Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Basses [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-05-2013, 06:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
lakland 55-64 vs fender p5

looking for opinions besides the obvious things like 34" vs 35". what do you think is the better bass? why?
  #2  
Old 03-05-2013, 06:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Supporting Member
First BIG difference is plek vs. not. I just sold my fender p5 and picked up a LOG 55-64. I noticed the Lakland is smoother to play. My opinion only.
__________________
cegrant

Lakland 55-94
Lakland DJ-5
  #3  
Old 03-05-2013, 06:52 AM
Grateful's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Supporting Member
I've owned both, and (minus the 35" scale) the Lakland was the clear favorite for playability for me. If the Lakland was 34", I'd probably still own a bunch of them.
__________________
Carvin 149/Carvin MB 4/Reverend 61/Ampeg 877/5 String 90/Ergo 33/L.O.G. 266/Chi-Love 3/California Bassists 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM View Post
put a shirt on, dude. nobody wants to see that.
  #4  
Old 03-05-2013, 07:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
I kinda figured the lakland would get props..I did own a 55-01 and played nicely...I am looking for a P bass sound for more rock tones..theses kind of basses seem to fit the bill
  #5  
Old 03-05-2013, 08:09 AM
Thumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Layton, UT
Supporting Member
I have both (including cegrants old P5) . The 55-94 has a world class neck and playability. The P5 gives up nothing to the 55-94 in terms of playability, I actually prefer the neck with its slightly wider nut spacing. It delivers the P sound the 55-94 can't deliver (it can get close though). The B is great on both. For Country, my band prefers the P5.

Disclaimer: neither is plekked
__________________
P5, 5/1, SKB 3005, CS '59 NOS P, Fender JPJ
CMD 102P + 102HF, LMII + TC 115 Composite
Xwire, Tonebone, TU2, Compressore, VV volume, Pedaltrain

Last edited by Thumper : 03-05-2013 at 12:30 PM.
  #6  
Old 03-05-2013, 08:11 AM
Gord_oh's Avatar
Registered User

Midtown Guitars
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 810, Michigan
Supporting Member
get a P5 and go get it plek'd...that's what i would do.
and hopefully will do.
__________________
Bassists With Beards Club #1 / Tricked Out Squier Club #1 / Midtown Guitars
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer5359 View Post
The pack got your back.
  #7  
Old 03-05-2013, 08:59 AM
Thumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Layton, UT
Supporting Member
I'm guessing plek is like the new Harley frame, you don't know what you're missing unless you try it. I've never played a plek'd bass, so mine, like my Harley, feel great to me
__________________
P5, 5/1, SKB 3005, CS '59 NOS P, Fender JPJ
CMD 102P + 102HF, LMII + TC 115 Composite
Xwire, Tonebone, TU2, Compressore, VV volume, Pedaltrain
  #8  
Old 03-05-2013, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
so by saying the P bass should be pleked, the fret job is less than good?
  #9  
Old 03-05-2013, 09:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California
Plek-snobs.....
RE: the OP, I too was considering the same choice. I love my 44-64 Skyline for playability and sound. Needed a 5 string and was going to get the 55-64, but there was no where to play one, and the color choices are only the 1 TSB. I ended up with the P5, which is a great player and no complaints with the sound.
__________________
BC Rich USA / RIC / Warwick / Gibson T / Lakland P / Fender P5, Blacktop Jazz/ Iceman / B-E-A-D / Ampeg / SVT II NP / SVT-4 Pro / V4B / SVT 810E / 410HE x 2 / 412HE
  #10  
Old 03-05-2013, 11:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
I had a fender p5 and sold it. It never felt right to me and the B string felt floppy and weak. I do love my MIA fender P four string, but something about the P5 just wasn't right for me. My main player is a Lakland 5594, and it gets close enough to the 5 string P vibe when I need that sound.
  #11  
Old 03-05-2013, 11:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
yea I was worried abut a floppy B string on a fender....
  #12  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacojbass View Post
yea I was worried abut a floppy B string on a fender....
I dont get the popular "Floppy" B string notion. A given string size on any 34 inch scale bass would resonate the same. I dont see why it would be floppier on a P5.
__________________
BC Rich USA / RIC / Warwick / Gibson T / Lakland P / Fender P5, Blacktop Jazz/ Iceman / B-E-A-D / Ampeg / SVT II NP / SVT-4 Pro / V4B / SVT 810E / 410HE x 2 / 412HE
  #13  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:04 PM
ggvicviper's Avatar
aka Marc or Marky Potatoes
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brooklyn, NY, United States
Send a message via Skype™ to ggvicviper
Supporting Member
The B is fine on the Fender P5 IMO. Floppy if you use floppy strings, maybe.
__________________
Love for Bass Guitars & Programming/Software Engineering in Brooklyn!

Currently playing Fender Precisions.
  #14  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
No, I have played many basses and was never super impressed with the B, lakland and status lead the pack by a lot..but they are 35" and most others were 34". Just my experience talking...
  #15  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:25 PM
Thumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Layton, UT
Supporting Member
The P5 B string IS NOT FLOPPY! I have owned the following 5ers: 2 Sadowskys, 4 55-94s, 2 Fbasses, Elrick, Nordstrand, 4 Roscoes, Modulus Quantum, Modulus Genesis, Sukop, Warwick Infinty, MTD 535, Zon 5/1, Benavente, Rob Allen, Pedulla Rapture, so I feel qualified to give an opinion. A few had a floppy B string, and I was less than happy with a few DR B strings, but I think I know what floppy feels like. The P5 B string (at least with Sadowsky Black Label Stainless Lites) is not floppy.

Perhaps Cegrant has another opionion about this particular P5. And it is the only P5 I have played, but still that is IMO.
__________________
P5, 5/1, SKB 3005, CS '59 NOS P, Fender JPJ
CMD 102P + 102HF, LMII + TC 115 Composite
Xwire, Tonebone, TU2, Compressore, VV volume, Pedaltrain

Last edited by Thumper : 03-05-2013 at 12:33 PM.
  #16  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo,ny
ok: flop 1 no flop 1 tie breaker anyone ahaha.
Obviously this is a subjective opinion...Not looking to start a flame here, just want opinions...
  #17  
Old 03-05-2013, 01:04 PM
Jim Carr's Avatar
Dr. Jim
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton TX, Kailua HI, New York
GOLD Supporting Member
P5 is too floppy for me. I like 35" B strings, like my 55-01D and MTD passive "MM" Kingston (Korean).
__________________
Sadowsky RV4 P/J
Valenti Fretless 5 #19
Lakland 55-01D
Roadworn Jazz
Crest CA6/ART tube channel
Mesa M9
UL1 410 & fEARful 15/6/1

www.jamescarr.net
  #18  
Old 03-05-2013, 01:07 PM
Grateful's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacojbass View Post
ok: flop 1 no flop 1 tie breaker anyone ahaha.
Obviously this is a subjective opinion...Not looking to start a flame here, just want opinions...
I have owned both basses in question. My Fender P5's B string was not floppy, but I have owned better. Not stellar, but not bad by any means. The Lakland's was better. But I do not like the 35" scale of the Lakland.
__________________
Carvin 149/Carvin MB 4/Reverend 61/Ampeg 877/5 String 90/Ergo 33/L.O.G. 266/Chi-Love 3/California Bassists 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM View Post
put a shirt on, dude. nobody wants to see that.
  #19  
Old 03-05-2013, 01:49 PM
basspraiser's Avatar
Jammin for the Lamb!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago - NW Burbs
Supporting Member
I own 2 Lakie 55-64s (1 US and 1 Skyline) and have played a few Fender P5s.

to me, the Lakland neck feels better and the B is much (much) more useable.
__________________
LOG#14
P&W#108
Frumpy Shorts Club#1

Lakland: LOG Bass; 55-07; JO5CS; BG5 PJ; Skyline JO5 fretless; 55-76; Carlo CB550 custom; CB550HH fretless; 2002 Scheff 5

Visit www.laklandowners.com/joomla
  #20  
Old 03-06-2013, 12:48 AM
Jim Carr's Avatar
Dr. Jim
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton TX, Kailua HI, New York
GOLD Supporting Member
The smell of sulfur is strong, but not unpleasant to a sinner....(Mark Twain on the topic of Hawaiian volcanoes).

Back on topic: 35" IS NOT SO BIG. My 9 and 1/2 year-old bass student plays a 1/2 size upright with no problem. BTW, that is a 37 1/2" scale FRETLESS played with a bow!!!

Go for the Lakland and fear not the 35" scale, which is a few mm bigger per fret.
__________________
Sadowsky RV4 P/J
Valenti Fretless 5 #19
Lakland 55-01D
Roadworn Jazz
Crest CA6/ART tube channel
Mesa M9
UL1 410 & fEARful 15/6/1

www.jamescarr.net
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.