Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB] Discuss anything related to amplifying your double bass


Supporting Membership
Thank You
NOT's Avatar
NOT

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-12-2010, 11:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Recording a DB with Logic Studio: Tips for right EQ??

Hi!

I´d like to have some tips for recording a double bass (pizzed and using a David Gage and the EQ´s and Plugins available in Logic Studio Pro 8).

I´d like to achieve the classic “Latin Tumbao” sound, which seems to be a bit compressed and rich at mid-high frequencies. To be honest, I cannot find a warm sound without “muting” the high freqs or overloading the low cue.

Some people suggest to cut everything below 50hz, and then boost tastefully around 320, but something must be missing. I would like to know a bit about using Hi-Pass filters…

I know there is not any fixed EQ standard and that it depends on the DB but… What is your EQ guideline for pizzed DB? Dou you use compressors, HI-Pass filters, reverbs, etc.,?

Thanks!!!!
Sign in to disble this ad
__________________
Pum / pum-Pum / tchicky / Pum - Púm
  #2  
Old 07-12-2010, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
Avalon U5

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Spanier View Post
Hi!

I´d like to have some tips for recording a double bass (pizzed and using a David Gage and the EQ´s and Plugins available in Logic Studio Pro 8).

I´d like to achieve the classic “Latin Tumbao” sound, which seems to be a bit compressed and rich at mid-high frequencies. To be honest, I cannot find a warm sound without “muting” the high freqs or overloading the low cue.

Some people suggest to cut everything below 50hz, and then boost tastefully around 320, but something must be missing. I would like to know a bit about using Hi-Pass filters…

I know there is not any fixed EQ standard and that it depends on the DB but… What is your EQ guideline for pizzed DB? Dou you use compressors, HI-Pass filters, reverbs, etc.,?

Thanks!!!!

Spanier,

Although I own a Realist and play through one, I avoid recording through it like the plague. The only success that I've ever had was using the very expensive Avalon U5 as a pre for the Realist. That sounded pretty good. But there has to be a less expensive solution for you. Perhaps there is a Avalon U5 computer model. I just don't know.

Ric
  #3  
Old 07-12-2010, 01:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
+1

Well, I've actually done a couple of trial recordings with it, since I've only had the bass with the Realist on it for a few months now. But I just did some recording with a trio, and took two tracks - one for the Realist, and one with an AT2020 about a foot off the bridge. The Realist tracks are pretty much going in the recycle bin.

As far as eq'ing goes - if you play around with the high pass filter frequency a bit, you'll probably find you don't need to boost low mids. Just roll the lows off until it sounds right - the more low end you roll off, the more low mids and mids are present. Don't be afraid to get up there in the frequency range - just because the filter says 100hz doesn't mean that nothing below 100hz is audible. If it sounds right, it is right.
  #4  
Old 07-15-2010, 08:20 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Quote:
Originally Posted by moles View Post
+1

Well, I've actually done a couple of trial recordings with it, since I've only had the bass with the Realist on it for a few months now. But I just did some recording with a trio, and took two tracks - one for the Realist, and one with an AT2020 about a foot off the bridge. The Realist tracks are pretty much going in the recycle bin.

As far as eq'ing goes - if you play around with the high pass filter frequency a bit, you'll probably find you don't need to boost low mids. Just roll the lows off until it sounds right - the more low end you roll off, the more low mids and mids are present. Don't be afraid to get up there in the frequency range - just because the filter says 100hz doesn't mean that nothing below 100hz is audible. If it sounds right, it is right.
I concur with this. The HP filter is your friend and in my opinion the most critical basic eq adjustment for bass (live or recorded). I like to start with the HP at an absurdly high frequency and adjust it down until it sounds good. Using this method you're likely to settle on a higher frequency for the HP than you would starting from the bottom, which I find often works better in the mix.

Last edited by Phil Redman : 07-15-2010 at 08:24 AM.
  #5  
Old 07-15-2010, 02:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Yeah, I didn't even realize until I was doing some mixing last night, that I do this. I don't tend to bring the filter "insanely high" but it is easier for my ear to grab the sweet spot if I'm bringing the filter down, bringing the low end in as I adjust.
  #6  
Old 07-15-2010, 09:08 PM
bolo's Avatar
Steve Boletchek
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Apex, NC and Woolwine, VA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Redman View Post
The HP filter is your friend and in my opinion the most critical basic eq adjustment for bass (live or recorded). I like to start with the HP at an absurdly high frequency and adjust it down until it sounds good. Using this method you're likely to settle on a higher frequency for the HP than you would starting from the bottom, which I find often works better in the mix.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moles View Post
Yeah, I didn't even realize until I was doing some mixing last night, that I do this. I don't tend to bring the filter "insanely high" but it is easier for my ear to grab the sweet spot if I'm bringing the filter down, bringing the low end in as I adjust.
Brilliant.

The HP filter is really the only "tone" control that I use live, both for my p/u and my mic. The EQ stays flat for both. Of course I spent a lot of time finding optimal placement for both, and the optimal fit for the p/u.

But starting with the HPF up high and lowering it just makes a lot of sense to me. So simple too.

So thanks for that!
__________________
"Why can't you just dig what you dig without having to dis everyone else?" - IYAMNI
  #7  
Old 07-15-2010, 10:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
I found this EQ article helpful
http://www.recordingeq.com/EQ/req0400/OctaveEQ.htm

I've used the tips to get a more vintage latin sound in my recordings (fat, full, lots of low-mids, somewhat gut-like):
-lower 100Hz to reduce boom
-up 200Hz a bit to add fatness (think of 200Hz and 100Hz as being connected)
-play with 250-500Hz to find a nice balance level of clarity/presence
-selectively pinpoint any of the higher frequencies that need reducing for a smoother sound (balanced against need for attack, brilliance, etc)
__________________
I'm here to learn.
  #8  
Old 07-22-2010, 06:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Thanks everyone!

That´s the key Zeytoun... Gut-like sound.I will follow your tips. It is hard to achieve it without mutting the low-freqs. Do you add a compressor as well?
__________________
Pum / pum-Pum / tchicky / Pum - Púm
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.