Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB] Discuss anything related to amplifying your double bass


Supporting Membership
Thank You
NOT's Avatar
NOT

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-26-2007, 08:52 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Cabinet design, High pass filters & feedback

It's become apparent to me that some URB rigs feedback a lot more with the same bass in the same room, than others. While these are personal observations, as opposed to a scientific test, it does make me wonder what might be the possible explanation. Amps that I remember using that had more feedback issues were the AI Coda and recently, a Markacoustic 101. Rigs that had little feedback and could be set to play at higher perceived volumes are a Bergantino HT110 or a Wizzy-M driven by an iAMP800. I remember when using the AI Coda, I really needed the 'notch filter' that was included to minimize feedback. With the Wizzy-M, I don't seem to need it at all...
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 05-26-2007, 09:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
Counterintuitive Equalization

Quote:
Originally Posted by macmrkt View Post
It's become apparent to me that some URB rigs feedback a lot more with the same bass in the same room, than others. While these are personal observations, as opposed to a scientific test, it does make me wonder what might be the possible explanation. Amps that I remember using that had more feedback issues were the AI Coda and recently, a Markacoustic 101. Rigs that had little feedback and could be set to play at higher perceived volumes are a Bergantino HT110 or a Wizzy-M driven by an iAMP800. I remember when using the AI Coda, I really needed the 'notch filter' that was included to minimize feedback. With the Wizzy-M, I don't seem to need it at all...
I would agree with this and add that most amplifiers tend to use controls that only boost a particular frequency range, when what you really need in most situations with Acoustic Bass is the ability to cut frequencies. Walter Woods, Acoustic Image, and Euphonic Audio amps allow you to roll off the bad stuff for the most part.

Ric
  #3  
Old 05-27-2007, 09:04 PM
bolo's Avatar
Steve Boletchek
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Apex, NC and Woolwine, VA
Supporting Member
Maybe the more efficient the speaker, the less likely it is to feedback at a given (perceived) volume in a given room if all the other variables (bass, p/u, amp) are the same?

I am not really a techie, and it wouldn't surprise me or hurt my feelings if this is dead wrong.
__________________
"Why can't you just dig what you dig without having to dis everyone else?" - IYAMNI
  #4  
Old 05-28-2007, 11:31 AM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric Vice View Post
I would agree with this and add that most amplifiers tend to use controls that only boost a particular frequency range, when what you really need in most situations with Acoustic Bass is the ability to cut frequencies. Walter Woods, Acoustic Image, and Euphonic Audio amps allow you to roll off the bad stuff for the most part.

Ric
Virtually all of the amplifier circuits I have seen provide for both boost and cut. The centered positions of the controls usually provide neither with counterclockwise and clockwise rotation actually cutting and boosting, respectively. Much of the dissatisfaction with tone controls stems from poor choices (from the standpoint of DB amplification) of:

1) center frequency-- self explanatory
2) bandwidth (Q)-- the range of frequencies affected by the control
3) response-type (e.g., shelving, constant-Q, variable-Q, etc)-- how the range of frequencies affected by the control varies with the degree of boost and cut

Design of useful tone controls for DB amplification would, ideally, combine knowledge concerning circuit theory, physical acoustics, and psychoacoustics (the response properties of the ear, masking effects, loudness functions, and other factors that relate to human auditory perception).

Last edited by drurb : 05-28-2007 at 11:34 AM.
  #5  
Old 05-28-2007, 11:33 AM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolo View Post
Maybe the more efficient the speaker, the less likely it is to feedback at a given (perceived) volume in a given room if all the other variables (bass, p/u, amp) are the same?

I am not really a techie, and it wouldn't surprise me or hurt my feelings if this is dead wrong.
All other things being equal, this is not true. The design parameters typical of more efficient cabinets do not cause them to be any more or less susceptible to feedback.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.