Epiphone Thunderbird Classic Pro iv HELP
Well maybe the tittle sounds too dramatic... but I just wanna get rid of somedoubt I have. Thing is that I've read that the Epiphone T-bird classic pro iv has a 7-ply neck then some ppl have written that it has a 9-ply neck... so if whoever can help me with this I will be very grateful =). (Thing is that im buying one next week haha:hyper:)
Read the specs:
Thanks man, but again, I've read that some ppl say that this is a 9 ply not a 7 even tho if there are the specs avaliable on any site...
I once had one
Yeah, some say it's 9 ply
No: it's 7 ply, I can assure you and everybody out there it's just like that
At least if we're talkin' Epiphone Thunderbird Pro;)
epiphone are 100% wrong on their website, I hope this pic of my recently acquired Epiphone Thunderbird Classic-IV PRO settles all arguments.
(note: it is not the same model as the Epiphone Thunderbird Pro)
oops, came out a bit small, hope this one is better...
The Classic Pro is 9 ply. I say this because I have one and the fact that every other Classic Pro I've seen is also 9 ply.
As I stated above; the Epiphone Thunderbird Classic-IV PRO and the Epiphone Thunderbird PRO-IV are 2 completely different basses.
If it has the word CLASSIC in it, it's 9 ply with Gibson passive pickups.
If it does NOT have the word CLASSIC in it, it's the 7 ply with active pickups.
And just to confuse matters more, I wouldn't even technically call the Epiphone Thunderbird PRO-IV a 7 ply neck through anyways, since only 5 of the 7 ply's run the entire length of the neck... I'd call it a 5-ply neckthrough construction.
Thats pretty awesome imo, as long as it has the 9 ply neck... what else differs from the Gibson? 9-ply neck, gibson TB + humbuckers. Hmmm, I think Gibson t birds has Schaller tuners and a different trussrod... would be that the only difference then?
Nitro vs poly finish. Electronics like pots might differ. Also domestic vs foreign manufacture.
I'm still on a mission to work this out for myself...
I think from what I've seen and read, these are some of the differences;
- neck angle relative to body
- headstock break angle
- the way in which the mahogany wings of the body are glued to the neckthrough construction (Gibson uses a V shaped glue technique)
- pots and input jack (easily replaced)
- wood quality (obviously cheaper species of mahogany on the epi)
- finish (poly vs nitro)
- and the ones you mentioned
My own Epiphone Thunderbird Pro IV, ie. the one with active electronics, has a 7 ply neck.
Both use the v-shaped glue technique for the wings.
Differences I've noticed:
- The Gibson has a nitro finish, whereas the Epi is shot with poly.
- The Epi has what looks to me like more of a '60s pickup orientation, as they're closer to the bridge.
- The neck heel area on the Epi is more squared off, whereas the Gibson is more rounded.
- The Gibson has a slightly more angular body shape, whereas the Epi is slightly more rounded.
- The Epi has somewhat improved upper fret access.
- The Gibson has a little nub on the bottom of the headstock detail.
- The Epi's tuners and bridge are Epiphone hardware, whereas the Gibson uses Grovers etc.
|All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.