| about thickness..
Sign in to disble this ad
Hi,
i have a 60's jazz in progress. Things are going fine except one thing - my mind. Since i've
somehow made a mistake in inch-to-mm conversion in thickness of the body ( i believe orig. Fenders was 1-3/4" wich makes
44.5mm and not 43mm), i can't stop thinking about it. Body is almost done, but sometimes i keep thinking like 'oh, that will
look like those Squiers or a cheap copies that have thinner body' (wich is visible mostly on neck-heel). I don't think those 1,5mm will remarkably affect the tone but you know..
Another thing is that i'd like to sink neck a 2 or 3mm deeper into the body and now i don't know if i can.. Is there any
minimal thickness of wood under the neck-pocket? I've seen many pretty expensive basses with thinner heel (so it seems to
work) but it just looks weak compared to old Fender style..
edit: i remember on Sadowsky site in descriptions of their Ultra-vintages there was detail of deeper neck pocket
because of having strings closer to the body but i can't fint it now in there.. that would be a trick i'm going for.
ok, tell me it doesn't matter that much and i'll have a better sleep ;;
all the best,
mike
Last edited by vintager : 09-28-2006 at 02:19 AM.
|