|  | 
05-06-2008, 02:48 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vienna, Austria | | | Question to the heil pr-40 users Since the Stubby does not seem to be forthcoming in this lifetime, I am going to give the large 40 a go. I understand it is pretty light for its size, anyway, and since my h-clamp has bravely weathered an AKG414 recently without cringing, I'm rather optimistic.
What are the Pr-40 users using in terms of shockmount (because I feel in the h-clamp such an elastic suspension is required)? there is a proprietary mount that heil sells (SMC-2 or so) that looks rather bulky, and I wonder if the mic threading accomodates a slimmer (and possibly more economical) option.
Thanks
Alexander
Sign in to disble this ad
| 
05-06-2008, 02:57 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bolinas Ca | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sas Since the Stubby does not seem to be forthcoming in this lifetime, I am going to give the large 40 a go. I understand it is pretty light for its size, anyway, and since my h-clamp has bravely weathered an AKG414 recently without cringing, I'm rather optimistic.
What are the Pr-40 users using in terms of shockmount (because I feel in the h-clamp such an elastic suspension is required)? there is a proprietary mount that heil sells (SMC-2 or so) that looks rather bulky, and I wonder if the mic threading accomodates a slimmer (and possibly more economical) option.
Thanks
Alexander | use the heil mount it works great on the H clamp. | 
05-06-2008, 03:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vienna, Austria | | | Thanks, I guess I will, then. It's just that it looks so pimped and laden with its broadcast-style logo surface, from the pictures. | 
05-06-2008, 04:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bolinas Ca | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sas Thanks, I guess I will, then. It's just that it looks so pimped and laden with its broadcast-style logo surface, from the pictures. | it's end firing so just turn the logo toward the bass... | 
05-06-2008, 05:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vienna, Austria | | | never mind the logo. my point was it looks *heavy*. But from what I gleaned here and elsewhere, that appears to be misleading.
The more I research, the more it appears this pr40 is quite the fellow on distinct applications. It is getting raves on cab-miking (guitar and bass), different drum apps, and even voice. The major claim to fame, for bass miking, has to be the near-absence of proximity effect. This is where several otherwise very useful small-diaphragm condensers I have tried live (Rode NT5 etc) have failed me as far as bleed went. | 
05-07-2008, 09:53 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bolinas Ca | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sas never mind the logo. my point was it looks *heavy*. But from what I gleaned here and elsewhere, that appears to be misleading.
The more I research, the more it appears this pr40 is quite the fellow on distinct applications. It is getting raves on cab-miking (guitar and bass), different drum apps, and even voice. The major claim to fame, for bass miking, has to be the near-absence of proximity effect. This is where several otherwise very useful small-diaphragm condensers I have tried live (Rode NT5 etc) have failed me as far as bleed went. | i found it usable even though it is a bit big (read the thread) but it its both in the tail piece thru the strings and on the H clamp.The stubby is just so much lighter and possible to use in different spots. | 
05-07-2008, 03:51 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vienna, Austria | | | is the stubby functionally 100% identical to the 40, or is there a limitation inherent to the compacting? have you compared them directly?
BTW I found a dealer with a really sweet proposition on these, especially as far as price AND shipping to Europe goes, if anyone is interested.
greets
Alexander | 
05-07-2008, 08:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Bolinas Ca | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sas is the stubby functionally 100% identical to the 40, or is there a limitation inherent to the compacting? have you compared them directly?
BTW I found a dealer with a really sweet proposition on these, especially as far as price AND shipping to Europe goes, if anyone is interested.
greets
Alexander | who?
i found no functional dif between them. and the stubby goes anywhere...but spent a year with the pr 40 and only a week with the stubby.
who's the dealer and whats the deal? | 
05-07-2008, 08:37 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Harrisburg, PA usa | | | the 40 weighs around a pound, which is knocking on the door of the capacity of the h-clamp. add the very lovely but heavy mic clip provided by heil and you have a honkin heavy set up ... i'm using the sabra-som shock mount which is much lighter ... but still it's a heavy mic ... sounds great, but heavy.
jeff. | 
05-30-2009, 01:59 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Central Coast, California | | The shockmount sold by Heil, for the PR 40 is $95! Is there another shockmount that fits well, is as good or better, BUT LESS $$ | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |