| |
View Poll Results: Whick Pickup Do You Prefer? | |
The Stock Pickup
|   | 16 | 30.19% | |
The Model One
|   | 37 | 69.81% |  | | 
11-14-2010, 03:13 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | | Stock Gibson SG vs. Dimarzio Model One Mudbuckers SOUNDCLIPS
Sign in to disble this ad
So I switched the pickups on my SG Bass and I've recorded both the stock and replacement pickup (a Dimarzio Model One) with the same settings on everything. Take a listen and let me know which one you prefer!
Here is the stock Gibson pickup: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9786453
and here is the Model One: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9874777
Personally I wanted more beef and less top end than the stock pickup, and I think the Model One does deliver more beef. You can also hear it overdriving things quicker which is cool (I normally play with a distorted tone). And remember I use this pickup with the bridge pickup on my SG so I have enough mids and highs with that pickup added to fill things out nicely. So let me know which you prefer! | 
11-15-2010, 10:01 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | Which pickup Gibson or Dimarzio Get some flatwounds on that bass my man!
Can you extend the experiment to include an original Gibson mudbucker too? | 
11-15-2010, 11:02 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Rio | | | Model one is deeper and hotter while the stock sounds more Mids and "in your face".
Can't really choose just one, like both sounds and would use each one according to the situation.
Stock with flats should be a nice combo. Model one with rounds and a bit of dive…
Congrats! | 
11-15-2010, 11:03 AM
| | | | I think the Dimarzio sounds much better; less clank, more pleasing mids, beefy low end. AWESOME TONE!! | 
11-15-2010, 11:17 AM
| | | Stock, tho it's a pretty close call (this is coming from a dimarzio fanatic), I like how the stock pickup is a little bit cleaner.
Maybe with diff strings would make the model one sound better, who knows 
__________________
Old Basstard #62
| 
11-15-2010, 09:36 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | | Thanks for the input guys! If I happen to put some flats back on my bass maybe I'll do clips with those as well. I'd at least really like to do some clips with the amp good and distorted (I play a Marshall, all tube, that's where the distortion is coming from) and do some Cream and Mountain riffs. | 
11-16-2010, 07:56 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | Here's how the Dimarzio sounds with the bridge pickup going as well, and I've turned up my amp for some more overdrive. http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9881393
Old Mountain riff (Never In My Life, Climbing!, 1970).
I am really curious as to how this would sound with flats so I think I may put some on sometime soon and give that a whirl too. | 
11-16-2010, 07:58 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Guitars Get some flatwounds on that bass my man!
Can you extend the experiment to include an original Gibson mudbucker too? | i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter) | 
11-16-2010, 08:00 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9702636
Here's a different riff with the strings a tad more fresh and with the STOCK PICKUP. Otherwise all of the equipment is the same (though my tone is a tad lower on the Dimarzio clip now that I think about it). | 
11-16-2010, 08:02 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter) | Well I conceivably may go out and buy the Curtis Novak handwound remake of the EB-0 mudbucker, and if I do I'll do clips of that as well, but if I do that I won't be doing that until after I get new speakers in my cabinet (my rig is constantly evolving, you understand). | 
11-17-2010, 02:48 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | | Put some Rotosound RS77M flats on my bass. Soundclips should happen today. | 
11-17-2010, 05:00 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCollins i second both of these (but won't hold my breath for the latter) |
yeah, I felt a bit cheeky asking - but its an experiment i've been planning, but never got to. Thanks Mark, for sharing your results! | 
11-17-2010, 05:07 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Olson Well I conceivably may go out and buy the Curtis Novak handwound remake of the EB-0 mudbucker, and if I do I'll do clips of that as well, but if I do that I won't be doing that until after I get new speakers in my cabinet (my rig is constantly evolving, you understand). | Has anyone noticed that the vintage EB-O basses don't even go for that high a price? Seems to me they're available for less than a latter-day gibson reissue plus boutique humbucker, making such projects more about the "fun" - am I wrong here? Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Olson Put some Rotosound RS77M flats on my bass. Soundclips should happen today. | NOW we're talkin | 
11-17-2010, 06:15 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | Here's the same settings as the last clip, but with the Rotosounds: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9884713
Also Mountain (Climbing!, Mississippi Queen, 1970).
I've had my SG modified quite a bit, it has just a pickup selector, master volume and tone (the tone knob has been improved to be more dramatic) and I've also got a Kahler 7410 vibrato bridge on it which is a lot of fun. Vintage EB-0 or EB-3 would be nice though. | 
11-17-2010, 06:27 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | | is it just me, or do the rotos add to that "gibsony-ness"?
I mean, the same strings give my univox hi-flyer an almost-convincing EB tone. I sure dig those strings! | 
11-17-2010, 07:29 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | Yeah the Rotosounds are cool. Here's kind of a palm muted British Invasion sound using just the Model One, but playing Stir It Up. I play this one a little different because live we do this as a three piece so I have a lot of space to fill. My guitarist gets confused if I don't play the V chord on the verse (which the bassist doesn't on the original recording). http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...songID=9884920 | 
11-18-2010, 05:41 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: NJ | | | The stock Gibson pup sounded good. I listened to that first.
Then the Model One comes along and says "OK now I'm serious".
The flats were a bad idea. Stick with crunchy rounds for that pickup.
__________________
AKR
\m/
| 
11-18-2010, 07:29 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Pioneer CA | | | In my humble opinion the stock SG pickup is no mudbucker. The mudbucker in my 67 could only be reproduced with an Acoustic 360 back in the day. It had tons more bottom and measured about 28k ohms. The Model one measures around 11.5 and I'll bet the stock SG pickup measures even less. It sounded wimpy. I voted model one. In the early 70's I installed a model one to tame the thunder.
__________________
A world without music would be wrong!
| 
11-19-2010, 02:16 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan | | | Thanks for the input! Yeah I'm definitely sticking with the rounds.
And +1 about the stock pickup sounding wimpy. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |