|  | | 
06-12-2011, 01:32 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Purple Mountain Majesties | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sumpitan I don't really get the point of this instrument. Unlike the Red Special guitar, this bass was never used on any classic records and it did not even exist when Queen and Brian May made their musical mark. The classic Queen bass tracks were laid down with Fender and Musicman basses.
Gibson has already amply proven that taking a classic electric guitar and modifying it just enough to make a bass version does not equal a classic bass design. Queen had a powerful bass presence and a really ballsy tone coming out of John Deacon's instruments different in every way to this anachronic anomaly. | I think the word you were looking for is "novelty."
It's a novelty. Nothing more.
__________________
"That's right Mr. Martini, there is an Easter Bunny!"
WANTED: Vintage Hagstrom Concord in RED | 
06-12-2011, 02:07 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NOLA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sumpitan I don't really get the point of this instrument. Unlike the Red Special guitar, this bass was never used on any classic records and it did not even exist when Queen and Brian May made their musical mark. The classic Queen bass tracks were laid down with Fender and Musicman basses.
Gibson has already amply proven that taking a classic electric guitar and modifying it just enough to make a bass version does not equal a classic bass design. Queen had a powerful bass presence and a really ballsy tone coming out of John Deacon's instruments different in every way to this anachronic anomaly. | The point probably is when Brian May plays bass these days, he plays this instrument. | 
06-12-2011, 02:21 PM
|  | Supporting member | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Groveport Ohio | | | In the words of a submariner: DIVE. DIVE, DIVE!
No, thanks.
__________________
Napalm---the best solution for so many problems.
Washburn Club, #44
| 
06-12-2011, 02:48 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lancashire UK | | Much prefer this one to the official one, which looks comparatively crap and well-overpriced.  | 
06-12-2011, 02:54 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lancashire UK | | | The only reason Brian May has added a bass model to his range is £$.
__________________
ENDORSING: Nothing.
| 
06-12-2011, 03:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Northeast, US | | | You guys are rough.
I'm sure Brian May is set financially. I think this other stuff is a labor of love.
I haven't heard the bass, but - if that design passed through Brian's hands and ears, it's probably a good to great instrument.
__________________
+
Frank
| 
06-12-2011, 03:15 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Agoura Hills, CA | | | Nothing like knocking a bass that none of you have played... The small mindedness of many TalkBass members never ceases to amaze me. | 
06-12-2011, 03:25 PM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Colorado | | First of all Brian May is not a bass player ... so why does he get a signature bass? Second that bass looks like have eb3 and half Ripper. I like different and unusual basses but that particular does not do it for me. They should have made a 3 pickup model.
And what is the deal with those neck dots? And those white knobs have to go.
Yep ... I didn't read the previous post...
__________________
Clubs - 5 String, Black and Maple, Rickenbacker
Jeff Rath's web site http://www.3dentourage.com/425
I went to Bass pro shop and to my surprise they didn't have a single bass guitar.
Last edited by Ric5 : 06-12-2011 at 04:08 PM.
| 
06-12-2011, 03:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: BROOKLYN | | | i like the way both of 'em look. but how do they feel and how do they sound?
__________________
GIBSON SB-450, FENDER P, EPIPHONE CRESTWOOD, 'GIBSON RIPPER, ARIA 4001, GIBSON G3, PEAVEY T-40, VANTAGE FLYING V BASS, SQIER P CUSTOM, GIBSON LES PAUL BASS, GIBSON SG,
| 
06-12-2011, 03:49 PM
|  | Supporting member | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Groveport Ohio | | Quote:
Originally Posted by west*coast*bass Nothing like knocking a bass that none of you have played... The small mindedness of many TalkBass members never ceases to amaze me. | Don't have to play it to know that functionally, balance-wise, it will neck dive unless the body weighs a ton. That's a stopper for me. The other elements of this bass----I don't know and it matters not----the dive stops it in its tracks for me.
If someone does not mind dive, then, yes, they should check it out before bashing, unless they simply do not like the looks. That too, however, is allowed.
Its not necessarily always a matter of small-mindedness. For my personal reason on passing regarding this bass, its having experience with the overall design. If for some arcane reason it does NOT dive, I'd give it a shot as I have liked the feel of the old EB-3 and maybe this is an improvement.
__________________
Napalm---the best solution for so many problems.
Washburn Club, #44
| 
06-12-2011, 03:55 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lancashire UK | | | OK, I haven't played the BM bass or even seen one close-up. One photo is all it takes.
My small-mindedness runs to thinking it should have black switches and hardware,
as per the original. It also is missing the versatility that the guitar version promises
because the volume and tone are pretty standard on the BM bass. What happened
to all the switching options you get on a BM guitar, which is what makes them special?
The Dillion has it all for me. The BM has little to recommend it.
The BM bass looks rushed, underfunctional and made of spare bits. And too expensive
for what it is - I would expect to pay that price if it had all the switching options.
I'd add that the Mini-May guitars are a total waste of money.
And I HAVE played one of those.
__________________
ENDORSING: Nothing.
| 
06-12-2011, 04:18 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by 12stringbassist The only reason Brian May has added a bass model to his range is £$. | Trust me, he does not need any more $. He added it to his range because a prototype was presented to him by the guy who builds spare/backup guitars for him; he posted it to his website a while back asking people's opinions, and obviously there was enough support and feedback for him to say "why not!" Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric5 First of all Brian May is not a bass player ... so why does he get a signature bass? | It's his guitar company, he "gets" whatever he wants to put out. Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric5 And what is the deal with those neck dots? And those white knobs have to go. | The dots on the neck follow the same pattern as those on his guitar.
The aluminum knobs are the same type as on his guitar. Quote:
Originally Posted by 12stringbassist My small-mindedness runs to thinking it should have black switches and hardware,
as per the original. It also is missing the versatility that the guitar version promises
because the volume and tone are pretty standard on the BM bass. What happened
to all the switching options you get on a BM guitar, which is what makes them special?
The Dillion has it all for me. The BM has little to recommend it.
The BM bass looks rushed, underfunctional and made of spare bits. And too expensive
for what it is - I would expect to pay that price if it had all the switching options. | The Dillion version is interesting but poorly made, and the phase-reversal switches are useless for any kind of bass role. Have you heard what out of phase pickups sound like on a bass? Like poo! Anyway, I speak from experience, I own one of the Dillions. The switches and knobs don't even match his original guitar, looks-wise (wrong type/color, and the switches are diagonally oriented on the bass). However, Tri-Sonics sound great as bass pickups, and having three of them wired in series with an on-off switch for each is cool (it's the only good thing about the Dillion bass).
__________________
Hollowbody Bass Club #121, Hondo Club #002, Official Short Scale Bass Club #018, Short-Scale Six-String Bass Club #001, Epiphone Club #010, can't recall what other clubs I'm a member of here...
| 
06-12-2011, 04:35 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Boston, MA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric5 First of all Brian May is not a bass player ... so why does he get a signature bass? | As previously mentioned, it is his guitar company.
But as you brought it up....Les Paul wasn't a bass player. Why did he have a signature model? | 
06-12-2011, 06:30 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Agoura Hills, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by MEKer Don't have to play it to know that functionally, balance-wise, it will neck dive unless the body weighs a ton. That's a stopper for me. The other elements of this bass----I don't know and it matters not----the dive stops it in its tracks for me.
If someone does not mind dive, then, yes, they should check it out before bashing, unless they simply do not like the looks. That too, however, is allowed.
Its not necessarily always a matter of small-mindedness. For my personal reason on passing regarding this bass, its having experience with the overall design. If for some arcane reason it does NOT dive, I'd give it a shot as I have liked the feel of the old EB-3 and maybe this is an improvement. | The smaller headstock tells me that this might not be a problem - but since you are obviously bothered by the POTENTIAL neck dive before you even pick it up, so be it.
I however, will always wait to cast judgment on specific technical specifics until I have proof that they indeed exist. Case in point; the Musicman 25th Anniversary bass...I thought it would neck dive like crazy so I went and tried one out...but guess what, due to the smaller headstock design the balance is actually quite good. Sure, I could have come on here and knocked it because I thought it would have a neck dive problem, but I decided to find out for myself.
I understand your point, I am not a fan of neck heavy basses either, but I'll do some research before I make my decisions. | 
06-13-2011, 08:27 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by MEKer Don't have to play it to know that functionally, balance-wise, it will neck dive unless the body weighs a ton. That's a stopper for me. | Not necessarily. The small headstock and shorter scale will help balance the bass quite a bit. Also, the EBO sidewinder style pickup adds a pretty fair amount of weight to counterbalance neck dive. The body shouldn't need to be very heavy given these features.
__________________ “Don't trust anybody who'd rather be grammatically correct than have a good time.”
―Tom Robbins Quote: |
Originally Posted by kingbiscuitpant Dude, you are cooler than 2 Fonzis tied together with a snake. | | 
06-13-2011, 08:34 AM
| | | | good thing it doesnt come in 5 strings, i would have to have one on looks alone ! | 
06-13-2011, 08:55 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | Love it, and would buy a used one at a good price. 
__________________ | 
06-13-2011, 09:01 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Farmingville(NOT FarmVille),NY | | | looks interesting - I'd try one. Not loving the shape though ... never was a fan of his guitars | 
06-13-2011, 09:02 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Stafford, England | | | Well, theres a stockist in the same town as me, think ill go see if they have any in stock tommorow, looks pretty nice, wonder how it sounds.
__________________ You and your silly english Kkkkkknuggets | 
11-30-2012, 04:12 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Australia | | | Soooo...has anyone ever played one yet?
__________________
Fernandes Club #34 | SX club member in good standing | The Lone Wolf Club #29
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |