Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Pickups & Electronics [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You
NOT's Avatar
NOT

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2007, 10:14 AM
JGR's Avatar
JGR JGR is offline
The "G" is for Gustav
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Supporting Member
Question Stingray clips on Basstasters - stock vs. Nordstrand MM 4.2

Sign in to disble this ad
I was listening to some clips on Basstasters the other day and I was suprised at the audible difference between the stock MM pickup and the Nordstrand MM 4.2. - compared to the stock pickups, the Nordy seemed to have more mids and none of the high-end clank. I kind of like it...

The basses were listed as 4-string MM with a maple fingerboard. Am I correct in assuming it was the same bass with both pickups? Just want to make sure it's an accurate comparision in case I want to try out the Nordy...

Thanks!

JR
  #2  
Old 05-09-2007, 08:17 PM
JGR's Avatar
JGR JGR is offline
The "G" is for Gustav
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Supporting Member
anybody?
  #3  
Old 05-09-2007, 11:40 PM
markjazzbassist's Avatar
prefers electric miles davis
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Supporting Member
seems like the same bass to me too. at least that's what it looks like on the sight.

I personally didn't like the Nordstrand pickup. It' sounded to middy to me. I dig the low-end burp of the proprietary MM pickup.
__________________
My Website

My Band
  #4  
Old 05-10-2007, 02:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
The Nordstrand wasn't my taste... too middy, and doesn't sound much like a StingRay anymore IMO.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
  #5  
Old 05-10-2007, 11:09 AM
JGR's Avatar
JGR JGR is offline
The "G" is for Gustav
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Supporting Member
i hear what you guys are saying... what i like though is the absence of the high end clank.

i play primarily with a pick, so i think i could work with the mids...

cheers,

JR
  #6  
Old 05-10-2007, 11:30 AM
Registered User

Design: EA Amps
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
You're right - same bass with different pickups AND strings.

The Nordstrand is definitely darker, but there's treble in there - a little more so in live playing than comes through on the recordings. Make sure you're not just listening to the clips on small computer speakers - that will really accentuate the mids.

The Nordstrand MM4.2 in person sounds so damn good... I can't believe how much I prefer it to the stock p/u. YMMV.

But then again, i'm a huge Nordstrand fanboy.

Coming soon.... MTD 535 with Nordie Dual Coils...

ALSO: listen to the "lawnmower" clip - that's a better example of what happens when you dig in a little...
__________________
Don't just read gear reviews, hear them at Basstasters.com
  #7  
Old 05-10-2007, 11:59 AM
JLW JLW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spring Lake, New Jersey
Send a message via AIM to JLW
With the nordstrand in, it doesn't even sound like a stingray. If you don't like the stingray sound, I guess that's a good thing. But in that case, why own it in the first place?
__________________
Ernie Ball Musicman Stingray 4 EBMM Club Member 65
Ashdown MAG 600 head/115 Legion/Eden 210
  #8  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland
Is the normal MM recording done with steels?

If you dont like the treble ringing through its pretty easy to isolate that and remove it if you have a decent EQ, or you could just turn the treble down on your bass, but that'll have a more detromental effect.
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
  #9  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:14 PM
Registered User

Design: EA Amps
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
MM Stock - unknown steels
MM Nord - Sadowsky bright nickel

So that accounts for some of the difference.

However, I don't agree at all with your sentiment, JLW. I think it sounds more like a 'ray should than the stock. IMHO.
__________________
Don't just read gear reviews, hear them at Basstasters.com
  #10  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland
I thought that was the case, any chance of re-recorded samples with the Sadowsky nickles for the stock MM ?
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
  #11  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:38 PM
Registered User

Design: EA Amps
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
If I get some extra time, i'll definitely do it. I have a little bit of a backup right now though... sorry.
__________________
Don't just read gear reviews, hear them at Basstasters.com
  #12  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland
No problem, i just thought it would be able to give a more accurate representation of the differences
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
  #13  
Old 05-10-2007, 05:20 PM
JLW JLW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spring Lake, New Jersey
Send a message via AIM to JLW
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanselus View Post
However, I don't agree at all with your sentiment, JLW. I think it sounds more like a 'ray should than the stock. IMHO.

Could be. Doesn't sound as much like the typical stingray sound though. I guess what you want a bass to sound like is completely up to the player and what you want to get out of it. and I guess what is traditional/typical to me may not be traditional to you. So I guess whatever floats your boat.
__________________
Ernie Ball Musicman Stingray 4 EBMM Club Member 65
Ashdown MAG 600 head/115 Legion/Eden 210
  #14  
Old 05-11-2007, 09:04 AM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
I've tried a sterling with the MM 4.3 and preferred stock. The Nordstrands sound great, but more fender-ish and less of what I want from a sterling ... which is aggressive and a little grainy.

Your lawnmower clip does sound good though. I guess once you scoop out some of the mids that the nord adds you get to a place you like?
  #15  
Old 05-12-2007, 04:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
The thing that strikes me is the difference between nickel and steel strings in the stock stingray tests. Also, the pre-amps produce all kinds of different sounds.

How complex this stuff all is...
__________________
My demo reel
  #16  
Old 05-12-2007, 03:46 PM
Registered User

Design: EA Amps
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by john keates View Post
The thing that strikes me is the difference between nickel and steel strings in the stock stingray tests. Also, the pre-amps produce all kinds of different sounds.

How complex this stuff all is...
Its amazing - thats why I always stress that its the COMBINATION of factors, but a lot of people get hung up on ONE piece of gear or another...

People forget how much strings and preamps/pickups can make a difference - we obsess about woods and tubes and foam to put under our cabs... but forget about little things that can make a HUGE difference...
__________________
Don't just read gear reviews, hear them at Basstasters.com
  #17  
Old 05-12-2007, 04:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland
Too true, but generally you find people who are tweaking tubes etc, have gotten as close as they can to the tone they want with the other equipment .
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
  #18  
Old 05-12-2007, 06:00 PM
Registered User

Design: EA Amps
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_got_a_mohawk View Post
Too true, but generally you find people who are tweaking tubes etc, have gotten as close as they can to the tone they want with the other equipment .
I assumed so as well, but based on the people i've talked to in the last 4 years... most haven't fully explored the simple stuff... it's just not as GAS-inducing
__________________
Don't just read gear reviews, hear them at Basstasters.com
  #19  
Old 05-13-2007, 03:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: East Midlands, UK
The Nordy MM seems to sound a bit muffled in the highs compared to the stock MM (in fact in comparison to pretty much everything else), even when allowing for a difference between steels and nickels.

Is that the case in real life, or is it just something about that set of recordings?
__________________
Warwick Streamer Jazzman 5 Custom Shop
Dean Edge Q4
Fender MIM Jazz
Boss ME-50B
Ashdown MAG 300H, MAG210T + MAG115 cabs
  #20  
Old 05-13-2007, 08:22 AM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RavCat View Post
The Nordy MM seems to sound a bit muffled in the highs compared to the stock MM (in fact in comparison to pretty much everything else), even when allowing for a difference between steels and nickels.

Is that the case in real life, or is it just something about that set of recordings?
That is consistent with my experience with the pup. Its a much warmer/rounder sounding pickup.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.