Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Recording Gear and Equipment [BG] Forum for any issues regarding recording and recording gear


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-31-2004, 12:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
AKG 112 vs Audix D6

Sign in to disble this ad
Well what do you all think? Which one is best for recording and or live bass amps?
  #2  
Old 03-31-2004, 02:19 PM
Josh Ryan's Avatar
- that dog won't hunt, Monsignor.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Supporting Member
I don't have an Audix, but I do use a 112. The 112 rocks, super high spl handling, full range, very nice. Maybe a little punchy.
__________________
aka Blisshead.
  #3  
Old 03-31-2004, 04:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: I'm from Venus.
Send a message via Yahoo to Treena Foster
My answer from the amps thread.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Treena Foster
AKG D112....good kick mic and also good for bass cabs live abnd studio.

Audix D6's.........designd for kick, this mic has a bass boost/ mid scoop built right into it, but I have used it for bass and it's great for kick too. I feel the D112 is a better choice though.

Sennheiser 421.......also great for bass/cabs and kick.

Shure SM 57.....works well for live application on bass cabs and can be used on kick as well.

This topic would be great for discussion in the Recording Gear Forum.


Treena
__________________
Personal opinions are totally subjective.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/treenamusic.htm
  #4  
Old 03-31-2004, 09:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
i have used both mics extensively in both live and recording situations.
the good old akg offers a much warmer low mid, while the audix is very transparent in that frequency range.
the top end of the akg is much more mellow than the audix which has a much more precise (if not sterile) type of sound.
the results: the akg seems to take a lot less energy(gain)
to get a useful low end in both the studio and especially live.
a nice choice for warm round sounds. i always know what to expect from this mic(i have two at my house gig)
the audix being so precise is nice for a cutting high end,
great for "metal" kick drum.it is a bit of a space hog though...
it has such a clean transient in it's low end(i believe that is a trait of most audix mics, excluding the d4) that you load down your mix unevenly trying to hear the lower frequencies.(after recieving an endorsement for my house gig, i ended up only using their vocal mics.)
imho the akg has a much more useful character.
in conclusion...very different mics, best suited for very different sounds.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.