Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Band Management [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Band Management [BG] Examining issues with band membership, interaction, politics, and management.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Supporting Member
How would you approach this?

Sign in to disble this ad
I'm trying out for a band whose music I really really like - they have recently lost a really amazing bassist, and have a friend of one of the members standing in - but he is really not up to par, and no one questions that.

I've been transcribing their stuff since monday, and have a few of the songs down - mostly. I'm a little shaky on some of the more technical phrasing, etc - in my opinion, because I don't have a system capable of playing things back well enough to practice 'at volume' to their CD, and some of the rhythms get pretty technical.

The band leader wants me to submit some .mp3s, and I can do that. I'd like to make one of the recordings I send him one of the pieces that features some of that more technical/funk playing, and I have the groove nailed - but I'm still developing my own fills, etc, and am concerned because my phrasing there can be a touch shaky (I always tighten up when I can play with the drummer - something about feeling the kick, not just hearing it).

Should I punt and just give them some of the simpler songs, or should I focus on the groove and leave out any fills (even though they are, in my opinion, a pretty important feature, showing personal expression and 'ownership' of the piece)? Or, should I just do my best, and explain that I'm still finding my comfort zone with the piece?

I'll also be sending over a couple of my own pieces, maybe something from my other band, that features some of my technical playing, on stuff that I've played long enough to 'own', so he can get a sense of how I write, and how I can sound once I've mastered a piece.
  #2  
Old 02-22-2007, 02:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Conroe, TX
I would send both, if you're got enough time. You not only want to show that you have advanced techniques, but that you know when it's appropriate to use them and when it's not (Tony Levin is my hero BTW).

To you, that groove might not yet be polished, and in your mind, it might never fully be (we always want to be better than we were yesterday), but to these folks, it could be golden.

Again, let them know you can also be a foundation guy and won't try to play over everything they're doing all night long.
  #3  
Old 02-23-2007, 01:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Supporting Member
Thanks Jeff.

I did that - sent one of the pocket songs, and a 'busy bass' piece. I'm getting some of my personal stuff together as well, and will send it in a follow up.

Pretty exciting, even if I'm ultimately unhappy with the sound, since it was through a cheap instrument-usb cable.
  #4  
Old 02-23-2007, 08:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Conroe, TX
I think you're fine as long as they get the general feel for what you can do. In my mind, if they don't jump on the chance at a guy who not only has technical skill but also knows when it's time to just hold the groove, it's their loss

BTW, good luck with it, and let us know how it goes.

Jeff
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.