|  | 
02-06-2008, 04:30 PM
| | | | How's this for a tailpiece?
Sign in to disble this ad
Barrels on the end of bass strings are 0.25" diameter, no?
I love SolidWorks.  | 
02-06-2008, 04:35 PM
| | | | its freakin' rad. i'd put one those on my bass.
__________________
Newbie extraordinaire
Fender Jazz Dimarzio Ultra Jazz Blue Steel
| 
02-06-2008, 04:37 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ada (Montgomery), AL | | | Tailpiece Not sure I can give a good opinion until I see it on my 1978 Precision!
Looks great, would like to see photos of a finished product. | 
02-06-2008, 06:24 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: MA | | | That tailpiec is rad. Solidworks looks awesome, too. I only know Rhino, and get good results with it, but I hear that Solidworks is better for machinery-like stuff. Is it expensive? | 
02-06-2008, 06:50 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by barnaclebeau Solidworks looks awesome . . . Is it expensive? | I'm afraid I don't really know. The academic pricing which I can (legitimately) use is excellent ~$140 with a Finite Element Analysis package, ~$90 without.
If I had to guess, I would say that regular licenses are pretty darn expensive.
It does rock pretty hard though. | 
02-06-2008, 07:07 PM
| | Registered User Physicist | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Minneapolis | | Quote:
Originally Posted by barnaclebeau That tailpiec is rad. Solidworks looks awesome, too. I only know Rhino, and get good results with it, but I hear that Solidworks is better for machinery-like stuff. Is it expensive? | Solidworks is expensive. Probably not as much as something like Pro/E or IDEAS, but out of reach of the typical hobbyist.
I get to play with SolidWorks academic as well, but the license restricts you to not making commercial parts.
Asad
__________________ Google is your friend. Your best friend. Your only friend.
| 
02-06-2008, 07:12 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Montreal, Canada. | | | definitely a nice piece. Not on any bass, but on certain instruments it would look killer.
well... Solidworks seems to be a lot better than any CAD program ive ever used. | 
02-06-2008, 07:45 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Ireland | | | I think it looks plain. Maybe if you put staff lines on it and then attached the two dots on the lines some way. A little more detail would improve it a lot.
__________________ WEAR EAR PLUGS!! I could have over 10,000 posts if they weren't all this long | 
02-06-2008, 09:11 PM
|  | so far, so good | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: US-NY-NYC | | | I really like the idea. Kicks ***. Only thing in my case is I don't think I'd ever build a bass with enough space behind the saddles to fit that. But I like it a lot.
SWX (solidworks) also kicks ***. I say that having used it for seven years for machine design engineering. I'm now with a different company, and using Inventor 2008, which I approached with an open mind--but I am disappointed and frustrated with it on a daily basis. IMO it has two or three features that should be added to SWX, and it's missing, without exaggeration, a few hundred features that SWX had in the 2003 or 2004 or 2005 editions. The UI was better on SolidWorks 98plus.
SWX goes for $5k a seat (or did two years ago, the last time I was responsible for licensure) for the standard package, plus it's $1200 a year for the support and upgrades contract. But I always got great support/service from my VAR, and SWXcorp does continually support and improve the product. Bugs in new releases get fixed very quickly, and they expand the feature set all the time.
I recently found out Inventor is going for $7k. It used to be a cheaper alternative to SWX and SolidEdge and "baby pro/e", but no longer I guess.
__________________ "Art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating." --SKR | 
02-06-2008, 09:39 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: MA | | If you're either a) a rhino user, or b) a mac user, check out http://community.irhino3d.com/
Rhino is developing an OSX version, and if you've got a little CAD experience you can request a copy (free!) to help evaluate and find bugs. (my experience is only as a hobbyist.) The version that's out right now is pretty awesome, and mostly bug-free, I designed the bass I'm building right now on it. I put a screenshot at Build alpha: Rob Allen inspired | 
02-07-2008, 03:56 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: lower mid Sweden | | | Solidworks is good and expensive - and the company Dassault Systèmes is a real, big, fat PIA. I have to work with them all the time, and they make me...sad, eventually.
I much prefer Solid Edge, which is about as compentent and UGS are much easier to live with than DS.
But when it comes to paying...I still haven't found any useful "hobby"-CAD. There are a few low-prized but they are strictly incompetent.
IME.
__________________
For better and for worse, 'til Kingdom comes. www.suburban.se Quote:
Originally Posted by Basschair
See what happens when you don't check out the FAQ section and use the search function?
| | 
11-18-2008, 05:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: La Plata, Argentina | | | I wonder if you could get this tailpiece done in real life.
Did you make a tension analisys on this design? I presume 2nd and 3rd strings will put too much tension in a way you are not supporting with axile action in the tailpiece. All tension from 2nd and 3rd will most likely cause flectioning stress, gathering (acumulating?) in the corners.
I'm sorry for my poor technical english, but, besides it's a really cool design (I digg it!) It looks to me that strings tension will not be your friend in this. I doubt any wood will make it.
Nice art!
__________________
5 Stringers Club #164 // ABG Fetish Club #36 // Lefty Union #98 (play righty) //
8 strings Club #24 // Fretless Club #247 // Passive Club #55
| 
11-18-2008, 06:54 PM
|  | so far, so good | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: US-NY-NYC | | Quote:
Originally Posted by alexei I wonder if you could get this tailpiece done in real life. . . I doubt any wood will make it.
Nice art! | Umm... I agree wood would not likely be up to the job, but I'm thinking the intention was to use brass, which should not be a problem.
Nice dig up of an old thread. This was a nice idea. | 
11-18-2008, 06:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Sumner,Wa | | | nice. I always enjoy a good piece of tail...uhh i mean tail piece.
__________________
"You've got to be a master **** detector" -Dizzy
| 
11-18-2008, 06:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Seattle | | | Looks like Catia V4... | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |