| |
View Poll Results: Inventions Or Not | |
Yes, Inventions are what progress basses
|   | 15 | 88.24% | |
No, A good luthier is always based on quality basses
|   | 3 | 17.65% |  | 
04-06-2002, 02:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Alhambra, Southern California | | | Luthier's Who Are Inventors
Sign in to disble this ad
Do you luthier's feel it is important to make a bass with something no other bass company has? Like the Warwick adjustable nuts. Or do you think it is fine to make a bass that sounds good and is easy to play, also well made. I feel a luthier should also try to invent new things to make the bass more easier and convient. | 
04-06-2002, 03:49 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Winnipeg, Canada | | | I have limited building experience, but I have paid a lot of attention to bass building so that when I start to build more regularily I will have a solid foundation on which to base my designs and construction methods.
I think on many things it comes down to the cliche "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". There are some things that I have seen used on basses in the past 10 years, but they tend not to be massive departures from the original basses that appeared 50+ years ago. I would personally say it is most important to produce a bass that is well constructed, is easy to play and sounds good. This is more difficult than it seems.
Despite saying this I am not really a big traditionalist when it comes to basses. I think that if an innovation is useful and improves the instrument enough to justify the cost, then it is probably a good idea. Things I would say fit as good innovations are Ken Smith's use of graphite. It increases the rigidity of the neck, allowing thinner and more comfortable neck designs. The incorporation of the BFTS on MTD basses is also a good example, i have heard many people comment on the improvements that this system offers. I personally feel that Novax Fanned Frets are another good innovation, providing more even string to string tension (feel) and tone.
I am getting sort of long winded. I guess what I would say that if it is a useful innovation that improves the instrument, then it is a good idea. An invention put on a bass merely to set the bass apart from other basses is, in my opinion, a useless waste of time and effort by the builder.
Geoff | 
04-06-2002, 08:59 PM
|  | You don't want to do that. Trust me. Forum Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: atlanta ga | | actually, alembic was doing the adjustable nuts before there was a warwick, iirc. 
__________________ Talkbass Forum Administrator Ask me, I'm here to help. Lord Only on Myspace - 4 New Lord Only Tracks from our 2nd CD Lord Only - yes. we're back. sorta versatile residue -12 minute instrumental I find it elevating and exhilarating to discover that we live in a universe which permits the evolution of molecular machines as intricate and subtle as we. - Carl Sagan Rock 'n' Roll... It's got nothing to do with journalists, and it hasn't really even got anything to do with musicians, either. - Pete Townsend | 
04-06-2002, 10:58 PM
| | Luthier/Bass Wanker depending on your opinion | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: SPOKANE WA | | I don't think we need to reinvent the wheel (bass), but I think we all got started thinking we could improve the wheel (again bass).
side note, there are several ideas on Warwicks that people think they invented since that was the first bass they saw those items on. But, again I also though the Chili Peppers wrote Higher Ground since that was the first time I heard it!  | 
04-07-2002, 02:37 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Omaha, Nebraska | | | Why should it be an either/or question?
Mike
__________________
Living in their pools, they soon forget about the sea...
| 
04-07-2002, 03:25 PM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: The land of chicken fried funk | | Quote: Originally posted by dhuffguitars ...there are several ideas on Warwicks that people think they invented since that was the first bass they saw those items on..... | I imagine as long as you patent it and get the checks, the fame is secondary. AFIK, Rick Turner was the first with the adjustable nut when Entwistle was having trouble with his early SS Rotosounds cutting the slots deeper every time he played. I don't know if Turner had it patented.
And how many Stingray owners know their strap buttons, tapered tuning pegs, and 3 + 1 headstocks were Leo's patents???
Sometimes, making a uniquely playable instrument without any apparent innovations is an "invention in itself."
Some, just are just inventions for the sake of being marketed as "better" (I remember keeping my wallet closed when I tried a Travis Bean and got a Precis instead).
Some are just flat-out questionable - 
__________________
rick
- I see sound
"Change the bass player, change the engine room." - Keith Richards
"Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly" - Dalai Lama
Last edited by rickbass : 04-12-2002 at 11:32 AM.
| 
04-08-2002, 11:23 AM
|  | so far, so good | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: US-NY-NYC | | Quote: Originally posted by john turner actually, alembic was doing the adjustable nuts before there was a warwick, iirc. | Atlansia also claims to have invented them.
__________________ "Art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating." --SKR | 
04-12-2002, 10:47 AM
| | TalkBass Pro Owner: FBB Bass Works | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Maryland | | | I have to agree with Darrin. God knows that no one in their right mind starts building basses for the money.
What drew me to building was a desire to work out and refine my own style. | 
04-23-2002, 04:00 PM
| | | Quote: Originally posted by pilotjones Atlansia also claims to have invented them. | Actually it was Al Gore. 
__________________
I play bass not treble.
-Lord Bongo
| 
05-07-2002, 04:51 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: lower mid Sweden | | | Patents....
You can patent anything in the US and Japan. CAT got a patent the other year on a curved rear window, which has been used since the '50s.
Anyway, what's that "BFTS on MTD" ?
And for innovations, how about the BassLab material and process? At times, there are steps in the progress.
__________________
For better and for worse, 'til Kingdom comes. www.suburban.se Quote:
Originally Posted by Basschair
See what happens when you don't check out the FAQ section and use the search function?
| | 
05-07-2002, 12:02 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada | | BFTS is Buzz Feiten Tuning System. it's a system for guitar and bass that's similar to the well tempered piano setup that's the standard tuning method. it moves the nut slighty closer to the first fret, and adjusts the tunings of the strings to be a little above or below (just by a few cents) so that noes will be more in tune all the way up the neck.
MTD is Michael Tobias....uh......Design? not sure about the D. 
Last edited by Milothicus : 05-07-2002 at 12:06 PM.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |