Zoom H2n or H4n as USB interface?
I like the idea of having a simple recorder to capture rehearsals or performances, and a USB interface for more formal recording work. Will either of these devices work well in this dual role? Do you have other tecommendations?
Oh, sure. Yeah why not.
They will work. But I'm not sure if you can "control" the device via USB for live recording into a DAW. If you want the simple approach AND multitrack, check out the Zoom H6! Very effective.
I have a Zoom H2, and it will work as interface for stereo recording into a DAW, however, there is simply way too much latency in the unit to make it usable to sync with a click and do multi-tracks. Too much time will be wasted trying to nudge tracks into sync. I'd go for another interface with lower latency. Maybe the H2n is different... maybe not.
Huh. I always thought latency was a computer issue, didn't realize it could be an interface issue too. Does anyone have experience with the Hxn vs. just the Hx versions of these?
I have a H4n and it works find as an audio interface.
To avoid latency the H4n allows you to turn on monitoring in the hardware, so you can hear what you're playing with essentially no latency (headphones plugged directly into H4n. You always want to monitor from the hardware like this, regardless of interface, to avoid the annoying delay you get if you monitor via the round trip in/out of the computer.
The method for adjusting precisely for latency in Reaper is covered here:
Basically, you set this once and forget about it. Once you set it, anything you record will automatically be offset by the latency amount so everything aligns auto-magically.
The H4n is perfectly acceptable for home recording projects. The pre-amps a bit noisy with the highest gain settings, but I only notice this with some microphones. For guitar or bass, they are fine.
|All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:51 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.