Sign in to disble this ad
Originally posted by Bruce Lindfield Well, what do you call this but a "personal attack" :
"I see Bruce fighting almost all the suggestions I see here and frankly I'm starting to think you either fear change in general or don't want people to be able to ignore your posts."
Or saying that I need to be more "open minded"?
If you take those comments as insults then yes they are personal attacks. I however used them to refer descriptively to your stance on forum modifications and in particular this one.
Do not ignore the nice things I said about you in this thread. So - why did you even have to mention me by name in this context? Are you saying I should not make any negative comments about suggestions - no matter how stupid or pointless they appear to be?
If you go back a page you will see that I had quoted and was dealing with a comment that you made. That's why I named you and not another user. Because you said what I was challenging. Why do you need to make this a personal thing - why not just put your points or opinions - why are you so worried about what I say?
I am not making this personal. You are taking it as personal and I am trying pretty hard to play catch-up by reiterating what I meant and clear up any misunderstandings. Why lay into me and not the others in this or other threads?
Because you have made comments here that I want to discuss... sorry if that is unacceptable to you and I will gladly stop. I can only see this as a personal attack or grudge - there is no other way to see it!!
I am sorry you see it this way Bruce. I want to go on record now as saying that I have no grudge with you nor am I attacking you out of malice.
It's too bad that is the conclusion you are choosing to hold on to.
__________________
Andrew
"I am Jack's witty little signature."
|