Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jabberwock777 As much as possible. Especially if you're wanting to do a lot of multitracking, and don't want to have to freeze your tracks for plugin usage. The CPU meter on my SONAR setup starts pegging at about 95% during mixdown, and I record at lower sample rates. I've got a 2 gig processor and a gig of ram. Of course, I run a helluva lot of plugins, too. |
If we're talking about needs versus wants, I disagree.
If you're using an external firewire (NOT USB) drive and have a decent amount of RAM, you can get by with very little CPU. The only time it hurts is during actual mixdown, which isn't a huge deal. When I'm playing back a multitrack in Sonar with plugins and 24+ tracks, my CPU (Ath64 3200) doesn't typically get over 10% usage.
And Sonar or Cubase will max your CPU during mixdown no matter what your hardware is. It doesn't mean your computer is underpowered, it means it's trying to mix down as fast as possible and is spending CPU cycles processing the mixing + plugins and controlling the drive bus.
As a side note, a lot of what dictates what you need is how ridiculous you get with the plugins. A friend of mine who was having some CPU usage issues was telling me the other day that he runs an individual compression plugin on every drum channel, every vocal channel, and distorted electric guitar. I was surprised to hear this, because typically you can get by with a sub bus for the drums (with a stereo multiband plugin) and I can't think of any situation where you need different compression plugins on each vocal channel. A sub bus would work there too. And the distorted guitar is already compressed before it hits the disk. Sub bussing takes a lot of load off of your CPU as well as making your workflow a lot smoother.
I've said this before in multiple "what laptop should I get for recording" threads (ahem, search engine) but I started out recording with a 500MHz laptop and an external firewire drive. I had no problem as long as I stayed under 60 or so tracks.