Fender Lightweight Vintage F tuners?
What is the draw to these tuners? I recall the more deluxe versions of some American made Jazz basses had these some years ago and have been looking at necks to find that some of the more expensive ones have these tuners installed.
Is a lighter weight desirable on the headstock or just contributed to a lighter overall bass.
ALL of the older/vintage J and P basses obviously had the originals, what could have been wrong with that?
Or is it just bling/gimmick or personal preference?
Sorry for the new bee scooby question, looked around but couldn't find anything without sifting through 10,000 threads.
Surely, somebody must have an answer or an opinion?
Lighter tuners leads to less headstock dive, which means your fretting hand doesn't have to work as hard to hold up the neck and headstock at a good playing angle.
The sole purpose of lightweight tuners is to reduce/eliminate neck dive, which some players find infuriating. Many people have sold basses they otherwise loved because of neck dive issues.
And then there's people like me who have never noticed neck dive, despite using vintage tuners on my Fenders, playing 8 strings, and Gibsons. Lightweight tuners are pretty much a personal choice based on whether you are afflicted by such...weighty issues.
|All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.