamp??

Sign in to disble this ad
Hi all,

I play a custom made 5 string bass made of Zebrawood. I have installed some bartolini 72M45C (deep Tone) pickups into it (I replaced EMGs b/c I wanted more colour in my tone), and also have the Bartolini NTMB preamp in it. I LOVE the tonal characterists of my bass now that I did that. I do not want to change that. I do however want to get a brighter and less warm attack out of it when necessary and cleaner sound. I am thinking of changing the preamp to the Aguilar OPB-3. Will that help brighten my sound? Are there other preamps of there that are better? Is the Bartolini NTMB a good preamp? If so, how should I EQ it to get the best attack out of it.

Thanks for your time
  #2  
Old 12-08-2004, 03:31 PM
silky smoove's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Send a message via AIM to silky smoove Send a message via MSN to silky smoove
Supporting Member
In my experience with the OBP-3 it can be very bright, more so than any Bartolini preamp I've ever used (whichever preamp is in a Cort Curbow, and then rather limited experience with a Bartolini NTBT). This is just a shot in the dark, but to get a brighter tone, brighter versions of the Bart pickups might be able to do the trick a bit better. From what I can recall the deep tone versions are meant to be dark and stay that way without some extreme EQ'ing. Just a thouht though, I could be completely off track.
__________________
WTB: Sansamp PSA-1.1

FS: EHX #1 Echo
  #3  
Old 12-08-2004, 03:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
so would you suggest changing the preamp or the pickups?
  #4  
Old 12-08-2004, 03:46 PM
silky smoove's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Send a message via AIM to silky smoove Send a message via MSN to silky smoove
Supporting Member
I would think that hitting it at its source would be a wise choice. In other words a more bright toned pickup. That's just my thought on the subject, but there are some WAY more experienced people here on TB that could likely give you a better answer.

If you'd prefer to keep the pickups the same and would prefer to change the preamp you might look into a John East U or J-Retro (depending on bass configuration) that has an integrated bright switch that boosts the high end frequencies specifically.

Again, I say pickups, but others might say preamp.... where's David Wilson or one of the more experienced TB'ers?????
__________________
WTB: Sansamp PSA-1.1

FS: EHX #1 Echo
  #5  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:09 PM
David Wilson's Avatar
Administrator
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lower Westchester, NY
Send a message via AIM to David Wilson
Supporting Member
The bart ntmb and aguilar obp-3 are both fine 3 band preamps. The treble on the obp-3 is slightly harsher sounding than the bart IME.

I agree to some extent with the 'attack at the source' suggestion. But if you're happy 90% of the time with the sound, changing the pickups for 10% of the time could result in you being overall less happy. Or not - you might love the sound EVEN MORE with different pickups.
Having said that: I'm not sure how much brighter and less warm you'll be able to get the deep tone pickups - they're wound that way specifically to get that sound. The coloration you mentioned is hard to take away with eq.

If this answer seemed like no help at all, then I'm sorry. Just wanted to give you some things to think on. There's no one answer, and what works for me might not work for you etc etc. I don't mind some low end coloration on pickups, but I generally haven't liked pickups with a muted high end. Other people DO like that, and that's fine - it's just not my thing.

Last edited by David Wilson : 12-08-2004 at 06:16 PM.
  #6  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DIXIE
FWIW:

I'd probably try some capacitors first since they're about 50 cents apiece. Personally, I have found EMG, Bart, & Aguilar preamps to be too similar to bother with changing. You can go through tons of pups - EMG's not colorful enough, Barts not clear enough, etc.

If those Barts are along the lines of a 5 string version of M34C's, I'd give some thought to switching that yields series HB/inner coils/outer coils. Gives you series HB and two J tones all humbucking. I found those M34C's to be too dark to be of any use otherwise.
  #7  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
My pickups are exactly the 5 string version of the M34C. So you think they are too dark as well. How different would be the tone by switching that yields series HB/inner coils/outer coils. Would it still sound good? Is it difficult and expensive to do that? David Wilson, I would love your opinion on this as well if you can give it.
  #8  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
also what would it do to the coloration of tone to my bass?
  #9  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas
Have you tried a brighter set of strings? Something known for a snappy top such as DR Highbeams might be all that is needed. You can alwasy dial out the treble and add as needed. Also, pickup height can affect the tone a lot, especially with Barts. You might experiemnt with these inexpensive easy options before replacing p/u or pre.

I put an OBP-3 in my Modulus to tone down the bright EMG pickups it came stock with. It is not as bright as the OBP-1 IMO.
__________________
Trust your own ears above all else!
  #10  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
Hi Larzito,

I bought some DR hi-beams but I haven't put them on my bass yet. Right now I have D'addario Slowwounds on my bass. They are definately not as bright as DR's. B4 I do anything I am going to change my strings. I just wanted to know if it was b/c of my bass why I couldn't get the highs I wanted. I pray that it is the strings b/c I don't need to spend anymore money on my already expensive bass.

Also, I never played with the pickup height yet. Is higher better for or lower?
  #11  
Old 12-09-2004, 03:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DIXIE
FWIW:

I've played through probably 50 sets if pups or more and there is one set of pups that stand out as being dark beyond practical application - deep tone Bart M34C's in a Schec I had strung with TI Flats.

Another thing I changed in the bass at the same time was adding capacitors in with a Les Paul vol/tone/vol/tone wiring scheme. I would guess the capacitors had a significant impact and would probably be sufficient to get you what you need. At 50 cents a piece, hard to beat. Higher ohm pots will also yield more treble.
  #12  
Old 12-09-2004, 09:06 PM
David Wilson's Avatar
Administrator
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lower Westchester, NY
Send a message via AIM to David Wilson
Supporting Member
kp, the strings recommendation is a good one and it's a lot cheaper to try than new pups/preamp.

Coil switching will give you more tonal options with the same pickups. Another good suggestion since you can at least go between series/parallel humbucking. Series, which is probably how they're wired right now, will accentuate the mids. Parallel will give you more lows and highs.
  #13  
Old 12-09-2004, 10:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
Thank David,

So is it hard and/or expensive to change the coil config from series to Parallel? Since I will be losing some mids, will my bass sound thin? Will my bass have presence?? Will it lose presence? If I do this, I want to make sure it was worth while and that I LOVE to sound. I like versitility
  #14  
Old 12-10-2004, 06:07 AM
David Wilson's Avatar
Administrator
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lower Westchester, NY
Send a message via AIM to David Wilson
Supporting Member
I'd recommend making it switchable, either via a push/pull volume pot or installing a separate switch if you want 3 way switching.

Wiring instructions for 4 conductor Bartpickups here: http://bartolini.net/instructions/pi...kups4_cond.pdf

For terms of reference, a large part of the Stingray sound is it's single humbucker wired in parallel. Stingray doesn't sound thin, right?

I can't tell you what you'll like or not like, I can only give you the options and my opinions based on my experience.
  #15  
Old 12-10-2004, 10:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
Well you seem very experienced and I value your opinion. I am going to call my bass tech and see if I can put this option in my bass. I hope it is not difficult to install a switch onto my bass. All my knob holes are being used. Unless I replace my Active/passive switch. I don't want to do that.
  #16  
Old 12-14-2004, 11:10 AM
Patterson Audio Systems
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belleville, MI
Send a message via AIM to rpatter
Supporting Member
I wouldn't replace the preamp. You may want to consider changing your bridge pickup to the 72M45K. It is a brighter pickup and since you have the 72M45C in the bridge position, you shouldn't lose any depth.
  #17  
Old 12-14-2004, 11:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpatter
I wouldn't replace the preamp. You may want to consider changing your bridge pickup to the 72M45K. It is a brighter pickup and since you have the 72M45C in the bridge position, you shouldn't lose any depth.
Did you mean "...since you have the 72M45C in the NECK position, you shouldn't lose any depth" (since I would be changing the bridge pickup)


That's what I was told by someone before. I think the main reason I want a brighter sound is for slapping and popping, as well as bright clean harmonics Other than that I'm fine. Now since I slap closer to the neck, will changing the bridge pickup still make the difference I need. I do play my finger style over the bridge pickup 95% of the time (probably b/c it is brighter and more midrangy).
  #18  
Old 12-16-2004, 06:45 AM
Patterson Audio Systems
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belleville, MI
Send a message via AIM to rpatter
Supporting Member
D'oh! Yes, I meant the NECK position. The "K" pickup should give you what you're looking for. You may want to talk to Tom at T.J. Wagner (the US Bart distributor) and he can tell you exactly what pickup you want.
  #19  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
I think he was actually the one who told me about it (I called a Bart distributer when I was trying to get barts) I justed needed to get some advice from other bass players. In your opinion, will this change help my bass to cut through in a band setting as well? That's what I want to ensure also. Or are Barts just too mellow for that.
  #20  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via Yahoo to kp_funk
sorry for all the questions
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.