|  | 
01-05-2012, 10:51 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Philadelphia | | | Focusrite ISA One Mic Preamp??????? Well, I have a focusrite saffire pro 40 that just last week I recorded my bands ever evolving catalog of EP songs on and I feel that the pre's on the unit are fine but the vocals need a little something extra for our next set of recording and rerecording. I pretty much only have a $500 budget for a single channel good sounding preamp and from what I've read everyone says the ISA One is great. So my question is... does anyone have any experience with it and can tell me if its worth the upgrade please. Also, hows the D.I. channel on it? Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!  | 
01-06-2012, 01:50 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Bremen, Germany | | | I don't have experience with the preamp you listed, but before you go spending money ona pre let me ask you something. What mic are you using? More often than not, that little something extra comes from choosing a better mic for the task.
__________________
Yorkville/Traynor Club Member #197
| 
01-06-2012, 02:48 AM
|  | Registered User Exar went out of business, so... | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | | I have an ISA One and I use it every day. It's excellent as a clean reference channel, and the DI is really nice sounding. However it's one of those tools that's so good because it doesn't get in the way, it doesn't harm your signal, it doesn't impart any characteristic color. So while it might be a step up from the Saffire in some sense, I wouldn't suggest it as a "magic box" for recorded tone.
I agree that mics can make more of a difference in this context, rather than one clean preamp versus another. | 
01-06-2012, 03:49 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | Don't underestimate the power of a good mic pre!
One of the features of the ISA One is the variable impedance, which can give your mic a whole new dimension. You haven't heard a Shure SM57 until you've heard it through a mic pre at 150-200 ohms. THEN you'll understand what that mic is all about.
Most modern pres are 1500-2000 ohms (I think - over 1000 for sure). Vintage mics that were designed for 150-200 ohms don't sound as good with the modern pre-amps - IMO.
The ISA range mic pre-amp inputs and outputs are also "transformer coupled." That's about as technical as I can get about transformers, except they usually improve the sound.
I have the ISA428 and really like it (good digital converters too)! The Saffire Pro is decent. But stepping up to the ISA One will make you want more Neve designed channels (i.e., ISA428 or ISA828)! | 
01-06-2012, 10:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Philadelphia | | | Thanks for the reply guys, and I just bought a stereo set of AKG c214's a few months ago, use them for overheads, and vocals. I A/B'ed the mics with a friends c 414 and it sounds almost completely identical. (very small nuance differences). So I don't think I need to upgrade mics, maybe just a better preamp. (though it would be nice to have a Neumann)
But tell me what you guys think? | 
01-12-2012, 02:44 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Atlanta | | | The ISA One is a great clean preamp. I don't prefer it for bass related applications IMO but it will handle the job well for sure. It excels on overheads and it is extremely versatile for such a cheap pre. You can record two channels at once even (DI and mic).
__________________
"We've been funking them girls since midnight!" -Parliament
| 
01-12-2012, 03:16 PM
| | Registered User Atypical, not a typical... | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Carlisle, PA | | We have one, and use it all the time. Below is the link to a song recorded with it. NOTHING was really mixed/mastered. It is basic level setting and a few plug ins. It is a wonderful piece of gear, and I recommend it to everyone. Please note, we have a Neumann TLM 102 as a mic, so results may vary... Friction Broadcast In The Studio: Breathe - YouTube | 
01-17-2012, 09:22 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK | | | Very clean, not my choice on most things but I have an amek purepath that does the same job to an astronomical level. I'd rather quite a few other things but in the price range its a real PROPER preamp that draws no real critiscism, other than 'it doesn't sound like X or Y costing 4x more'. I'd say go for it!
__________________
I heart music
www . leedersfarm . com
| 
11-08-2012, 09:22 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada | | | I love that preamp. The one I'm using now is the universal audio 6176. The pre is growly, and the 1176 makes the tone super creamy.
Last edited by mactac : 11-08-2012 at 09:24 PM.
| 
11-11-2012, 09:57 PM
| | | | The ISA One is not a "clean" preamp. It sounds clean, but it is rather coloured especially in the high end. Just because something sounds better doesn't mean it's more accurate. A bell sounds better than a sine wave generator for the same reasons an ISA One sounds better than a Mackie 1604.
Sure, the ISA One is a very handy preamp for making things sound "clean", but it's hype, not accuracy. Just sayin.
__________________
SVP-CL + IPR 1600 + SWR Goliath III 4x10 = bliss
| 
11-14-2012, 10:08 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Indianapolis | | | I haven't heard it, but I've used the original isa's out of a forte console and they are the bees knees. The original was a very colored pre, as with most of Rupert's pres.
__________________
Ampeg club 707
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |