Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Recording Gear and Equipment [BG] Forum for any issues regarding recording and recording gear


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-08-2004, 10:07 AM
4 strings, 2 wheels
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Mic for bass cabs (AKG D112 vs. SM57)

Sign in to disble this ad
Which would be better to mic two bass cabs (210 + 112 + horn)?

AKG D-112 or Shure SM57?

This would mostly be for recording, but live performances as well. I'm looking for a punchy, cut-through-the-mix midrangy tone with not a lot of boomy bottom. I also use a lot of effect (wah, phaser, etc.), so I can get trebly at times.

Please only chime in if you have personal experience.

Last edited by brock29609 : 09-08-2004 at 10:20 AM.
  #2  
Old 09-08-2004, 10:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Well if you're looking at Shure, check out the Beta 52. It's made for kick drums and bass cabs, so it can take the higher air pressure while keeping the great sound.
__________________
Me TB Feedback
  #3  
Old 09-08-2004, 10:57 AM
Passinwind's Avatar
I Know Nothing
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA.
Supporting Member
Neither One

I've used both the 57 and the 112, and strongly prefer a Sennheiser 421 or an EV RE-20 for the sound you're describing.

But you mentioned miking two cabs? For recording that, I prefer a PZM a good distance away. Better yet, a pair of PZMs. Not for live, of course, close miking is your only viable option there.
__________________
--Charlie Escher
http://soundcloud.com/passinwind/sets/passingwind

Last edited by Passinwind : 09-08-2004 at 12:07 PM.
  #4  
Old 09-08-2004, 12:30 PM
4 strings, 2 wheels
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Not an option

Thanks, but my only two options are the AKG D112 and SM57. I do not have access to other kinds of mics. What does everyone have to say about these two options?
  #5  
Old 09-08-2004, 01:03 PM
Passinwind's Avatar
I Know Nothing
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA.
Supporting Member
Both the D112 and the 57 have been used successfully for miking bass cabs many, many times. If you want tight bottom, the 112 seems a little flabby to me (on my cabs, at least), but I've heard some nice recordings using it. You can always EQ too, of course. The 57 will hype mids a bit, but that may be good, given what you asked for.

Mike placement will make a substantial difference too. Try using both together as well. That's probably going to give you the most choices on tonality.
__________________
--Charlie Escher
http://soundcloud.com/passinwind/sets/passingwind
  #6  
Old 09-08-2004, 01:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacific Northwet, USA
I'd go with the D122 about 1 to 2 feet in front of and between both cabs.

Live, I would look into a DI...

one of my favorites on a bass cab is the AKG C4000B condenser
  #7  
Old 09-12-2004, 05:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: I'm from Venus.
Send a message via Yahoo to Treena Foster
Lightbulb Mic for bass cabs (AKG D112 vs. SM57)

Quote:
Originally Posted by brock29609
Which would be better to mic two bass cabs (210 + 112 + horn)?

AKG D-112 or Shure SM57?

This would mostly be for recording, but live performances as well. I'm looking for a punchy, cut-through-the-mix midrangy tone with not a lot of boomy bottom. I also use a lot of effect (wah, phaser, etc.), so I can get trebly at times.

Please only chime in if you have personal experience.

Check here, this question has been discussed in depth here!

Best for mic'ing bass cab?


Treena
__________________
Personal opinions are totally subjective.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/treenamusic.htm
  #8  
Old 09-12-2004, 10:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: L'Orignal, Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passinwind
Try using both together as well. That's probably going to give you the most choices on tonality.
I would agree with this statement, I wouldn't want to use the 57 by itself if I could avoid it but it does give a great sound when blended with a mic more specific to the low end. Try the 112 on the 12" and the 57 on a 10" speaker.

Live, definitely the D112.
  #9  
Old 09-12-2004, 11:46 PM
Munjibunga's Avatar
Total Hyper-Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Groom Lake, NV
GOLD Supporting Member
I'd go with the 57. If it were an option, I'd go with a Beta 57A (that's what I use when I mic bass cabs).
__________________
What is this thing called butthurt?
  #10  
Old 09-16-2004, 04:15 PM
c-ba55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Supporting Member
I've used both together to good effect. The D112 right in front, and the SM57 actually behind.

Here are some examples, although I forget exactly what combinations were used on each song.

the eXperts

So in fact the point is if you use these two mics like this, you can achieve several cool bass sounds at the mixdown phase.

Some DI is mixed in there too. I think "Captain Fantasy" is pure DI, if you want to hear the contrast.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.