|  | 
12-06-2012, 12:18 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Fort Wayne, IN | | | 33 inch scale neck...advantages and disadvantages Contemplating the purchase of one of these and wanted to hear the ups and downs of this scale length.
I've had 35 inch and 34 inch. Being average height (5-10) but with shoulder and elbow issues I was told this may make it easier to get through a show.
Thoughts on what the advantages and disadvantage of a 33 inch scale bass would be?
__________________
CD on Sale Now: Freakbrothersonline.com
| 
12-06-2012, 12:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Fairfax, VA | | | What brands are you looking at that offer a 33" scale bass? Usually it's 30, 32, 34, 35. Curious as I'm in the market for a good medium scale as I have the same shoulder, wrist issues.
__________________
Spector Bass Club Member #93
Rachel Bolan Club Member #5
| 
12-06-2012, 01:16 PM
| | | | Advantage would be playability and comfort to some people.
Disadvantage would be less tension on strings and minor alteration in tone (assuming you can actually hear it and dislike it). | 
12-06-2012, 01:27 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Fort Wayne, IN | | Quote:
Originally Posted by MarthaSamira Advantage would be playability and comfort to some people.
Disadvantage would be less tension on strings and minor alteration in tone (assuming you can actually hear it and dislike it). | Could you compensate with a larger scale string?
__________________
CD on Sale Now: Freakbrothersonline.com
| 
12-06-2012, 01:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Dallas, Texas | | | ^^ less string tension could be considered a "pro" for playability and comfort.
What differences do you feel between your 35 and 34? The differences between 34 and 33 will be similar.... | 
12-06-2012, 01:36 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: White Plains | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Murray What brands are you looking at that offer a 33" scale bass? Usually it's 30, 32, 34, 35. Curious as I'm in the market for a good medium scale as I have the same shoulder, wrist issues. | Rickenbacker is 33 1/4" I believe.
__________________
Sadowsky Club #259|Gallien Krueger Club #922
EBMM Club #70|Modulus Mob #8
Effects Addict #14|Mesa Boogie Club #33
| 
12-06-2012, 02:44 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: London | | I moved to 33" scale exclusively a few years ago and I'll never go back to 34" or bigger.
I now play 4, 5 and 6 string 33"ers, and although there is a very slight loss of tension, but as mentioned above, the softer tension might help with playing discomfort.
As it happens, I ended up sticking with my usual gauge strings anyway, rather than adjusting, the difference wasn't really that noticeable.
The low B on my 5 and 6 string basses is just fine, better than some 35" and 36" scale basses I've tried (I've got some recordings on this thread >> ACG Finn SC Classic 6 string - Build Thread if you're interested), possibly down to some luthier Voodo though (thanks ACG  ) and a nice extra is the fact that the upper register and higher strings sound fuller and sweeter.
I moved to the slightly shorter scale because I'm a small guy, only 5 foot 6, I'd always found long gigs or sessions became a struggle, especially when I started playing 6 string basses.
When I first tried 33" scale I was blown away on the comfort and playability, since the switch, I've never suffered and discomfort whatsoever!
I would recommend 33" to anyone, a more compact, easier playing instrument would benefit anyone big or small, but I guess bar getting a Rickenbacker, you might have to pay custom bass money to try it.
Hope that helps mate
Eude | 
12-06-2012, 03:32 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing Artist: FEA Labs, Jule Amps | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: los angeles, CA | | | Scale length matters to some, not so much to others. It is just part of the equation that goes into playability and tone. Quite a few variables so you can't really say "it'll be like x" unless you know the other build factors and what you're comparing to. For me, I worry about:
scale length
string spacing
nut width
string gauge (tension)
body proportions (balance)
I recently got a 33" scale 5-string strung E-C, 17.5mm spacing. Love it, but prefer the tone of my 34" scale 4-string (same builder). I'm having a 34" scale 5-string strung E-C built, 17.5mm spacing, same woods. In general, all other factors being equal, longer scale will be more "piano-like" and articulate. Shorter will tend to sound bigger/warmer. It's always a compromise, and one reason that fanned fret instruments exist.
I find 33" scale comfortable to play, but I have decided that I only want one scale length for all my basses, so I'm settling on 34". I could have settled on 33" scale but I have a pair of 4-strings that I love that are 34" scale and I don't want to try and replicate them.
__________________ music | light | gear Quote:
Originally Posted by R Baer Regardless of what you see in the magazines, you just can't argue toast physics. | | 
12-06-2012, 03:34 PM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Colorado | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bassgod0dmw Rickenbacker is 33 1/4" I believe. | Yes ... Ricks are 33 1/4"
The shorter scale makes some things easier to play.
__________________
Clubs - 5 String, Black and Maple, Rickenbacker
Jeff Rath's web site http://www.3dentourage.com/425
I went to Bass pro shop and to my surprise they didn't have a single bass guitar.
| 
12-06-2012, 03:38 PM
| | | I dealt with similar issues by building a half-fanned custom bass to take all the stress of pronation of the wrist and elbow out: A Different Custom P-style Bass | 
12-06-2012, 04:31 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Mukilteo, Washington. USA | | | I really prefer the Rick's 33 1/4" scale but really have no problem adapting to 34 or 35". For me anyway the shorter scale fits me like a glove for some reason.
__________________
Seattle Bassists Club#6, Team Trace Elliot #79, The Fretless Club #276, Official Ampeg Portaflex Club #172, Rickenbacker Club #341, Gallien-Krueger Club #960
| 
12-06-2012, 04:38 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Fodera basses, Black Diamond strings, Jule Amps, EA, IGiG | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Brooklyn, NY | | | IME, the 33" scale allowed me to cover pretty much the entire bass' range without having to shift my left arm from just staying against my body. With my 34" scale basses, I have to move my left arm off of my side to get down to the first position frets. I didn't play the bass long enough or on my amp so it was difficult to notice any immediate tone differences but the bass sounded just as thick and warm as I would hope and felt way more comfortable to play. Especially with the smaller string spacing, too!
__________________ Mitchthebassplayer.com
Fodera | Alleva-Coppolo | Fender Black Diamond | Jule Amps | Epifani | 
12-06-2012, 04:40 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: somewhere in middle America | | | I have one 33" scale bass. I can't really feel the difference between 34" scale and 33" scale. | 
12-06-2012, 05:00 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing Artist: FEA Labs, Jule Amps | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: los angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by spade2you I have one 33" scale bass. I can't really feel the difference between 34" scale and 33" scale. | I can, both in reach to the nut and spacing up high (24 and 26-fret necks). Just goes to show - different people are affected by different things.
__________________ music | light | gear Quote:
Originally Posted by R Baer Regardless of what you see in the magazines, you just can't argue toast physics. | | 
12-06-2012, 06:21 PM
| | | | I really like 33.25'' scale on my Rickenbacker. It plays fast, but I don't miss anything tonally about the 34'' or 35'' scale basses I've played. If anything it is a bit "fatter" sounding overall and I like that. No clarity lost if you use good strings. | 
12-07-2012, 02:00 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: London | | | I guess I don't really notice the difference most of the time, but occasionally you'll be going for something and find it comes that little bit easier plus if I play for extended periods now I have no discomfort.
Eude | 
12-07-2012, 07:19 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by spade2you I have one 33" scale bass. I can't really feel the difference between 34" scale and 33" scale. | totally agree - I have a 32" and I can barely feel any difference vs my 34". Comparing a 34" to a 33" the gap between frets 11 and 12 is only 0.76mm = 0.03 of an inch different! | 
12-07-2012, 07:27 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: NY/NJ Metro Area | | | fatter tone, less tension.
__________________ Sadowsky | Nordstrand | TC Electronic | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |