Confused on Which ATM 35 to get

[funkyfretless]

hey guys,

i have decided to get a audio technia atm 35 (or 350) but i'm not sure which one it is.

here is a link to some for sale on google.
https://www.google.com/search?ix=hcb...w=1426&bih=779


is there a difference between the Audio-Technica ATM-350cw and the Audio-Technica ATM350...

sorry i just dont want to get one that doesnt work for my acoustic.

thanks,

evan

[Jaromir]

About three years ago Scott Coley used ATM-35 pro and sounded great. He also said that the 35pro sounded way better than his three times more expensive AMT.

[sevenyearsdown]

I just started using a pro35 that a run to my amp. So far I really like it, but to be completely open - I haven't gigged with it yet. It hasn't left my basement setup.

Scroll down a few threads and you'll find some more detail about what I worked through to find a setup I like.

[funkyfretless]

i know that it sounds good, im just not sure what the difference is between the Audio-Technica ATM-350cw and the Audio-Technica ATM350.

[longfinger]

Originally Posted by funkyfretless

i know that it sounds good, im just not sure what the difference is between the Audio-Technica ATM-350cw and the Audio-Technica ATM350.

According to Audio Technica's website, the "W" stands for wireless.

http://eu.audio-technica.com/en/prod...47&prodID=2433

Audio-Technica - Products - Microphones by Application - Instrument - ATM350

the 350cW has a cable that ends like...
"Terminated with locking 4-pin connector for A-T UniPak® body-pack wireless transmitters. 55" (1.4 m) cable. "


The 350 has a cable that ends like...
"Cable: 4.0 m (13.1') long (permanently attached to microphone), 3.2 mm (0.13") diameter, 2-conductor shielded cable with TA3F-type connector"

Are you going wireless? Will you buy the wireless transmitter to go with the CW? If not, then the choice is clear.

[Mike Arnopol]

The ATM 35 is the replacement for the ATM 35. These are the better mics. While I'm sure that Scott sounded great with a Pro 35, the Pro 35 is a cheaper mic. The ATM 35/350 is a much better mic. It's also more dough.

[longfinger]

Originally Posted by Mike Arnopol

The ATM 35 is the replacement for the ATM 35. These are the better mics. While I'm sure that Scott sounded great with a Pro 35, the Pro 35 is a cheaper mic. The ATM 35/350 is a much better mic. It's also more dough.

Are the labels right in this post? Are there zeros missing?

According the the AT website the Pro 35 is advertised for higher SPL situations (ie. brass, percussion etc).

Audio-Technica - Products - Microphones by Application - Instrument - PRO35

[Jaromir]

Yes, the 350 is designed for bass and other string instruments and it has wider frequency range compare to the 35pro. Maybe that's why the 35pro actually sounds great with bass - you don't need to cut so much frequencies like you need with the 350. Just my (little crazy) theory though...
Anyway, the DPA 4099 sounds the best IMO, but it has more bleed than the ATM, due to it's sensitivity and clear sound...

[Mike Arnopol]

oops---sorry
the ATM 350 is the replacement for the 35

[NachosNDip]

I just recently bought atm350cw.. Didnt realize it was for wireless only, and didnt come with the power module. Bought the power module for the atm350 seperately used and figured that would solve the problem, and when it came in today, the input didnt even fit right on the mic! I dont want to pay extra for the wireless..

[NachosNDip]

So yeah.. go with the 350 unless you plan on going wireless. I can only hope theres an adapter for the atm350cw that can get it to fit into the regular atm350 power module, since I cant return this. (bought it on ebay and threw out the original packaging once I ordered the power module)

[longfinger]

Originally Posted by NachosNDip

So yeah.. go with the 350 unless you plan on going wireless. I can only hope theres an adapter for the atm350cw that can get it to fit into the regular atm350 power module, since I cant return this. (bought it on ebay and threw out the original packaging once I ordered the power module)

Ouch! From Audio Technica's website, it's pretty clear that the only difference between the 350 and the 350cw is the built in cable ends differently. One goes to the wireless unit, the other the regular cable unit. Perhaps, that is not the best way for Audio Technica to make these, with permanently attached cables ending with different connectors, but....

If you want a wired system, your best bet would be to sell the 350cW on the used market, and then use the money and a bit more to buy a regular 350. Live and learn. Life lessons don't always come free.

[NachosNDip]

Originally Posted by longfinger

Ouch! From Audio Technica's website, it's pretty clear that the only difference between the 350 and the 350cw is the built in cable ends differently. One goes to the wireless unit, the other the regular cable unit. Perhaps, that is not the best way for Audio Technica to make these, with permanently attached cables ending with different connectors, but....

If you want a wired system, your best bet would be to sell the 350cW on the used market, and then use the money and a bit more to buy a regular 350. Live and learn. Life lessons don't always come free.

Well actually after doing some research yesterday I found that they make a power module for their wireless mics.. Its the AT8539. Its just like the other power modules, only with the 4 pin input to turn your wireless mic into a wired. And it costs $100. So in the end I have an atm350 for the same price as a regular one, but with the option to go wireless if I ever want to

[Jake deVilliers]

Originally Posted by NachosNDip

Well actually after doing some research yesterday I found that they make a power module for their wireless mics.. Its the AT8539. Its just like the other power modules, only with the 4 pin input to turn your wireless mic into a wired. And it costs $100. So in the end I have an atm350 for the same price as a regular one, but with the option to go wireless if I ever want to

That's a happy ending!

[The Spanier]

Ok. So once we know we do not need to go wireless, these are the two candidates currently being sold:

* ATM 350 (Eur.- 311) “Audio Technica ATM350 – condenser clip microphone with cardioid polar pattern. Clips to brass, reeds, piano, acoustic bass, snare and thomann toms, 149dB maximum SPL, 4m cable with TA3F connector. Includes AT8542 power module with XLR output for 11-52V phantom powering”

* ATM Pro35 (Eur.- 185) “for sax, toms, brass and percussion. The Pro 35 excels in high SPL applications and is ideal for active stage performances. Its extended frequency response captures subtle nuances of the performance. The included UniMount clip permits accurate positioning and provides shock resistance while protecting the element. The microphone’s cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of the desired sound source. Frequency thomann range: 50Hz-15kHz, maximum input level: 145dB SPL (1kHz at 1% T.H.D), dynamic range: 115dB, 250ohms impedance. Requires phantom power (11-52V)”.
Is there such a huge difference which could justify the higher Price of the first one??? Anyone tried both??? What makes the ATM350 specially indicated for double bass instead of the Pro?? Is there any difference regarding the clips?? Anyone experienced satisfactory live results with the Pro??

[The Spanier]

Ok. So once we know we do not need to go wireless, these are the two candidates currently being sold:

* ATM 350 (Eur.- 311) “Audio Technica ATM350 – condenser clip microphone with cardioid polar pattern. Clips to brass, reeds, piano, acoustic bass, snare and thomann toms, 149dB maximum SPL, 4m cable with TA3F connector. Includes AT8542 power module with XLR output for 11-52V phantom powering”

* ATM Pro35 (Eur.- 185) “for sax, toms, brass and percussion. The Pro 35 excels in high SPL applications and is ideal for active stage performances. Its extended frequency response captures subtle nuances of the performance. The included UniMount clip permits accurate positioning and provides shock resistance while protecting the element. The microphone’s cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of the desired sound source. Frequency thomann range: 50Hz-15kHz, maximum input level: 145dB SPL (1kHz at 1% T.H.D), dynamic range: 115dB, 250ohms impedance. Requires phantom power (11-52V)”.


Is there such a huge difference which could justify the higher Price of the first one??? Anyone tried both??? What makes the ATM350 specially indicated for double bass instead of the Pro?? Is there any difference regarding the clips?? Anyone experienced satisfactory live results with the Pro??

[Mike Arnopol]

Tried both. Owned both. Don't get the Pro--it's not as pro! The 350 is better in all respects.