Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Amps, Mics & Pickups [DB] Discuss anything related to amplifying your double bass


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-19-2005, 10:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
What Direct Boxes are You Folks Using

I played one of those outdoor festivals this weekend and since
the Walter Woods Ultra has a 1/4 Jack on the "Send Mix" output
the engineer used it to connect a DI to for the PA. It sounded pretty good, but I was wondering if I purchased a better quality DI, would the sound would dramatically improve.

As, I've been doing a little reading about these devices, I discovered that those same Piezos (that are notorious for overloading inputs on our amplifiers) can overload the DI as well. So, are there specific DI boxes that can handle piezos.

Ric
Sign in to disble this ad

Last edited by Ric Vice : 09-19-2005 at 11:03 AM.
  #2  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
I have always used the DI output on my Raven Labs PMB-II...but if I had to get a stand alone DI, I would look into the Radial Engineering units.
__________________
brusabass.com
  #3  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:44 AM
I'm absent from Talkbass for an indefinite period
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Québec, Canada
Supporting Member
I use a TubeWorks 4001 tube DI.
I use it as a preamp too.
__________________
Due to health issues I'm on indefinite leave of absence from Talkbass.
Please get in touch with Chris Fitzgerald or other moderators for board-related issues.
  #4  
Old 09-19-2005, 12:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
Radial DI's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzman
I have always used the DI output on my Raven Labs PMB-II...but if I had to get a stand alone DI, I would look into the Radial Engineering units.
Actually,
That's precisley the unit that I was looking at this weekend.
It's built like a tank. Unfortunately, Walter can't fit a DI into the
Electro Acoustic design. I'm just trying to figure out if a Realist will overload the Radial JDI Passive Box.
I don't usually use a my Fishman Pre A II with the Realist
as a piezo buffer. If I take the signal from the Send on the Walter Woods for the DI do I need to buffer the input from the Realist?

Ric Vice
  #5  
Old 09-19-2005, 12:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
DI Pre or Post AMP

Quote:
Originally Posted by francois
I use a TubeWorks 4001 tube DI.
I use it as a preamp too.
Francois,
A couple of questions 1. Are you using the TubeWorks with your EUB or a Double Bass? 2. Are running the DI between the instrument and the amp, or using a send out on your amplifier?

Ric Vice

PS: Thanks for the info, always a big help to us novices
  #6  
Old 09-19-2005, 12:49 PM
Temp Banned (TOS Violation)

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
Supporting Member
I use the DI out of my SWR SM-500, but if I don't have that, I use a Whirlwind Imp 2. People goof on it because it's so cheap that they think it can't possibly be any good, but I've used it to record and I've used it for gigs as small as a 100 seater up to 10,000 seat arenas, and it always has a really good sound and always works. I keep one in my cord bag at all times JIC.
  #7  
Old 09-19-2005, 04:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgetown, TX
Ordinarily, I use the DI in my Ashdown head, and I like it really well.

Once, I got to a gig with a borrowed SWR. When I plugged it in, nothing came out but a sizzling sound. I pulled my Fishman Pro-EQ Platinum Bass out of my gig bag, plugged it in, and ran through the PA only. Lots of folks (including my bass player son) commented on how good the SWR sounded in the mix, not knowing it was not even turned on. (I left the amp onstage, so I'd have somewhere to set my drink...)

Anyway, I like the Fishman, although it may not be rugged enough for constant gig use, unless you're able to keep it in a padded box like I do (it's plastic).

~John
  #8  
Old 09-19-2005, 08:24 PM
Jason Hollar's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh area
Supporting Member
Countryman

Like JimmyM, I usually just use the DI on my SWR amp too. Sounds fine for most gigs where there's a sound system involved.

However, my favorite DI box is the Countryman. I've had this old dog for many years and it still continues to amaze me. It's especially good in the studio. It has some pretty clean specs (I'm not a techie) but from my understanding it's excellent for converting a piezo level signal to soundboard friendly line or mic level.

I think it's important to get an Active DI, not a Passive one, especially when dealing with piezo pickups.
  #9  
Old 09-19-2005, 08:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Dakota
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois
I use a TubeWorks 4001 tube DI.
I use it as a preamp too.
I had one of those and sold it. What a mistake. They sound FANTASTIC.
  #10  
Old 09-19-2005, 08:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Allen, TX
I use an L.R. Baggs Para Acoustic DI. It has a nice array of uncolored tone controls and has proven to be worth its weight in gold.
  #11  
Old 09-19-2005, 09:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
I'll just put on my flame retardent coat.

I recently picked up a Behringer V-tome acoustic ADI21 and it's great! $30 US delivered. It's a DI and a pre-amp. In DI mode it's dead quiet and in pre-amp it's still quiet and the controls really shape the sound if I want. The "blend" adds characteristics to really even out the sound but a little goes a long ways.

I expect some might berate this little box, but don't dismiss it until you try it.
  #12  
Old 09-19-2005, 09:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on the bottom in sw ohio
The Countryman DI has been around for a long time, and is still an industry standard. And for good reason: It provides a buffered, high-impedance input with a transformer balanced output that provides good isolation when it's really needed. The Countryman can be used successfully with almost any source, and always sounds great.

If all I wanted to do was to connect my amplifier with an unbalanced, line-level output to a remote mixer, I might consider using a passive direct box with a Jensen or other very-high-quality transformer.
  #13  
Old 09-19-2005, 09:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Niether here nor there.
A couple of things.
1. Whatever is first in the chain should have a high impedance input to be ideal for piezos.
2. Walter recommends a passive DI box if you go into his amp first then out through the 1/4 inch.
3. I didn't have much luck with the direct out from my Woods. The direct out from my Focus, OTOH, is very strong and clean.
4. If you've got money to burn, a truly great DI box is the Aguilar 900. I think it's like 20 Meg input impedance.
5. Do a search in the BG forums, there's a long thread on DI boxes over there.
6. OK that was more than a couple.
__________________
"I got better ways to idolize my time"
For example, my MySpace page
  #14  
Old 09-19-2005, 10:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
I have used a really cheap Proco or IMP passive DI on the Woods direct out. Sounds decent and works well. I still use my Raven Labs preamp as Walter doesn't do phase switches. So I use the Raven for a phase reverse, a little bass cut and then use the DI out for a send to the PA. I run the Raven into the front of the Woods. That sounds excellent and always gets thumbs up from the sound-person. Also gives me a line independent from the Woods that will still run if the Woods dies during a set.

I really wish Walter would dump the effects loops and bring back the phase switch. And a nice DI transformer. Those loops are a huge waste of space and energy and I don't know anyone that uses them. I hate carrying around a battery sucking preamp that I really don't need instead of having everything in one box.
  #15  
Old 09-20-2005, 11:04 AM
I'm absent from Talkbass for an indefinite period
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Québec, Canada
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric Vice
Francois,
A couple of questions 1. Are you using the TubeWorks with your EUB or a Double Bass? 2. Are running the DI between the instrument and the amp, or using a send out on your amplifier?

Ric Vice

PS: Thanks for the info, always a big help to us novices
Sorry for the late reply, my home computer crashed yesterday.
I'm playing an EUB only.
Yes, between the instrument and amp.
It has a 1/4" unbalanced output for the amp, and a XLR balanced output for the PA or whatever.
__________________
Due to health issues I'm on indefinite leave of absence from Talkbass.
Please get in touch with Chris Fitzgerald or other moderators for board-related issues.
  #16  
Old 09-20-2005, 11:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
Realist vs Caruthers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by francois
Sorry for the late reply, my home computer crashed yesterday.
No problem really, I just appreciate all the help that
people on TB are providing me with. My concern with using
a DB between the instrument and amp, is that the Realist will
actually "overdrive" the DI, if I don't get the correct type. It has a very hot signal. When I tried using my Fishman Pre A II that's suposed to work with piezos to correct the mismatch between the Realist and my Walter Woods, it actually sounded worse! It sounds
like the way to go is run the DI of the amp and use a Passive DI with a Jensen Trnsformer. The other option would be to find anctive DI that will cope with the high output from the Realist, but that could be pretty pricey.

Ric
  #17  
Old 09-20-2005, 12:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Astoria, NYC
I've used various pieces of crap over the years. Most of them being inexpensive passive DI's. Now I've been relying on my trusty Raven Labs MDB-1 (no phase, oh well) and the venerable Demeter 201s. I've used the Avalon U5 with mixed results. Some of my basses don't really like the 'presets'. I tracked with an old Hofner and it squashed it too much.

I recently tracked through the single-space Aguilar pre and liked the sound. I have yet to try one of the Millenia Media products. I'm familiar with the STT-1 on vocals and horns but I haven't gotten a chance to plug my bass into it.
  #18  
Old 09-20-2005, 12:12 PM
I'm absent from Talkbass for an indefinite period
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Québec, Canada
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric Vice
It sounds like the way to go is run the DI of the amp and use a Passive DI with a Jensen Trnsformer. The other option would be to find anctive DI that will cope with the high output from the Realist, but that could be pretty pricey.
Ric
I suppose that tube DIs have a higher input voltage capability.
However the 4001's front end is solid state; only the output uses a tube.
Its input voltage is 3.8VRMS max, in instrument mode.

The Fishman B-II spec says -20dBV max input voltage.
If 0dbV = 1 Volt, -20 dBV = 0.1 Volt, which seems rather small. (and could explain why it's clipping)
__________________
Due to health issues I'm on indefinite leave of absence from Talkbass.
Please get in touch with Chris Fitzgerald or other moderators for board-related issues.
  #19  
Old 09-20-2005, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Olivette, Missouri
GOLD Supporting Member
Great Info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by francois
I suppose that tube DIs have a higher input voltage capability.
However the 4001's front end is solid state; only the output uses a tube.
Its input voltage is 3.8VRMS max, in instrument mode.

The Fishman B-II spec says -20dBV max input voltage.
If 0dbV = 1 Volt, -20 dBV = 0.1 Volt, which seems rather small. (and could explain why it's clipping)
Francios,
Thank you so much. You're help in converting that spec was invaluable. I guess the Fishman only works with their BP-100,
but since they don't provide you with specs on the output of their
transducers you can't tell what piezos are compatable with
their buffer/pre amp. Sounds like all piezos aren't uniform in their
output. It's looking more like the way to go would be a DI from the ampilfier.

Ric

PS Thanks to all who have posted their comments so far
very informative and useful stuff. This is complicated!

Last edited by Ric Vice : 09-20-2005 at 02:08 PM.
  #20  
Old 09-20-2005, 03:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric Vice
Sounds like all piezos aren't uniform in their
output. It's looking more like the way to go would be a DI from the ampilfier.
Right. In fact piezos are very sensitive to what they are plugged in to. The relationship between the piezo and the preamp is crucial to getting a good tone from them. Piezos sound really different depending on what they are plugged into. The Woods has an excellent relationship with piezo pickups. The Raven Labs does too. Most regular DI boxes don't mate up directly with piezos as well which is why I avoid direct injection from a piezo without a matching preamp. If you have a preamp you like the sound of with your piezo and it has a DI attached to it i'd use that. A passive DI on the output of the Woods sounds great too, although it seems less consistent from room to room even when using the pre EQ signal. I'm not sure why.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.