Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Recording Gear and Equipment [BG] Forum for any issues regarding recording and recording gear


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-28-2004, 06:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
so what bitrate is best to record with at home?

Sign in to disble this ad
my delta 44 can go up to 96k, but i've always worked at 44.1.
i never figured anything higher would be an more benefit, but maybe i'm wrong?
__________________
MY GEAR:
GK1001RB-II head (SKB-XRACK3)
AVATAR 410NEO
ESP LTD B-50 (lefty)


"Then in the course of time, the man came to slap upon the bass. And lo it was funky."
  #2  
Old 11-28-2004, 07:08 PM
Ray Salamon's Avatar
www.HeavyMetalOpera.com

Unofficialy endorsing EBMM, Avatar Speakers
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Seattle (ish), WA
Send a message via AIM to Ray Salamon Send a message via MSN to Ray Salamon Send a message via Yahoo to Ray Salamon
Supporting Member
I always tried to do at least 128kbps @ 44.1KHz. I don't actually know for sure what's best, but I know that when one of my bands got our recording back from a studio, the bitrate was ridiculously high.


Ray
__________________
Sterling 5 HH / Bongo 6 HS / Sterling 5 H
|
V

SansAmp RPM
|
V
FOH

Yes, I wear kilts from Utilikilt
  #3  
Old 11-28-2004, 08:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
well i guess the delta is a 24bit card, so i'll start going to 44/24bit.

thanks guys.
__________________
MY GEAR:
GK1001RB-II head (SKB-XRACK3)
AVATAR 410NEO
ESP LTD B-50 (lefty)


"Then in the course of time, the man came to slap upon the bass. And lo it was funky."
  #4  
Old 11-28-2004, 08:18 PM
nemo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Czech
Supporting Member
You can record and edit with 44.1 kHz at 24 bit. Then at the end, convert it down to 44/16 for general CD standard.
No point of going higher than 44/24.
Even 48 kHz is not advised, as you have to get it later back to 44, and 48>44 conversion may cause artifacts.

Eventually you can go for 88 kHz at 24 bit (later 88>44 conversion will be trouble free), but only benefit you will get is better capture of very high frequencies like 20kHz and above.. Downside is double size of audio files.

So I think you can stick with 44.1 and maybe go from 16 to 24 bit. Good luck.

Edit: rusmannx, I did edits and reposted my post and you were quicker and jumped with your reply on front of my post , well, sort of time loop here..

Last edited by nemo : 11-28-2004 at 08:25 PM.
  #5  
Old 11-28-2004, 10:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kansas City
Send a message via AIM to msquared Send a message via Skype™ to msquared
I generally record, do all my processing, and mix down in 24/48k. I'll then pull the mixed track into Soundforge to do any rough mastering and after all that's finished, save it both as 24/48k and 16/44.1k. When I listen to the final product, I listen on expensive headphones with a decent headphone amp (among other things) and am very nitpicky about the result. I have yet to experience any sonic artifacts as a result of doing all the work in 48k.

Remember, a lot of things that people recommended not doing with digital were written back when 16/44.1k was the coolest thing ever. Standards have gotten better and so has the software.

To the original poster: the best way to answer these questions is always experimentation. Try messing with recording and mixing with different bitrates and pick what you think sounds the best. You'll end up learning more from a night of playing with bitrates and mixdowns than you will from a week of responses to a thread like this.
  #6  
Old 11-29-2004, 06:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Also, by recording at 48k vice 41k you get a little better S/N ratio. ** perhaps i am thinking of 24 bit depth vice 16 bits...*** The noise floor is a little lower at the higher rate. if you check out Izotopes website and read the manual for their product Ozone there is a lot of info there. its very well written and very digestible. Also it is not a propoganda soapbox for them even though it was written for their product.

HTH
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.