Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Pickups & Electronics [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You
NOT's Avatar
NOT

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

View Poll Results: Whick Pickup Do You Prefer?
The Stock Pickup 16 30.19%
The Model One 37 69.81%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-14-2010, 03:13 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Stock Gibson SG vs. Dimarzio Model One Mudbuckers SOUNDCLIPS

Sign in to disble this ad
So I switched the pickups on my SG Bass and I've recorded both the stock and replacement pickup (a Dimarzio Model One) with the same settings on everything. Take a listen and let me know which one you prefer!

Here is the stock Gibson pickup:

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9786453

and here is the Model One:

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9874777

Personally I wanted more beef and less top end than the stock pickup, and I think the Model One does deliver more beef. You can also hear it overdriving things quicker which is cool (I normally play with a distorted tone). And remember I use this pickup with the bridge pickup on my SG so I have enough mids and highs with that pickup added to fill things out nicely. So let me know which you prefer!
  #2  
Old 11-15-2010, 10:01 AM
Fly Guitars's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Supporting Member
Which pickup Gibson or Dimarzio

Get some flatwounds on that bass my man!

Can you extend the experiment to include an original Gibson mudbucker too?
__________________
The GibsonBass website has moved | Vintage guitar website
  #3  
Old 11-15-2010, 11:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rio
Send a message via Skype™ to depalm
Model one is deeper and hotter while the stock sounds more Mids and "in your face".

Can't really choose just one, like both sounds and would use each one according to the situation.
Stock with flats should be a nice combo. Model one with rounds and a bit of dive…

Congrats!
__________________
www.myspace.com/depalmeira
  #4  
Old 11-15-2010, 11:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
I think the Dimarzio sounds much better; less clank, more pleasing mids, beefy low end. AWESOME TONE!!
  #5  
Old 11-15-2010, 11:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Stock, tho it's a pretty close call (this is coming from a dimarzio fanatic), I like how the stock pickup is a little bit cleaner.
Maybe with diff strings would make the model one sound better, who knows
__________________
Old Basstard #62
  #6  
Old 11-15-2010, 09:36 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Thanks for the input guys! If I happen to put some flats back on my bass maybe I'll do clips with those as well. I'd at least really like to do some clips with the amp good and distorted (I play a Marshall, all tube, that's where the distortion is coming from) and do some Cream and Mountain riffs.
  #7  
Old 11-16-2010, 07:56 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Here's how the Dimarzio sounds with the bridge pickup going as well, and I've turned up my amp for some more overdrive.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9881393

Old Mountain riff (Never In My Life, Climbing!, 1970).

I am really curious as to how this would sound with flats so I think I may put some on sometime soon and give that a whirl too.
  #8  
Old 11-16-2010, 07:58 AM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Guitars View Post
Get some flatwounds on that bass my man!

Can you extend the experiment to include an original Gibson mudbucker too?
i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter)
  #9  
Old 11-16-2010, 08:00 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9702636

Here's a different riff with the strings a tad more fresh and with the STOCK PICKUP. Otherwise all of the equipment is the same (though my tone is a tad lower on the Dimarzio clip now that I think about it).
  #10  
Old 11-16-2010, 08:02 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins View Post
i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter)
Well I conceivably may go out and buy the Curtis Novak handwound remake of the EB-0 mudbucker, and if I do I'll do clips of that as well, but if I do that I won't be doing that until after I get new speakers in my cabinet (my rig is constantly evolving, you understand).
  #11  
Old 11-17-2010, 02:48 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Put some Rotosound RS77M flats on my bass. Soundclips should happen today.
  #12  
Old 11-17-2010, 05:00 AM
Fly Guitars's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins View Post
i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter)


yeah, I felt a bit cheeky asking - but its an experiment i've been planning, but never got to. Thanks Mark, for sharing your results!
__________________
The GibsonBass website has moved | Vintage guitar website
  #13  
Old 11-17-2010, 05:07 AM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Olson View Post
Well I conceivably may go out and buy the Curtis Novak handwound remake of the EB-0 mudbucker, and if I do I'll do clips of that as well, but if I do that I won't be doing that until after I get new speakers in my cabinet (my rig is constantly evolving, you understand).
Has anyone noticed that the vintage EB-O basses don't even go for that high a price? Seems to me they're available for less than a latter-day gibson reissue plus boutique humbucker, making such projects more about the "fun" - am I wrong here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Olson View Post
Put some Rotosound RS77M flats on my bass. Soundclips should happen today.
NOW we're talkin
  #14  
Old 11-17-2010, 06:15 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Here's the same settings as the last clip, but with the Rotosounds:

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9884713

Also Mountain (Climbing!, Mississippi Queen, 1970).

I've had my SG modified quite a bit, it has just a pickup selector, master volume and tone (the tone knob has been improved to be more dramatic) and I've also got a Kahler 7410 vibrato bridge on it which is a lot of fun. Vintage EB-0 or EB-3 would be nice though.
  #15  
Old 11-17-2010, 06:27 AM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
is it just me, or do the rotos add to that "gibsony-ness"?

I mean, the same strings give my univox hi-flyer an almost-convincing EB tone. I sure dig those strings!
  #16  
Old 11-17-2010, 07:29 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Yeah the Rotosounds are cool. Here's kind of a palm muted British Invasion sound using just the Model One, but playing Stir It Up. I play this one a little different because live we do this as a three piece so I have a lot of space to fill. My guitarist gets confused if I don't play the V chord on the verse (which the bassist doesn't on the original recording).

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9884920
  #17  
Old 11-18-2010, 06:10 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9888458

Testing out my rig with the new pickup. I've put a new set of D'addario EXL220's on my bass.
  #18  
Old 11-18-2010, 05:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
The stock Gibson pup sounded good. I listened to that first.

Then the Model One comes along and says "OK now I'm serious".

The flats were a bad idea. Stick with crunchy rounds for that pickup.
__________________
AKR

\m/
  #19  
Old 11-18-2010, 07:29 PM
rumblethump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pioneer CA
Send a message via Yahoo to rumblethump
Supporting Member
In my humble opinion the stock SG pickup is no mudbucker. The mudbucker in my 67 could only be reproduced with an Acoustic 360 back in the day. It had tons more bottom and measured about 28k ohms. The Model one measures around 11.5 and I'll bet the stock SG pickup measures even less. It sounded wimpy. I voted model one. In the early 70's I installed a model one to tame the thunder.
__________________
A world without music would be wrong!
  #20  
Old 11-19-2010, 02:16 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Send a message via AIM to Mark Olson
Thanks for the input! Yeah I'm definitely sticking with the rounds.

And +1 about the stock pickup sounding wimpy.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.