| smperry | 01-15-2013 09:41 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Scott
(Post 13720953)
I have a bass just like that! :bassist: | I've got two!:p Sorry, had to... Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln
(Post 13722618)
What do guys think of the body shape I sketched up? Balance, function aesthetics? | I like the body shape a lot. Very functional, but attractive too. I can't see exactly how far in the top horn reaches, but it looks like it'd balance and sit well. It's on the large side IMO, but you've chosen a light body wood so it'd probably be fine.
I wouldn't need 26 positions and it's hard (for me at least) to play in tune all the way up there, but I had 24 positions on my fretless, and I do find I like plucking against the board for an upright feel...so I can see 26 positions facilitating that. Aeros are great and the woods sound good (although not sure why you'd need epoxy). I don't know the Glockenklang 2-band enough to comment. Cedar is sweet for a fretless, although it can ding easily IME.
My fretless basses built by Martin Keith (and Jeff Scott's) share several specs as yours, including the 34.5 scale (which I like based on the previous Nordy and F-Basses I've owned). Click on my profile to see them.
My koa-topped one is probably most similar. It has Citron pickups (which are fantastic for the tone you're seking), piezos, an ebony board and chambered mahogany body. My other fretless is more traditional with Duncan single coils, Audere 4-band, poplar body, and pau ferro board. The first one is more towards "warm" and the second more "articulate" but both are versatile enough to cover the ground I want. The body shape isn't the same as yours (and I prefer shallower neck profiles than you and bolt-on necks) but with the amount of customization that Martin is willing to do, he might be worth contacting...but if you want that body shape (which looks great), I'm sure there are a number of other guys here who could build it. |